Comparison of Two Counseling Induction Strategies

September 16, 2015 updated by: Michael Kidorf, Johns Hopkins University

Comparison of Two Different Counseling Schedules on Treatment Response of New Admissions to Methadone Maintenance

New admissions (n = 120) to the Addiction Treatment Services (ATS) will be stabilized on methadone and randomly assigned to one of two induction conditions: 1) routine stepped care, or 2) low threshold stepped care. All participants will continue with routine stepped care in month 4. Treatment retention is the primary outcome measure, while drug use (measured via weekly urinalysis testing) is the major secondary outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial will evaluate two induction strategies for helping out-of-treatment opioid abusers transition to methadone maintenance treatment. All study participants (n = 120) will be new admissions to the Addiction Treatment Services at Hopkins Bayview (ATS), stabilized on 80 mg of methadone, and randomly assigned to one of two study conditions. The experimental induction condition will receive low threshold stepped care (LTSC) for the first 3-month of treatment that reduces the counseling demands of maintenance treatment (i.e., one counseling session / month). This condition will be compared to routine stepped care (RSC) for the first 3-months, which provides escalating intensity of counseling schedules contingent on drug use or poor adherence. RSC is routine treatment at ATS. All participants will receive routine stepped care following the 3-month induction phase, and will have the opportunity to remain in treatment at ATS following study participation. Participation is for 4-months. Retention is the primary outcome. Participants will also submit urine samples weekly on a random schedule each month. We hypothesize that LTSC participants will exhibit better retention than RSC participants, and that both conditions will exhibit reductions in drug use compared to baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Addiction Treatment Services -- Hopkins Bayview

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • New admissions to methadone maintenance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Acute medical or psychiatric condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 3-month counseling induction: routine care
Participants assigned to this condition will receive routine stepped-care treatment at ATS. Participants will begin in Step 2 (one counseling session per week), and be advanced to higher intensity care based on missed counseling sessions and drug-positive urine samples. Participants advanced to Step 3 will be scheduled to attend 2 group counseling sessions per week (in addition to individual counseling), and those advanced to Step 4 will be scheduled to attend 8 group counseling sessions per week (in addition to individual counseling). Time of methadone dosing will be based on step of care.
Behavioral: stepped-based care
Stepped-based care is routine treatment at ATS. Participants begin a low intensity care, and are advanced to more intensive levels of care (i.e., more intensive schedules of counseling) based on urine samples and counseling adherence.
Experimental: 3-month counseling induction: low threshold
Participants assigned to this treatment arm will receive low threshold counseling. These participants will be scheduled to attend one counseling session per month with their individual counselor for the first 3-months. Participants can attend more counseling sessions if they desire, and they can meet with program supervisors to address crisis situations. They can receive methadone dosing any time during the clinic hours (7:30 am-1:15 pm and 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm)
Behavioral: low threshold care
Low threshold care refers to a service delivery method that reduces the treatment demands for new admissions to substance abuse treatment. In the present study, participants will be scheduled to attend less counseling sessions, and will have greater access to methadone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment retention
Time Frame: 120 days
The number of days patients remained in treatment over the 120 day study.
120 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drug use
Time Frame: weekly observation for 120 days
Urinalysis testing is administered weekly, using a random testing schedule. Samples are tested for the presence of opioids, cocaine, and benzodiazepines
weekly observation for 120 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Collaborators

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Kidorf, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • da012347-4

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drug Use Disorders

Clinical Trials on stepped-based care

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Guinea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe