Stepped Care vs Center-based Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation for Older Frail Adults Living in Rural MA

March 1, 2023 updated by: Peter Lindenauer, MD
This feasibility trial will focus on older adults 60+ who are candidates for cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation and who are vulnerable, mildly or moderately frail. We will randomize older frail adults living in rural regions of the county to Treatment as usual (TAU) or Stepped care (SC). TAU refers to center-based rehabilitation (CBR). Patients randomized to SC will be enrolled in traditional CBR and based on prespecified non-response criteria, will step up to three services: 1) Transportation-subsidized CBR, 2) Home-based telerehabilitation (TR), and 3) Community health worker-(CHW) supported home-based TR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality and both CR and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improve function, quality of life, and decrease readmission rates. Despite their proven efficacy, both programs are grossly underutilized, with fewer than 20% of eligible persons participating. Patients with heart and lung disease living in rural communities have even lower rates of participation.

The objective of this proposal is to test the feasibility of performing a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness and value of a stepped care (SC) model versus treatment as usual (TAU) in older frail adults living rural counties. TAU refers to center-based rehabilitation (CBR). The SC model includes initial enrollment into CBR followed by possible step up to three interventions based on prespecified non-response criteria: 1) Transportation-subsidized CBR, 2) Home-based telerehabilitation (TR), and 3) Community health worker-(CHW) supported home-based TR. Unlike traditional SC models, the initial treatment in this model, i.e. CBR, is not the least resource intensive. CBR was chosen as the initial option because it is currently considered the standard of care.

We will conduct a parallel, 2-arm, randomized controlled feasibility trial. Eligible participants will be randomized to TAU (CBR) or SC. Because of the urgent need to address underuse of both CR and PR in rural regions, the proposed feasibility trial will enroll patients referred to either CR or PR. Both arms include an in-person intake evaluation conducted by a certified rehabilitation nurse in the rehabilitation center to determine exercise tolerance and design a tailored 8-week rehabilitation program. Patients randomized to TAU participate in two weekly sessions at the center and are encouraged to exercise at home in between sessions. Patients randomized to the SC arm will also be enrolled in the CBR program. Those who meet prespecified non-response criteria will be stepped up to transportation-subsidized CBR. Providing transportation may not be sufficient for frail older adults who are reluctant to leave their homes in the winter, unfamiliar with exercising, or do not want to exercise in a group setting. Thus, non-responders, will be stepped up to home-based TR. Home-based rehabilitation will be supported by Chanl Health, a virtual platform that supports education and self-management, remote monitoring, and coaching by rehabilitation specialists. Non-responders will be stepped up to CHW-supported home-based TR. The CHW will be help participants use the mobile app, access educational materials, clarify educational content, and exercise during biweekly in-person visits.

Purpose: Heart and lung disease are the first and third leading causes of mortality in the US, respectively. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality and both CR and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improve function, quality of life, and decrease readmission rates. Despite their proven efficacy, both programs are grossly underutilized, with fewer than 20% of eligible persons participating. Patients living in rural communities have even lower rates of participation. Home-based CR and PR has been developed with the goal of improving uptake, and low to moderate strength evidence indicates that these programs are as effective as center-based programs. Further work is needed, however, to examine how best to increase utilization of CR and PR in rural communities. While several studies have examined approaches to improve referral and enrollment, there is little evidence on how to optimize adherence to CR, and no evidence how to optimize adherence to PR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01201
        • Recruiting
        • Berkshire Medical Center, Inc
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Baystate Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults (greater than 60 years of age)
  • Live in a Level 1 or 2 state designated rural area in Berkshire County
  • Has a condition qualifying for reimbursement (by government or private insurance) for cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation
  • Score of 4, 5 or 6 on the Clinical Frailty Scale(24) (corresponding to vulnerable, mildly frail, and moderately frail)

Exclusion Criteria:

Attended pulmonary or cardiac rehabilitation within the previous two years

  • Resting pulse oximetry < 85% on room air or while breathing the prescribed level of supplemental oxygen
  • Unstable asthma with hospital admission or ED visit within previous three months
  • Severe exercise-induced hypoxemia, not correctable with oxygen supplementation
  • Acute systemic illness or fever
  • Complex ventricular arrhythmias
  • Resting systolic blood pressure greater than 200mmhg
  • Resting diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mmhg
  • Orthostatic blood pressure (BP) drop of >20 mm Hg with symptoms
  • History of arrhythmia with syncope
  • Severe symptomatic valvular disease
  • Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled atrial or ventricular arrhythmias
  • Uncontrolled sinus tachycardia (>120 BPM)
  • Uncompensated congestive heart failure
  • Third degree heart block without a pacemaker
  • Active pericarditis or myocarditis
  • Acute cor pulmonale, severe pulmonary hypertension
  • Resting ST displacement > 2mm
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (resting blood glucose >400 mg/dl)
  • Conditions other than pulmonary or cardiac that prohibit exercise (e.g., arthritis, severe neurologic, hepatic or renal disease)
  • Planned surgery or transplantation
  • Hearing impairment limiting ability to participate in data collection by telephone
  • Life expectancy less than one year
  • Significant cognitive deficit and/or psychiatric illness that interferes with ability to provide consent, follow directions, or adhere to study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as usual

Patients referred to CR or PR are initially telephoned by a RN,RC or RA who describes the program and schedules the initial intake evaluation. The intake evaluation reflects usual care practices at both BMC and Fairview Hospital. The purpose of this initial session is to obtain the data required to design an individualized effective and safe rehabilitation program. It is performed by a RN, RC, or RA and includes performing a medical history, physical examination, and testing.

Reminder telephone calls are placed prior to the initial intake and formal reassessments visits.

Active Comparator: Stepped Care

The SC arm will be offered Center Based Rehabilitation (CBR) and subsequently stepped up to transportation-subsidized CBR, home-based TR, and CHW-supported home-based TR based on prespecified non-response criteria/poor adherence.

Standard of Care. Patients meeting a non-response criterion will be stepped up to transportation-subsidized CBR.

Step 1. Transportation-Subsidized CBR. Step 2. Home-Based TR. Step 3. CHW-Supported Home-Based TR.

Patients meeting a non-response criterion will be stepped up to the next step

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment
Time Frame: 3 years
Average number of eligible patients randomized per month
3 years
Adherence
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Proportion of older frail adults randomized to SC attending prescribed rehabilitation sessions
8 weeks
Adherence
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Average number of sessions attended in SC arm
8 weeks
Retention
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Proportion in SC arm completing outcome measures
8 weeks
Burden of Data Collection
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Baseline Measurement Completion- The investigators need to reach >80% of baseline data to move forward with this study
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Dyspnea severity
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS computer adaptive test (CAT) to assess dyspnea severity.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
PROMIS Dyspnea functional limitation
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess dyspnea functional limitation.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
PROMIS Physical function
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS ACT to assess physical function.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
PROMIS Social isolation
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess social isolation.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
PROMIS anxiety
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of Rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess anxiety.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of Rehabilitation
PROMIS Depression/Sadness
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess Depression/Sadness.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
PASE
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Physical Activity Scale for the elderly. The PASE is a brief, 12-item, reliable, validated questionnaire used to measure physical activity in older adults. Activities are scored using frequency, duration and intensity parameters over the previous week.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated and widely used generic health status questionnaire that measures amount of difficulty with mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Smoking
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Smoking will be quantified by self-report (number of cigarettes smoked per day)
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
6 Minute walk test (6-MWT)
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
The 6-MWT is a widely used and well-validated measure of functional exercise capacity. The 6-MWT measures the distance that a patient can walk quickly on a flat, hard surface over six minutes. It is self-paced and assesses sub-maximal aerobic capacity and endurance.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Physical Function and Mobility will be measured using SPPB which includes a walking speed test, a hierarchal balance test (feet side by side, semi tandem stance, tandem stance), and a 5-times sit to stand test, each scored on a 0-4 scale.
1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Feasibility Outcomes
Time Frame: 3 years
The investigators will look at data already obtained in the research project to determine the number of non-response criteria and average number of days on each step to develop a new protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 28, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Aggregate data will be shared, not IPD will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Stepped Care

3
Subscribe