Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl Following Pressure Equalization Tube Placement

February 17, 2014 updated by: Joseph D. Tobias, Nationwide Children's Hospital

Pain Management Following Myringotomy and Tube Placement: Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl

This is a study to compare intranasal dexmedetomidine to intranasal fentanyl following anesthesia induction in patients undergoing myringotomy and placement of pressure equalization (PE) tubes in providing analgesia and smoothing emergence from general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • functional status as assigned by the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of I or II (no or minimal co-morbid disease)
  • patients scheduled for placement of bilateral myringotomy tubes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of allergy to either dexmedetomidine or fentanyl
  • concomitant use of medications which may exaggerate the HR response of dexmedetomidine including digoxin or β-adrenergic antagonists.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: dexmedetomidine w/ midazolam
Midazolam 0.5 mg/kg given orally pre-op and 1 dose of dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg given intranasally in OR.
dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) will be administered intranasally
Other Names:
  • Precedex
Sedative given pre-op.
Other Names:
  • Versed
Active Comparator: fentanyl w/ midazolam
Midazolam 0.5 mg/kg given orally pre-op and 1 dose of fentanyl 2mcg/kg given intranasally in OR.
Sedative given pre-op.
Other Names:
  • Versed
fentanyl (2 µg/kg) will be administered intranasally
Experimental: dexmedetomidine w/o midazolam
1 dose of dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg given intranasally in OR without any pre-medication.
dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) will be administered intranasally
Other Names:
  • Precedex
Active Comparator: fentanyl w/o midazolam
1 dose of fentanyl 2mcg/kg given intranasally in the OR without any pre-medication.
fentanyl (2 µg/kg) will be administered intranasally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale Scores
Time Frame: 30 mins. post-op

FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: each of the five categories (F) Face, (L) Legs, (A) Activity, (C) Cry, (C) Consolability is scored from 0-2, which results in a total score between 0 and 10.

0 = Relaxed and comfortable 1-3 = Mild discomfort 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-10 = Severe discomfort or pain or both

30 mins. post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery From General Anesthesia
Time Frame: 30 mins. post-op
Post-anesthesia recovery score: Aldrete The Aldrete scoring system takes into account the patient's ability to move, respiration, circulation, consciousness, and oxygen saturation. A maximum of two points are awarded in each category and a score of 9 or 10 is required for discharge.
30 mins. post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Otitis Media

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Subscribe