Web-based Dietary Intervention for Diabetic Patients (myDIDeA)

December 24, 2017 updated by: Amutha Ramadas, Monash University

Dietary Intervention Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An e-Approach

The Internet holds promise for a wide-scale promotion of dietary and lifestyle behavioural change. Website-delivered interventions have a potentially broad population reach as it is available 24 hours, and could be hosted by both government and non-governmental agencies. To date, there is no published study focused on dietary behaviour change in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) via a website-based system.

myDIDeA was a 12-months two-armed randomised controlled trial conducted in three tertiary public hospitals in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The primary outcome was the Dietary Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour (DKAB) score, while the secondary outcomes included the food intake, anthropometry measurements, blood pressure and resting heart rate, blood biomarkers and the Dietary Stages of Change (DSOC) score.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was designed according to the recommendations of the CONSORT statement for randomised trials of non-pharmacologic treatment. The study commenced in November 2009 after obtaining the ethical approvals from relevant authorities, and the trial has been registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01246687). After being screened for eligibility, 128 patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) from the outpatient clinics at these hospitals were recruited into the study with informed consent. After the baseline data collection, the participants were randomised into the e-intervention (n=66) or the control (n=62) group. The e-intervention group received an intensive six-month dietary intervention through the study website, which was developed based on various established guidelines and recommendations but personalised according to the participants' DSOC, in addition to the usual standard treatment at the outpatient clinics. In contrast, the control group received the usual standard treatment given to patients with T2DM, and did not receive the website login information, or any reinforcement via e-mail or SMS. Data were collected at baseline, six months post-intervention and at 12 months follow-up. A structured and pre-tested questionnaire was used for this purpose. The anthropometry measurements, blood pressure and resting heart rate were measured at data collection. Details on the blood biomarkers were obtained from the hospital medical records. The statistical analysis revealed that myDIDeA was successful in improving overall DKAB score by improving the diabetes-related dietary knowledge and attitude of the participants. Besides, the intervention programme also have successfully improved the DSOC score of the intervention group, suggesting the participants were indeed making small but significant progress in changing their dietary behaviour. Improvement in the diet quality (improvement in vegetable intake and reduction in carbohydrate and protein intake), glycaemic control and total cholesterol have added credibility to this web-delivered intervention. The process evaluation of the study website revealed that on the average each participant logged in the website once a week and spent 11 minutes at the website per visit. The usability (facilitating conditions) scored the highest, while the acceptability (anxiety) scored the lowest.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Selangor
      • Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia, 68100
        • Hospital Selayang
      • Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia, 43000
        • Hospital Serdang
    • Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya
      • Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia, 62250
        • Hospital Putrajaya

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mentally sound men and women who are > 18 years old.
  • Literate with a fair command of English and/or Malay languages.
  • Have access to the Internet at home, work or public place.
  • Willing to access the web portal at least once every fortnight.
  • Have been confirmed to have HbA1c of >7%.
  • KAB score < 50% at baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, lactating or intend to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) or Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
  • Weighing not more than 150% of the desired weight for height.
  • Any pre-existing condition compromising the quality of life or ability to participate according to protocol.
  • Have severe complications (chronic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, diagnosed HIV/AIDS, cancer, emphysema, chronic liver or kidney disease) that would affect the subjects' ability to follow the tailored advice.
  • Enrolled in other clinical studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: e-Intervention group
Receive stage-specific dietary intervention via the website & standard care at the outpatient clinic.
Dietary educational programme developed using Transtheoretical Model of Change and delivered via a website specific for Type 2 Diabetes patients.
No Intervention: Control group
Continue with the standard diabetes care at the outpatient clinic without getting access to the web-based intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Dietary KAB Score at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 6 months
Dietary Knowledge, Attitude & Behaviour Score - assessed using 36-item questionnaire.
Baseline & 6 months
Change from Baseline in Dietary KAB Score at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
Dietary Knowledge, Attitude & Behaviour Score - assessed using 36-item questionnaire.
Baseline & 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in anthropometric measurements at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 6 months
BMI, body fat percentage, waist circumference
Baseline & 6 months
Change from Baseline in anthropometric measurements at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
BMI, body fat percentage, waist circumference
Baseline & 12 months
Change from Baseline in dietary practices at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 6 months
Nutrient intake, dietary GI, supplement intake, food preparation & eating out habit
Baseline & 6 months
Change from Baseline in dietary practices at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
Nutrient intake, dietary GI, supplement intake, food preparation & eating out habit
Baseline & 12 months
Change from Baseline in blood biomarkers at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 6 months
HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile (data to be obtained from the medical records)
Baseline & 6 months
Change from Baseline in blood biomarkers at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile (data to be obtained from the medical records)
Baseline & 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kia Fatt Quek, PhD, Monash University (Sunway Campus)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MED2009-CM(SG)-004-QKF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on e-Intervention

Subscribe