A Study of RO5185426 in Previously Treated Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases

June 26, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Open-label, Pilot Study of RO5185426 in Previously Treated Metastatic Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases

This open-label study will assess the safety and efficacy of RO5185426 in previously treated metastatic melanoma patients with brain metastases. Patients will receive RO5185426 at a dose of 960 mg twice daily orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • CHUV; Departement d'Oncologie
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Universitätsspital Zürich; Dermatologische Klinik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • Metastatic melanoma (Stage IV, American Joint Committee on Cancer) with BRAF mutation (cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test)
  • Brain metastases for which surgical resection is not a treatment option
  • Patients must have failed at least one previous treatment for brain metastases
  • Requiring corticosteroids for symptom control
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Increasing corticosteroid dose during the 7 days prior to study entry
  • Previous malignancy within the past 2 years, except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix
  • Concurrent administration of any anticancer therapies other than those administered in the study
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease or event within the 6 months prior to first dose of study drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single Arm
960 mg b.i.d. orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From baseline up to last dose (0.1 to 11.3 months) plus 28 days
AE:any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with use of study drug, regardless of relation to study drug. Pre-existing conditions that worsened and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as AEs. Serious AE: resulted in death, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically significant. Grade-1:discomfort but no disruption of normal daily activity. Grade-2:discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect daily activity,no intervention indicated.Grade-3:inability to perform normal daily activity,intervention indicated.Grade-4:immediate threat to life or leading to permanent mental or physical condition that prevented performing normal daily activities.Grade 5: death. Any AE included participants with serious and non-serious AE.
From baseline up to last dose (0.1 to 11.3 months) plus 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Disease Site
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Objective response was assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) (Version 1.1). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Best overall response was calculated separately for brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body. Percentage of participants with 95 percent (%) Clopper-Pearson confidence interval (CI) are reported.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Duration of Response by Disease Site
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease or death (up to 16 months)
Duration of response was defined as the time interval between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of progressive disease (PD) or death, only for those participants whose best overall response was CR or PR. CR and PR were assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm), progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Duration of response was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates separately for brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease or death (up to 16 months)
Time to Response by Disease Site
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Time to response was defined as the interval between the date of first treatment and the date of first documentation of CR or PR (whichever occurred first). CR and PR were assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Time of response was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates separately for brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Duration of Stable Disease (SD) by Disease Site
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Duration of SD was defined as the time between the first documented date of SD and date of PD or death from any cause. SD was defined (according to RECIST version 1.1) as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Duration of SD was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates separately for brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Time to New Lesion by Disease Site
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every eighth week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Time to new lesions was defined as the interval between the date of first treatment and the date of first documentation of new lesions. Time to new lesion was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates separately for brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every eighth week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death by Disease Site
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Disease progression (according to RECIST version 1.1) was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study or absolute increase and at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Percentage of participants with disease progression by brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body are reported.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every 8th week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every eighth week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
PFS was defined as the time interval between the date of the first treatment and the date of progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression (according to RECIST version 1.1) was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study or absolute increase and at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates separately for brain, other sites (extracranial) and whole body.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and thereafter every eighth week until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death or other reasons deemed by the investigator (up to 16 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of the study and every 3 months during follow-up (up to 16 months)
Percentage of participants who died due to any reason are reported.
Baseline up to end of the study and every 3 months during follow-up (up to 16 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From start of treatment up to end of the study and every 3 months during follow up (up to 16 months)
OS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. Participants who discontinued the study treatment for any reason other than withdrawal of consent were continued to be followed for survival. The end of study occurred when all participants had been followed for a period of 6 months, had died, withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first. OS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates.
From start of treatment up to end of the study and every 3 months during follow up (up to 16 months)
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Total Daily Dose of Corticosteroids
Time Frame: Baseline, every week during the first 8 weeks and every second week thereafter up to last dose (0.1 to 11.3 months) plus 28 days
An improvement in corticosteroid dose was defined as a dose reduction of at least 33% of baseline dose for at least 28 days or stopping use completely. Percentage of participants and 95% Clopper-Pearson CI are reported.
Baseline, every week during the first 8 weeks and every second week thereafter up to last dose (0.1 to 11.3 months) plus 28 days
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Total Daily Dose of Narcotic Pain Analgesic
Time Frame: Baseline, every week during the first 8 weeks and every second week thereafter up to last dose (0.1 to 11.3 months) plus 28 days
An improvement in narcotic pain analgesics was defined as a dose reduction of at least 33% of baseline dose for at least 28 days or stopping use completely.
Baseline, every week during the first 8 weeks and every second week thereafter up to last dose (0.1 to 11.3 months) plus 28 days
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Assessment of Pain
Time Frame: Baseline; Day 1 of Cycles 2-8 (28-day cycle) and at the end of study visit (up to 16 months)
VAS is a measure of pain intensity. The participant was asked to mark on a 100 mm line where their pain level was on the day they completed the scale. The beginning of the line represented no pain and the end of the line represented maximum pain. Total score ranged from 0 - 100. Reported values are decrease in VAS of greater than (>) 20 mm or >30 mm from baseline.
Baseline; Day 1 of Cycles 2-8 (28-day cycle) and at the end of study visit (up to 16 months)
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Physician's Assessment of Global Performance Status
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 of every 28-day cycle, at end of study and at the 28-day follow-up visit (up to 16 months)
Physician's Assessment of Global Performance Status was assessed on 7 point scale (1- Very much better, 2-Much better, 3-A little better, 4-No change, 5-A little worse, 6-Much worse, 7- Very much worse). An improvement was classed as a difference from baseline of at least -1 point. Percentage of participants with 95% Clopper-Pearson CI were reported for participants with improvement in Physician's Assessment of Global Performance Status at any visit.
Baseline, Day 1 of every 28-day cycle, at end of study and at the 28-day follow-up visit (up to 16 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 22, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Melanoma

Clinical Trials on RO5185426

3
Subscribe