Preconceptional Counselling in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (PreCARA)

April 26, 2016 updated by: J.M.W. Hazes

PreConceptional Counselling in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

The first objective of the study is to evaluate a treat to target treatment strategy in women with moderate to high disease activity of RA and a pregnancy wish, from pre-pregnancy. The treatment strategy is based on deliberate treatment decisions to lower disease activity, including the continuation or start of biological treatment (in particular anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor [anti-TNF]), based on a standard care protocol in the Erasmus MC. The second objective is to evaluate the safety of the use of anti-TNF during pregnancy among women with a rheumatic disease that require the use of anti-TNF before or during pregnancy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is an auto-inflammatory disease that particularly involves chronic inflammation of the joints.The disease is in essence a systemically active one that can affect almost any organ. Pregnancy can spontaneously reduce the activity of RA. This phenomenon has been investigated in the PARA-study (Pregnancy-induced Amelioration of Rheumatoid Arthritis study), a nationwide prospective cohort study initiated and coordinated by the department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam the Netherlands.

The PARA-study reconfirmed previous data that RA improved during pregnancy. However, it also showed that this improvement was less pronounced than previously thought since > 50% of RA-patients still had active disease during third trimester of pregnancy. It also demonstrated that active RA was associated with lower birth weight and that children of mothers with active RA demonstrated rapid catch up growth in weight. Lower birth weight as well as rapid catch up growth in weight have been shown to be associated with a less favorable cardiovascular profile in early adulthood. Finally, it showed that time to pregnancy is prolonged in RA-patients with active disease. Also the use of prednisone > 7,5 mg daily or the use of NSAIDs (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs) were associated with a prolonged time to pregnancy. These latter associations were independent of disease activity.

The findings of the PARA-study implicate that one should strive for low disease activity in women with RA and a pregnancy wish, but that in the meantime NSAIDs and doses of prednisone exceeding 7.5 mg daily should be avoided. Since common drugs to treat RA, like methotrexate, are incompatible with pregnancy, lowering disease activity in pregnant RA-patients or with a pregnancy wish becomes a real challenge for the patient and the treating physician. This all underscores the importance of new treatment modalities for RA-patients with a pregnancy wish.

In the last decade new treatment options for RA, the so-called biologicals, became available. During pregnancy the most experience has been gained with biologicals belonging to the class of anti-TNF therapy. In the USA, anti-TNF has been approved for use during pregnancy as a FDA (Food and Drug Administration) class B (i.e. Animal reproduction studies fail to demonstrate a risk to the fetus, and adequate, but well-controlled, studies of pregnant women have not been conducted). Registry studies show that anti-TNF use seems to be safe during pregnancy in humans also. Furthermore, anti-TNF therapy has been used intentionally preconceptionally to improve the chance of pregnancies in women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Since no randomized controlled trials can be done during pregnancy, circumstantial evidence has led to decision making in daily practice. In case of high disease activity use of anti-TNF to control disease activity outweighs the risk of potential harm to the foetus.

Most anti-TNF medications are monoclonal antibodies of the IgG class. For that reason these antibodies are, from around week 14 of gestation, actively transported across the placenta. When used into third trimester of pregnancy, higher levels of these TNF-alpha antibodies are reached in the fetal circulation compared to the maternal circulation, making the newborn more prone for infections. Vaccination of newborns with live inactivated vaccines are therefore contraindicated till anti-TNF alpha antibody levels are not detectable anymore. It is often advised to stop anti-TNF in the first trimester of pregnancy. The rationale behind this approach is that RA improves during pregnancy anyway and that it is safe to taper off medication. In addition it is thought that with discontinuation of anti-TNFearly during pregnancy no placental transfer of anti-TNF antibodies will take place. However, currently no scientific evidence is available to support both assumptions.

An alternative approach is to prescribe Certolizumab during pregnancy or in women with a pregnancy wish. Certolizumab is a pegylated antibody against TNF-alpha. Since it lacks an Fc-tail it is not transported across the placenta and only trace amounts can be detected in the newborn. In the Erasmus MC a protocol was recently developed to standardize care for patients (already pregnant or with a pregnancy wish) that in theory might benefit from treatment with anti-TNF therapy. This protocol is being evaluated in the Pre-CARA study.

The Pre-CARA study is a continuation of the previous PARA study, but focuses on RA patients with high disease activity and a pregnancy wish. The first objective is to evaluate a treat to target treatment strategy in women with moderate to high disease activity of RA and a pregnancy wish, from pre-pregnancy till six months after delivery. The treatment strategy is based on deliberate treatment decisions to lower disease activity, including the continuation or start of biological treatment (anti-TNF), based on a standard care protocol in the Erasmus MC. The second objective is to evaluate the safety of the use of anti-TNF during in women with any chronic arthritide who require the use of this medication preconceptionally and/or during pregnancy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3000CA
        • Recruiting
        • ErasmusMC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, dept. of Rheumatology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Radboud J. EM Dolhain, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

For first objective: Women with high disease activity of RA and a pregnancy wish.

For second objective: Women with a rheumatic disease that requires the use of anti-TNF before or during pregnancy

Description

Inclusion criteria for first objective (150 subjects)

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis according to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria
  • active pregnancy wish
  • either DAS28(3)CRP > 3.2 or the current use of anti-TNF

Inclusion criteria for second objective (no limit on number of subjects needed, recruitment will end when 150 RA patients have been included)

  • rheumatic disease that requires the use of anti-TNF before or during pregnancy
  • active pregnancy wish

Exclusion criteria:

- none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
RA patients
RA patients with active disease or current use of anti-TNF. Treatment is according to treat to target principles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
DAS28(3)CRP at all study points
Time Frame: Every 3 months from baseline till 6 months after delivery
Every 3 months from baseline till 6 months after delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to pregnancy
Time Frame: At baseline and every 3 months till pregnant
Patient is asked whether is she is pregnant. Pregnancy is defined as positive pregnancy test or ultrasound.
At baseline and every 3 months till pregnant
Number of miscarriages
Time Frame: After conception, every 3 months
Patients normally report miscarriages spontaneously at the next visit after miscarriage or contact the research nurse themselves to report this. If not, and patient is not pregnant anymore, reason for ending of pregnancy will be asked.
After conception, every 3 months
Complications during pregnancy
Time Frame: Every 3 months during pregnancy and first visit after delivery
Complications are: hypertensive disorders, pre-eclampsia, diabetes, mode of delivery, hospitalization
Every 3 months during pregnancy and first visit after delivery
Gestational age of child
Time Frame: First visit after delivery
First visit after delivery
Birth weight of child
Time Frame: First visit after delivery
First visit after delivery
Congenital malformations
Time Frame: First visit after delivery
First visit after delivery
Growth of child and tempo of growth during first year
Time Frame: One year after birth
One year after birth
Maternal serum levels of anti-TNF
Time Frame: Every three months during pregnancy
Every three months during pregnancy
Levels of anti-TNF in cord blood
Time Frame: Collected at birth
Collected at birth
Levels of anti-TNF in child
Time Frame: Every six weeks after birth
Only if anti-TNF in cord blood was above reference value, blood will be drawn from the newborn every six weeks, till anti-TNF-levels are below reference value
Every six weeks after birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Radboud Dolhain, PhD MD, Staff Rheumatologist

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

This will be discussed in the research group

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

3
Subscribe