Management of Hypotension In the Preterm Infant (HIP)

September 30, 2019 updated by: Dr. Gene Dempsey, University College Cork

Management of Hypotension In Preterm Infants: The HIP Trial Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Hypotension Management in the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn

The HIP trial is a large pragmatic, multinational, randomised trial of two different strategies for the management of hypotension in extremely low gestational age newborns (Standard with dopamine versus a restricted with placebo approach).

HYPOTHESIS: A restricted approach to the management of hypotension in extremely low gestational age newborns will result in improved neonatal and long-term developmental outcomes.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a restricted approach to the management of hypotension compared to using dopamine as first line pressor agent in infants born less than 28 weeks of gestation within the first 72 hrs after birth (transitional period), improves survival without significant brain injury at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and improves survival without moderate or severe neurodevelopmental disability at 2 years corrected age.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

While hypotension - low blood pressure (BP) - is commonly diagnosed and treated in the very preterm infant there is enormous variation in clinical practice.Hypotension is statistically associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes however a systematic review of the literature was unable to find clear criteria to define hypotension. In addition the evidence to support current management strategies is minimal and mostly dependent on small studies that have measured short-term physiologic endpoints. Preterm infants who are diagnosed with and treated for low BP often have no biochemical or clinical signs of shock, they may have normal systemic blood flow, low systemic vascular resistance, and adequate tissue oxygen delivery and probably do not require treatment. Careful observation of such infants without intervention approach previously coined "permissive hypotension" may well be appropriate.

Excessive intervention in preterm infants may be unnecessary or even harmful. Analysis of a large neonatal database (Canadian Neonatal Network, CNN) demonstrated that treatment of hypotension was associated with an increase in serious brain injury. This remained true even after mean BP was included in the regression model suggesting that it may be the treatment of hypotension rather than the presence of hypotension which is harmful. The most common approach to treatment is to give one or more fluid boluses followed by dopamine. However, observational data have shown an association of fluid bolus administration with intracranial bleeding and in animal models correction of hypotension by rapid volume infusion can result in intraventricular haemorrhage; a complication which is associated with increased rates of death and neurosensory impairment in preterm human infants. Fluctuations in BP following commencement of inotropes are well recognised and could also trigger intraventricular haemorrhage. Furthermore dopamine the most commonly used inotrope has effects on many physiologic functions including pituitary effects which lead to secondary hypothyroidism a known risk factor for poor long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in the preterm infant. In addition dopamine elevates BP in the newborn predominantly due to vasoconstriction, which may be associated with a reduction in systemic perfusion.

There is no consensus on definitions of hypotension in the preterm infant. Many clinicians rely on absolute BP values alone to guide intervention. BP reference ranges are often based on birth weight, gestational age and postnatal age criteria. These statistically determined values vary considerably being based on observations of BP made in small cohorts of infants the majority of whom were born before the widespread implementation of important perinatal interventions (e.g antenatal glucocorticoid therapy) which are known to improve outcome and reduce the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants. The Joint Working Group of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine has recommended that the mean arterial BP in mmHg should be maintained above the gestational age in weeks (e.g. an infant born at 25 weeks gestation should have a mean BP > 25mmHg). Despite little published evidence to support this 'rule', it remains the most common criterion used to define hypotension and it has been used in a number of recent randomised therapeutic intervention trials where it was the sole entry criteria. However, Cunningham et al have shown a poor relationship between this criterion and the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants. In a separate study, the CNN report that 52% of preterm infants with birth weight < 1500g have a mean arterial BP less than their gestational age on the first day of life and thus may be diagnosed with and treated for hypotension.

It is uncertain whether hypotension (however defined) results in adverse clinical outcomes including adverse short-term outcomes (increased incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage) and adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore it is unclear whether intervention to treat hypotension results in improved outcomes. Dopamine is the most commonly used agent, an endogenous catecholamine that causes vasoconstriction and elevates BP, but has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Epinephrine is another endogenous catecholamine, which at low to moderate doses causes vasodilatation and stimulates cardiac function. It may increase perfusion when used in hypotensive neonates but the data are limited.

Current standard approaches to evaluation and treatment of transitional circulatory problems in the preterm infant are not evidence based. It is essential that these approaches be adequately investigated in this at risk group of infants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Edegem
      • Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium, B-2650
        • University Hospital Antwerp
    • Leuven
      • Oude God, Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2R3
        • University of Alberta
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C9
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
      • Prague, Czechia, 11636
        • Univerzita Karlova v Praze
      • Cork, Ireland
        • Cork University Maternity Hospital
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • University College Dublin
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
    • Dublin
      • Dublin 8, Dublin, Ireland, 8
        • Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital
      • Belfast, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA
        • Royal Maternity Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 months to 10 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Gestational age at birth less than 28 completed weeks, i.e. up to and including 27 weeks and 6 days.
  2. Within 72 hours of birth
  3. An indwelling arterial line, either umbilical or peripheral (e.g. radial, posterior tibial), suitably calibrated and zeroed, to monitor BP with the measuring dome at the level of the infant's mid-axillary line when supine
  4. A pre-trial cerebral ultrasound scan demonstrating no evidence of grade 3 or 4 haemorrhage intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)(i.e. intraparenchymal echodensity or echolucency, with or without acquired cerebral ventriculomegaly)
  5. A mean blood pressure 1 mmHg or more below a mean BP value equivalent to the gestational age in completed weeks, which persists over a 15 minute period (mean BP < gestational age)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Considered non-viable by attending clinicians.
  2. Life-threatening congenital abnormalities including congenital heart disease (excluding patent ductus arteriosus, small atrial and/or ventricular septal defect). Infants known to require surgical treatment e.g. congenital diaphragmatic hernia, trache-oesophageal fistula, omphalocele, gastroschisis. Neuromuscular disorders. Frank hypovolaemia. Hydrops Fetalis.
  3. Cranial ultrasound abnormality grade 3 IVH or more prior to enrolment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: dextrose 5%
IV Infusion
IV Infusion Minimum dose = 5mcg/kg/min Maximum dose = 20mcg/kg/min
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Experimental: Dopamine Hydrochloride
IV Infusion
Active drug substance 1.5 mg in 1 mL IV Infusion Minimum dose = 5mcg/kg/min Maximum dose = 20mcg/kg/min
Other Names:
  • ATC Code: C01CA04

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First Co-Primary Outcome Measure: Survival to 36 weeks postmenstrual age free of severe brain injury
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Survival to 36 weeks postmenstrual age free of severe brain injury (moderate or severe ventricular dilatation, intracerebral echodense lesions, and cystic periventricular leukomalacia) on cranial ultrasound at 36 weeks or discharge home which ever is the earlier.
36 weeks
Second Co-Primary Outcome Measure: Survival without moderate or serious disability as defined using consensus criteria for neurodevelopmental impairment.
Time Frame: 2 years of age
Families will be offered routine appointments as per the local follow-up system. At 12-months, the physician will complete a simple disability assessment and all surviving infants will have a locally performed formal neurodisability assessment at 24 months age corrected for weeks of prematurity defined using criteria set out in the consensus statement "Health status...." (ww bapm.org/publications).
2 years of age

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
All cause mortality at 36 weeks gestational age
Time Frame: 36 weeks gestational age
36 weeks gestational age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eugene Dempsey, University College Cork
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Filan, Cork University Maternity Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Gunnar Naulaers, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Zybnek Stranak, Univerzita Karlova v Praze
  • Principal Investigator: Keith Barrington, St. Justine's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Colm O Donnell, University College Dublin
  • Principal Investigator: Jan Miletin, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Po-Yin Cheung, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: David Corcoran, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  • Principal Investigator: Neil Marlow, University College, London
  • Principal Investigator: Gerard Pons, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
  • Principal Investigator: David Van Laere, Neonatale Intensieve Zorgen
  • Principal Investigator: David Millar, Royal Maternity Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypotension

Clinical Trials on Dextrose 5%

3
Subscribe