Early Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children Pilot Study (WeeHab in PCCU)

November 4, 2013 updated by: McMaster University

Early Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children, a Pilot Study

Critically ill patients are often confined to bedrest, because of the nature of their illness. However, it has now been shown that prolonged bedrest and immobility, particularly in critically ill adults and children, can lead to serious outcomes such as muscle weakness and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Research in adults has demonstrated that preventing immobility and introducing exercise and rehabilitation in adult patients early during their ICU illness can prevent these serious outcomes, reduce the duration of hospital stay, and enhance their recovery after they leave the ICU. The purpose of our research is to investigate if early mobilization and rehabilitation can also be performed in critically ill children, and eventually evaluate this results in beneficial outcomes in these children, as it has been shown to be in adults. However, given that children are not the same as adults, but have varying abilities to understand and participate in activities when they are sick, the investigators first have to evaluate the most appropriate and safe ways of helping children "exercise" while they are in the ICU. This objective of this study is to evaluate if 2 methods of rehabilitation (a stationary bike and interactive video game) can be implemented in critically ill children. These methods have been used in hospitalized children and in critically ill adults. The investigators will evaluate if these methods are safe for critically ill children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this prospective cohort pilot study, eligible critically ill children aged 3 to 17 years will receive in addition to their usual care, a passive and/or an active mobility intervention, depending on their level of consciousness or cognitive ability. The active intervention will consist of an interactive video game (X Box 360 Kinect), while a cycle ergometer will be used as the passive intervention. The mobility interventions will be applied for a minimum of 10 minutes on day 1, and 20 minutes on day 2. For unconscious patients, or eligible patients who cognitively impaired, the passive intervention will be applied. As soon as the patient is conscious and cooperative, the active intervention will be applied.

The primary outcomes of interest in this pilot study are feasibility (defined as the ability to screen and enroll patients, consent rate and protocol adherence). Secondary outcomes of interest include safety outcomes, clinical outcomes and patient and caregiver satisfaction with the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • McMaster Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Anticipated PCCU stay of more than 24 hours.
  2. Clinical stable children at PCCU
  3. Informed consent and or assent where appropriate
  4. Agreement of the most responsible PCCU physician
  5. Age ≥ 3years to < 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hemodynamic instability, defined as requiring escalation in vasoactive agents or volume resuscitation within the preceding 4 hours. (Patients who are on stable or weaning doses of vasoactive agents will be considered eligible).
  2. Anticipated death and/ or withholding of life-sustaining therapies
  3. The presence of a contraindication to mobilization- e.g. Suspected or actual evidence of cerebral edema or elevated ICP, unstable spinal cord injuries, musculoskeletal injuries/ fixed deformities in the lower limbs (for the use of cycle ergometer) or the upper limbs (for the use of interactive video-gaming)
  4. Unstable airway (defined as impending respiratory failure and/or endotracheal intubation is anticipated within the next 4 hours).
  5. Patients who are already mobilizing well/or at their baseline level of function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single Arm: Study Intervention
Cycle ergometry and/or Interactive video-game
  1. Passive mobility: cycle ergometer
  2. Active mobility: interactive video-game (X Box 360 Kinect) Each intervention will be applied for a maximum of 2 days respectively. If a participant is unconscious on Day 1 and receives the passive intervention, and thereafter becomes alert and cooperative on day 2, then he/she can receive the active intervention.
Other Names:
  • Cycle Ergometer
  • X Box 360 Kinect

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: 2 days

The primary outcome of interest in this pilot study is feasibility. Feasibility is defined as follows:

  1. The ability to screen and enroll eligible patients - enrolment rate of at least 70% of those approached for consent (benchmark for PCCU trials)
  2. Time to application of acute rehabilitation intervention.
  3. Protocol adherence - a protocol violation rate of < 10%.
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety
Time Frame: Study period
The proportion of patients with adverse events attributable to the rehabilitation intervention (e.g. cardiorespiratory events, tube dislodgement's).
Study period
Change in activity from baseline
Time Frame: From baseline to end of intervention
Change in activity from baseline, during and following the intervention as measured by accelerometer, and patient
From baseline to end of intervention
Caregiver/user perception of intervention
Time Frame: At end of study period
Self-administered survey of caregiver and or user, to evaluate perceptions of intervention
At end of study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen Choong, MB, BCh, MSc, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12-008

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Early Rehabilitation intervention

Subscribe