Neurofeedback as a Treatment Tool for Depression (NFD)

December 13, 2016 updated by: David Linden, Cardiff University

fMRI Based Neurofeedback as a Treatment Method for Depression

The purpose of the study is to investigate whether neurofeedback delivered via functional magnetic resonance imaging signals can be used to train depressed patients to self-regulate emotion networks and whether this improves clinical symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wales
      • Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom, CF14 4XN
        • School of Medicine, Cardiff University
      • Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom, CF103AT
        • CUBRIC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis
  • stable antidepressant dose medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other physical or psychiatric disorders
  • Current substance abuse
  • Current psychotherapy or other specific intervention
  • Exclusion criteria applicable to MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Emotion network up-regulation
Participants use fMRI-based neurofeedback to train the upregulation of brain areas that respond to positive affective pictures (as identified during a functional localiser scan).
5 sessions lasting one hour each
Active Comparator: Place processing network up-regulation
Participants use fMRI-based neurofeedback to train the upregulation of brain areas that respond to place and house pictures (as identified during a functional localiser scan).
5 sessions lasting one hour each

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Before start trial (baseline), after intervention (appr. 2 months)
Before start trial (baseline), after intervention (appr. 2 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety score at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety score at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression score at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression score at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 dimensions scale (EQ-5D) at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 dimensions scale (EQ-5D) at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the Self-efficacy-scale (general subscale: GSE) at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Self-efficacy-scale (general subscale: GSE) at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the Self-efficacy-scale (social subscale: SSE) at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Self-efficacy-scale (social subscale: SSE) at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the Thought control questionnaire (TCQ) at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Thought control questionnaire (TCQ) at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the Thought control ability questionnaire (TCAQ) at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Thought control ability questionnaire (TCAQ) at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the Behavioural inhibition system and behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS), BAS scale, at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Behavioural inhibition system and behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS), BAS scale, at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change from Baseline in the Behavioural inhibition system and behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS), BIS scale, at the end of intervention (after 5th session)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Baseline, end of intervention (appr. 2 months)
Change from Baseline in the Behavioural inhibition system and behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS), BIS scale, at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months follow-up
Baseline, 3-months follow-up
Change from Baseline in health service resource use as measured with a Resource Use Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months follow-up
Baseline, 3-months follow-up
Change from before to after scan in the Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Time Frame: Before and after each scanning session (appr. 2 months: session 1: week 1; session 2: week 2; session 3: week 3; session 4: week 4; session 5: week 8)
Measure to address any imminent changes in mood state.
Before and after each scanning session (appr. 2 months: session 1: week 1; session 2: week 2; session 3: week 3; session 4: week 4; session 5: week 8)
Relation between upregulation ability of target areas (as obtained by functional MRI analysis) and perceived self control
Time Frame: Integrating imaging and psychometric data across the intervention period (appr. 2 months)
Analysis of the relationship between scores on the self-efficacy scales, thought control questionnaire (TCQ), thought control ability questionnaire (TCAQ) and the behavioural inhibition system and behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS) scales and fMRI data.
Integrating imaging and psychometric data across the intervention period (appr. 2 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David E Linden, MD, Cardiff University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SPON927-11
  • G 1100629 (Other Grant/Funding Number: MRC)
  • HS/10/25 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NISCHR)
  • 11/WA/0106 (Other Identifier: NHS Research Ethics Committee)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unipolar Depression

Clinical Trials on fMRI-based neurofeedback

3
Subscribe