Vascularized Free Fibula Flap and Computer-guided Implant Surgery

March 21, 2012 updated by: MICHELE DE BENEDITTIS, University of Bari

Long-term Results of Mandibular/Maxillary Reconstruction With Vascularized Free Fibula Flap and Computer-guided Implant Surgery

The rehabilitation of patients affected by defects of the jaws after tumor resection is still very challenging. Resection can lead to significant facial deformity, impaired oral functions such as speech, swallowing, saliva retention, and concomitant psychological problems. Moreover, the loss of teeth and the alveolar and basal jawbone can lead to significant impairment of mastication. The reconstruction of such defects with autogenous bone grafts or revascularized free flaps has become a valuable means for the rehabilitation of these patients. Major benefits of such procedure include an usually low morbidity of the donor site and an extensive length of the bone graft. Moreover, vascularized grafts provide a good bulk of bone in which to place implants and a satisfactory contour. In fact, after reconstruction, local hard and soft tissue conditions often exclude the integration of conventional dentures because of the impairment of dental prosthetic retention by thin cutaneous tissue, the thickness of subcutaneous tissues, the absence of a perilingual and vestibular groove, and the fragility of soft tissues. In Literature it has been well established the high biologic value of vascularized fibula grafts regarding the potential of implant osseointegration, which seemed to be equal to regional mandibular or maxillary bone and eventually capable to provide sufficient stabilization of prosthesis.

It must be kept in mind that the final prosthetic success may be affected by some difficulties in this clinical scenario. These include the limited opening of the scar-contracted oral cavity, the huge amount of soft tissue covering the fibula, with little information about the profile of the underlying harvested bone, the need for limited bony exposure in a field that may well have been irradiated and they all may cause poor prosthetically-guided implant positioning and eventually disappointing results in dental rehabilitation, either functionally or esthetically. It can be postulated that these complications can be overcome, or at least reduced, by adopting the new methods of computed tomography (CT)-assisted implant surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

5

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bari
      • Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy, 70021
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale regionale F. Miulli
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • MICHELE DE BENEDITTIS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with free fibula flaps for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with free fibula flaps for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction needing full arch or quasi full arch rehabilitation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • radiation therapy
  • malignant tumor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of peri-implant bone level from baseline at 12 and 24 months
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months

successful implants will be those with peri-implant bone resorption less than 1.5 mm in the first year of function and less than

0.2 mm in the subsequent years

12 months and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
12 months and 24 months
peri-implant infection
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
12 months and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MICHELE DE BENEDITTIS, RESEARCHER, University of Bari

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Tumor

Subscribe