Non-Interventional Study of NovoSeven® Used in Patients With Haemophilia A and B With Inhibitors When Undergoing Surgery

February 23, 2017 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S
This study is conducted in Japan. The aim of this non-interventional study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of treatment with eptacog alpha (NovoSeven®) when undergoing surgery under normal clinical practice conditions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan, 1000005
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with haemophilia A and B with inhibitors who received NovoSeven® (eptacog alpha) as treatment when undergoing the surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with haemophilia A and B with inhibitors who received eptacog alpha (NovoSeven®) as treatment when undergoing surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who was not deemed to be appropriate to the treatment of eptacog alpha (NovoSeven®)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
eptacog alpha users
Safety and effectiveness data collection in connection with the use of eptacog alpha in daily clinical practice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Physician's assessment of the evaluation for efficacy: Amount of blood at surgery, condition of haemostasis after surgery or maintenance of cessation of bleed
Time Frame: Year 1
Year 1
Physician's assessment of the evaluation for efficacy: Amount of blood at surgery, condition of haemostasis after surgery or maintenance of cessation of bleed
Time Frame: Year 10
Year 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Year 1, Year 10
Year 1, Year 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 1999

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Bleeding Disorder

Clinical Trials on eptacog alfa (activated)

Subscribe