Acute Effect of Animal and Vegetable Protein Rich Meals With Comparable Dietary Fibers Content on Appetite Sensation and Energy Intake (PAVA-II)

June 29, 2016 updated by: Arne Astrup, University of Copenhagen

Background:

  • New Nordic diet guidelines advocate a reduction in consumption of protein from animal sources such as beef and pork, due to environmental concerns.
  • Instead, intake of protein from vegetable sources such as legumes and pulses should be increased.
  • A previous study showed that a meal enriched with vegetable protein increased the subjective sensation of satiety and decreased hunger and ad libitum energy intake (EI) compared to animal protein.
  • This study did, however, not document that vegetable protein per se is more satiating than animal protein as the vegetable meal had higher fiber content. Fiber is a likely confounder.
  • The protein from egg is sparingly investigated in relation to appetite. Few studies have found that eggs have a high satiety index but further investigation is needed.

Objective:

- To examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum energy intake) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers.

Design:

Single-blind randomized 4-way crossover meal study

Subjects:

33 young healthy men (Age: 18-50 years; BMI: 19-30 kg/m2). Expected completers: n=30.

End points:

  1. Subjective appetite (VAS) (every 30 min for 3 hours)
  2. Ad libitum EI (3 hours after lunch test meal)

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Frederiksberg, Denmark, 1958
        • Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy
  • BMI: 18.5-30.0 kg/m2
  • Weight stable (within +/- 3 kg) two months prior to study inclusion,
  • Non-smoking
  • Nonathletic (< 10 h hard physical activity)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 30 kg/m2
  • Change in smoking status
  • Daily or frequent use of medication that can affect appetite
  • Suffering from metabolic diseases
  • Suffering from psychiatric diseases
  • Suffering from any other clinical condition, which would make the subject unfit to participate in the study
  • alcohol and drug abuse
  • food allergies or relevance for the test meals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vegetable protein meal
Vegetable protein meal based on legumes (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 28 g dietary fibers)
4-arm crossover study with the objective to examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum EI) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers.
Experimental: Egg protein meal + fibers
Protein meal based on eggs and added pea dietary fibers (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 28 g dietary fibers)
4-arm crossover study with the objective to examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum EI) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers.
Experimental: Egg protein meal
Protein meal based on egg without added dietary fibers (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 6 g dietary fibers)
4-arm crossover study with the objective to examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum EI) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers.
Experimental: Meat protein meal + fibers
Protein meal based on meat and added pea dietary fibers (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 29 g dietary fibers)
4-arm crossover study with the objective to examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum EI) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ad libitum energy intake
Time Frame: Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test day is separated by >1 week. Assessed 180 min after each of the 4 test meals.
180 min after each test meal an ad libitum meal of spaghetti bolognese is served, and the total energy intake is recorded.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test day is separated by >1 week. Assessed 180 min after each of the 4 test meals.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute 3-h changes from baseline in subjective appetite sensations using visual analogue scales
Time Frame: Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test day is separated by >1 week. On each test day appetite sensations are measured prior to the test meal (time 0) and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes post intake
Assessment of subjective appetite sensations (visual analogue scales (VAS)) at time 0 (baseline - prior to the test meal) and at time 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes post intake. Measured subjective appetite sensations of hunger, satiety, prospective consumption, fullness, composite appetite score and sensory desires to something sweet, salty, rich in fat, or meat/fish.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test day is separated by >1 week. On each test day appetite sensations are measured prior to the test meal (time 0) and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes post intake
Rating of the organoleptic quality of the test meals
Time Frame: Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. On each test day after completion of the test meal subjects will rate the test meal
After completion of the test meal the subjects will rate the organoleptic quality of the drink by visual analogue scales (VAS) in regard to appearance, smell, taste, after-taste, and general palatability.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. On each test day after completion of the test meal subjects will rate the test meal
Rating of the organoleptic quality of the ad libitum meal
Time Frame: Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. On each test day after completion of the ad libitum meal (approximately) time 15-20 minutes post intake) subjects will rate the ad libitum meal
After completion of the adlibitum meal the subjects will rate the organoleptic quality of the meal by visual analogue scales (VAS) in regard to appearance, smell, taste, after-taste, and general palatability.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. On each test day after completion of the ad libitum meal (approximately) time 15-20 minutes post intake) subjects will rate the ad libitum meal
Subjective appetite sensations (visual analogue scales) after ad libitum meal
Time Frame: Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. After completion of the ad libitum meal subjects will rate their subjective sensation of appetite (approx 3.5-h post intake of test meal)
After completion of the ad libitum meal the subjects will rate the subjective appetite sensations by visual analogue scales (VAS) in regard to sensation of hunger, satiety, prospective consumption, fullness, composite appetite score and sensory desires to eat something sweet, salty, rich in fat, or meat/fish.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. After completion of the ad libitum meal subjects will rate their subjective sensation of appetite (approx 3.5-h post intake of test meal)
Compensatory food intake (weighed dietary food record)
Time Frame: Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. Participants fill in a weighed food record from the time they complete the lunch until midnight.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. Participants fill in a weighed food record from the time they complete the lunch until midnight.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne B Raben, PhD, Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B294

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

3
Subscribe