- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01671059
A Non-Interventional Study Evaluating Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants Treated With Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra)
January 6, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Multi-Center, Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab (ACROSS)
This non-interventional study evaluated the use and efficacy of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Eligible participants initiated on tocilizumab treatment according to the approved label were followed for 6 months.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
80
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
-
Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
- Military Medical Academy; Clinic of Rheumatology
-
Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
- Institut Za Reumatologiju; Reumatologiju
-
Niska Banja, Serbia, 18205
-
Niska Banja, Serbia, 18205
- Institute of Rheumatology and Cardiovascular Diseases; Rheumatology
-
Novi Sad, Serbia, 21000
-
Novi Sad, Serbia, 21000
- Special Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Novi Sad
-
Novi Sad, Serbia, 21000
- Clinical Center Voivodina; Clinic for Immunology and Nephrology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis initiated on treatment with tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra)
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Participants in whom the treating physician made the decision to commence tocilizumab treatment (in accordance with the local label); this could include participants who had received tocilizumab treatment within 8 weeks prior to the enrollment visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who had received tocilizumab more than 8 weeks prior to the enrollment visit
- Participants who had previously received tocilizumab in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
- Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever was longer) before starting treatment with tocilizumab
- History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Tocilizumab
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving tocilizumab either as combination therapy or monotherapy through routine clinical practice.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab 6 Months After Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab After Failing Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab After Failing Other Biologic Agents
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
Reasons for Dose Modifications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Dose Interruptions
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy at Study Entry
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; in millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog assessment [VAS]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
|
6 months
|
Percentage of Participants on Combination Therapy Achieving a Response by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Percentage of participants achieving a response by EULAR category, including moderate, good, or no response.
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached.
Good response: change from baseline <-1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤3.2; Moderate response: change from baseline <-1.2 with DAS28 scores >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or >5.1, or a change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2 and >3.2 to ≤5.1;
No response: change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1, or a change from baseline ≥-0.6 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2, >3.2 to ≤ 5.1, or >5.1.
|
6 months
|
Percentage of Participants on Monotherapy Achieving a Response by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Percentage of participants achieving a response by EULAR category, including moderate, good, or no response.
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached.
Good response: change from baseline <-1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤3.2; Moderate response: change from baseline <-1.2 with DAS28 scores >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or >5.1, or a change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2 and >3.2 to ≤5.1;
No response: change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1, or a change from baseline ≥-0.6 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2, >3.2 to ≤ 5.1, or >5.1.
|
6 months
|
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is an index for measuring disease activity in RA and has a good correlation with the DAS28.
The index is calculated using the following formula: SDAI: swollen joint count (SJC28) + tender joint count (TJC28) + physician global assessment (PGA) (10 cm visual analogue scale [VAS]) + PhGA (10 cm VAS + C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in milligrams/liter (mg/L).
VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity).
Scores range from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity.
|
6 months
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is an index for measuring disease activity in RA.
The index was calculated using the following formula: CDAI = number of swollen joints using the 28-joint count (SJC28) + number of tender joints using the 28-joint count (TJC28) + patient global assessment of disease (PGA) based on 10 centimeter [cm] Visual Analog Scale [VAS] + physician global assessment of disease (PhGA) based on 10 cm VAS.
VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity).
Total CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
|
6 months
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response
Time Frame: 6 months
|
ACR response was calculated based on total joint count evaluation and other clinical and laboratory assessments.
A positive ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement (reduction) compared to baseline in swollen joint count (28 joints) and tender joint count (28 joints) and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's global assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity (PGH), physician's global assessment of disease activity (PhGH) (all 3 assessed at 0 [good] to 100 mm [worst] VAS scale); participant assessment of disability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (assessed on a 0 to 3 scale, where higher scores represented higher disease activity); acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR).
A reduction in the level of and acute phase reactants was considered an improvement.
ACR50 and ACR70 require a 50% and 70% improvement from baseline, respectively.
|
6 months
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
An AESI includes serious/medically significant infections; opportunistic infections; cases of elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), in combination with either elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice; suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; myocardial infarction /acute coronary syndrome; gastrointestinal perforations; malignancies; anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity reactions (including injection site reactions); demyelinating disorders; stroke; serious/medically significant bleeding events; or serious/medically significant hepatic events.
|
6 months
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The Patient Global Assessment of disease activity provides an overall assessment of how RA affects the participant using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates they are managing very well and 100 indicates they are managing very poorly.
A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
|
6 months
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The HAQ is a participant self-reported questionnaire for assessing the extent of the participant's functional ability.
It consists of 20 questions in 8 categories (dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, reach, grip, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities).
Each question has 4 response options, ranging from 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do.
The HAQ scale is an average of all the scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where higher scores represent higher disease activity.
|
6 months
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Fatigue
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The VAS-fatigue provides an overall assessment of the level of fatigue that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no fatigue, and 100 indicates extreme fatigue.
A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
|
6 months
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Morning Stiffness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was as limber as he/she would be during a day involving typical activities.
Morning stiffness was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0= none and 100= very severe.
|
6 months
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The VAS-Pain provides an overall assessment of the severity of pain that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates unbearable pain.
A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 22, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
August 23, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 23, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 6, 2017
Last Verified
January 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ML28314
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal...Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiCompleted
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis | Juvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisMexico
-
Hamad Medical CorporationUnknownRHEUMATOID ARTHRITISQatar