Person-centred Support for Women After Treatment for Gynaecological Cancer (PESU)

January 14, 2016 updated by: Mette Linnet Olesen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Person-centred Support for Women in the Follow-up Period After Surgical Treatment for Gynaecological Cancer - a Randomised Controlled Trial

Women treated for gynaecological cancer perceive many difficulties in life on the personal, social, and physical levels. Today they are offered a 3 to 5 year follow-up programme at the hospital where the main purpose is to improve survival. However, the women are very nervous before follow-up visits and although they feel safe about them, they express that their needs of psychosocial care and self-management support are not fulfilled.

The proposed study will test a person-centred intervention tailored the women's needs in a randomised controlled trial. The intervention will be based on the method Guided Self Determination (GSD), which has proved able to realize empowerment in practice in relationships between patients and healthcare professionals. GSD involves systematic use of condition-adjusted worksheets ('reflection sheets'), and advanced professional communication. Using reflection sheets filled out by each woman as the starting point for communication, problem solving will be tailored her personal needs. We expect that the intervention has the potential to support the women in better managing specific complications and difficulties related to concerns about recovery, body perception, fertility and establishment of intimate relations with their partner, all aspects important for the women's quality of life in the follow-up period after cancer diagnosis and treatment. The study will be the first to test GSD in cancer patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Copenhagen Ø
      • Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, 2100
        • Gynaecological Department, Juliane Marie Centret,Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women only surgically treated for cervix, ovarian (including borderline tumors), endometrial or vulva cancer, who attend follow up at the Gynaecological Department at The University Hospital Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen.
  • The women should read, write and understand the danish language.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Known recurrence.
  • Participation in the preliminary pilotstudy.
  • Health related problems both physical or psychological, that prevent participation. For example cognitive impairment, or patients with psychiatric diseases that is estimated to require nurses with competences within the psychiatric speciality.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Standard of care.
Experimental: Autonomy-supportive counselling
2-4 autonomy-supportive conversations with an experienced nurse, educated both theoretically and practically in the method Guided Self-Determination that includes specific "reflection sheets" and use of advanced communication; in addition to standard care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Outcome: Quality of life measured by the scale Quality of life- Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS)
Time Frame: 9 months after randomisation
+/- one week for practical reasons
9 months after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life measured by the scale Quality of Life Cancer Survivors- (QOL-CS)
Time Frame: 3 months after randomisation
+/- one week for practical reasons
3 months after randomisation
Changes in Quality of life in the two groups
Time Frame: 9 months
Quality of life at 9 months minus the quality of life at the time of randomisation.
9 months
Positive and negative impact of cancer measured by Impact of Cancer version 2 (IOCv2)
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months after randomisation
+/- one week for practical reasons
3 and 9 months after randomisation
Self-esteem measured by Rosenbergs Self Esteem Scale
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months after randomisation
+/- one week for practical reasons
3 and 9 months after randomisation
Anxiety and depression measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months from randomisation

Also used as screening instrument baseline.

+/- one week for practical reasons

3 and 9 months from randomisation
Autonomy-supportive relationship between patient and health care professionals measured by Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ)
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months from randomisation
+/- one week for practical reasons
3 and 9 months from randomisation
Distress measured by Distress Thermometer(DT).
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months from randomisation

Also used as screening instrument baseline.

+/- one week for practical reasons.

3 and 9 months from randomisation
Symptom monitoring and recognition
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months after randomisation (+/- one week for practical reasons)
Womens ability to know what symptoms to monitor and react to in case of recurrence
3 and 9 months after randomisation (+/- one week for practical reasons)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe