Integrated Collaborative Care for Substance Use Disorders (SUMMIT)

April 25, 2017 updated by: RAND

Primary care settings (PCS) are a missed opportunity for delivering evidence-based treatments for opiate and alcohol-use disorders (OAUD). The investigators propose to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of two strategies to increase the delivery of OAUD treatments in PCS, integrated collaborative care (ICC) and education and resources (E&R). The investigators hypothesize that ICC will be more effective than E&R in promoting A. Implementation outcomes B. Service system outcomes and C. Patient outcomes.

Results from our study will help providers choose between two different strategies and advance the field of implementation research.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Most individuals with opiate and alcohol-use disorders (OAUD) do not receive treatment. Primary care is an ideal setting in which to deliver OAUD treatment, yet evidence-based OAUD treatment is rarely provided.

Barriers to delivery include insufficient organizational support and lack of provider role models and clinical support. The investigators propose to evaluate the effectiveness of two strategies for increasing use of evidence-based treatment for OAUD within primary care: integrated collaborative care (ICC) and education and resources (E&R). While both strategies provide primary care practices with the same clinical information, ICC addresses these barriers by including organizational and technical support for delivering evidence-based care. ICC is grounded in the chronic care model and includes a behavioral health provider working as part of the care team.

Essential elements of ICC strategy include a decision support component to help providers with complex patients, and a restructuring of the delivery and clinical information systems to support the delivery of evidence-based care. Our approach to implementing ICC is based on the organizational transformation model and quality improvement. The investigators define the E&R strategy as providing printed educational materials and access to resources along with provider education. Both strategies are designed to increase the delivery of two evidence-based practices: motivational enhancement therapy and medication assisted therapy.

The investigators propose a 5-year mixed methods study and will conduct a RCT, with randomization occurring at the level of the care team and patient. The investigators partner with 5 Venice Family Clinic (VFC) clinics, two hospitals in LA County, and COPE Health Solutions. VFC is a large federally qualified health center (FQHC) and the largest free clinic in the United States. Our approach includes document review, focus groups, interviews, and surveys for obtaining data on the adoption process and implementation outcomes; analysis of patient records and patient surveys on service system and patient outcomes; and analysis of provider financial records and patient records and surveys for estimating costs. The investigators will enroll 400 patients with an OAUD diagnosis and follow them at 3 and 12 months. Our specific aims are: 1) To measure the process and extent of ICC and E&R implementation; 2) To test the effectiveness of ICC compared to an E&R strategy in promoting A. Implementation outcomes B. Service system outcomes and C. Patient outcomes; and 3) To estimate provider costs for each strategy. The investigators define implementation outcomes as measures of the acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability of evidence-based OAUD treatment. The investigators define service system outcomes as 1) process measures of treatment quality and 2) treatment co-morbidities. The investigators define patient outcomes as hospital readmissions, OAUD outcomes, patient functioning, negative consequences from substance use, and unmet need. The investigators define cost outcomes as start-up costs, operating costs and medical/psychiatric cost offsets.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

397

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90405
        • Venice Family Clinic-Simms Mann Health Center
      • Venice, California, United States, 90291
        • Venice Family Clinic-Rose lAvenue

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • opiate or alcohol use disorder
  • not currently in substance use disorder treatment
  • past 30 day use of alcohol or opioids
  • English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • co-morbid severe mental illness
  • medically unstable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ICC
Integrated collaborative care
Active Comparator: E&R
Education and Resources--enhanced usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
unmet need
Time Frame: past 6 months
Of those identified as screening positive for an opiate or alcohol use disorder, proportion who did not receive treatment for their substance use
past 6 months
abstinent from alcohol and opioid use, past 30 days
Time Frame: past 30 days
change in abstinence from alcohol and opioid use between baseline and 6 month follow up
past 30 days
negative consequences related to substance use
Time Frame: past 3 months
SIP-AD frequency questionnaire
past 3 months
Functioning
Time Frame: past 4 weeks
change in SF-12 between baseline and follow up
past 4 weeks
Engagement
Time Frame: 30 days of initiation
Proportion with at least 2 SUD-related visits within 30 days of initiation, Washington Circle
30 days of initiation
initiation
Time Frame: Within 14 days of index visit
Washington Circle initiation indicator--at least one SUD-related visit within 14 days of index visit
Within 14 days of index visit
heavy alcohol use
Time Frame: 6 months
among people at baseline with heavy alcohol use, proportion with heavy alcohol use in past 30 days
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion initiating Brief therapy
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion initiating brief therapy within 6 months
6 months
Proportion initiating MAT
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion initiating MAT within 6 months, among those eligible for MAT, and if N's are large enough, stratified by type of MAT
6 months
abstinence from alcohol, opioids and all other drugs in the previous 30 days
Time Frame: collected at six months at the past 30 days
abstinence from alcohol, opioids and all other drugs in the past 30 days
collected at six months at the past 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorders

Clinical Trials on Integrated collaborative care

Subscribe