Suicide Treatment and Recovery in Integrated Behavioral Health (STRIBH) (STRIBH)

March 16, 2026 updated by: Kate Comtois, University of Washington
The suicide rate has increased 28% over the past two decades while heart disease, diabetes, and cancer mortality has declined. Starting in 2011, new standards have led to improved adoption and reach of suicide risk surveillance in primary and specialty care. Treatment, however, has lagged. Collaborative Care in primary care settings has demonstrated small but significant reductions in suicidal ideation when a recognized psychological treatment model is included but not when Collaborative Care only includes medication management, suggesting that improvements to psychological treatments in Collaborative Care could further improve suicide outcomes. Developed in a series of conferences in Aeschi Switzerland, the "Aeschi Model" based on the clinical narrative has become an established approach to suicide care endorsed by leaders across the suicidology field - including the developers of major evidence-based suicide interventions. With support from the Methods Core, this Exploratory (R34) study of the University of Washington Suicide Care Research Center (SCRC) will co-design and pilot test the "Connections model" that integrates Aeschi Model with Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health with adolescent and young adult patients (age 13-30 years) who do not require immediate crisis intervention. This study will focus on increasing therapeutic alliance - a key proposed mechanism of the Aeschi approach and the SCRC. The aims of this study are to partner with diverse primary care clinics to conduct a pilot test of the Connections model compared to treatment as usual in six primary care clinics to determine (a) usability and acceptability of the intervention components to patients and providers and (b) the components' potential impact on therapeutic alliance and patient and provider self-efficacy, and (c) potential impact on suicidal outcomes. Given the strong theoretical basis for both the Aeschi Model and Collaborative Care, this proposal has the potential to develop a high impact intervention that will both reduce suicide risk and improve therapeutic alliance - potentially without any increase in the quantity of care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will focus on increasing therapeutic alliance - a key proposed mechanism of the Aeschi approach and the SCRC. The aims of this study are to partner with diverse primary care clinics to conduct a pilot test of the Connections model compared to treatment as usual in six primary care clinics to determine (a) usability and acceptability of the intervention components to patients and providers and (b) the components' potential impact on therapeutic alliance and patient and provider self-efficacy, and (c) potential impact on suicidal outcomes. Given the strong theoretical basis for both the Aeschi Model and Collaborative Care, this proposal has the potential to develop a high impact intervention that will both reduce suicide risk and improve therapeutic alliance - potentially without any increase in the quantity of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 13-30 years of age, experiencing suicidal thoughts or attempted suicide in the past year, not requiring immediate crisis care (as determined by the UW Primary Care team), not enrolled in specialty behavioral health treatment, can read one of the 4 most common languages in Seattle (English, Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese), enrolled in a primary care clinic with an integrated behavioral health provider available to see them, and ability to consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any clinical medical/psychiatric condition, severity of that condition, or life situation that, in the opinion of the primary care or research team, compromises safe and voluntary study participation (e.g., high risk for suicide requiring transfer to higher level of care; physically aggressive, custody conflict)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Treatment as Usual will be whatever primary care and behavioral health services are standardly implemented for adolescents or young adults experiencing suicidality
Experimental: Experimental Condition
The Connections model applies the Aeschi Model of suicide care to Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health by centering the patient's clinical narrative, focusing treatment on the patient's unique drivers of suicide, and maximizing collaboration while maintaining the standards of suicide assessment and management expected by accrediting bodies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: baseline, one month, and two months
Four item scale to measure the acceptability of an intervention
baseline, one month, and two months
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: baseline, one month, and two months
The System Usability Scale is a 10-item measure of the usability of a tool, and is considered the industry standard for measuring usability in the UCD field. A SUS score of 80 is generally seen as a threshold for a highly usable system.
baseline, one month, and two months
Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale
Time Frame: baseline, one month and two months
This measure assesses the frequency of suicidal ideation on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "never" and 4 indicating "most or all of the time". Higher scores reflect higher severity and frequency of suicidal ideation.
baseline, one month and two months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: baseline, one month and two months
A measure of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Suicide ideation is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with higher numbers reflecting more severe ideation. Suicidal behaviors are count measures, with higher numbers reflecting more attempts.
baseline, one month and two months
Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale
Time Frame: baseline, one month and two months
This measure assesses the frequency of suicidal ideation on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "never" and 4 indicating "most or all of the time". Higher scores reflect higher severity and frequency of suicidal ideation.
baseline, one month and two months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: baseline, one month and two months
A measure of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Suicide ideation is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with higher numbers reflecting more severe ideation. Suicidal behaviors are count measures, with higher numbers reflecting more attempts.
baseline, one month and two months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine A Comtois, PhD, MPH, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00016520
  • P50MH129708 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicidal Ideation and Behavior

Clinical Trials on Connections model

Subscribe