Phase II Study of Neuromuscular Electrical Multisite System on Cardiovascular Effects in Severe Obese Patients (StimobII)

January 27, 2017 updated by: AGIR à Dom

Acute and Medium-term Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Multisite System (Kneehab®) on Cardiovascular Parameters and Induced Muscle Fatigue in Morbidly Obese Patients: Comparison With the Unidirectional Standard Device

The study was designed to test the following hypotheses:

In patients with severe obesity, a multisite electrostimulation session (m-NMES) will induce higher changes in metabolic, inflammatory and cardiovascular parameters and higher increase in muscle strength during stimulated contractions than conventional unidirectional electrostimulation session (c-NMES).

In patients with severe obesity, a six-weeks m-NMES training program will enhance cardiovascular, metabolic and inflammatory parameters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Physical activity is known to reduce cardiovascular risk as far as even minor change in lifestyle could occur. In obesity, physical activity programs remain challenging due to multifactorial causes related to body mass such as shortness of breath, traumatological pain or psychosocial causes. Although neuromuscular electrical stimulation training is presently ignored in the management of obesity, this technique may be appropriate and useful for muscle deconditioning in these patients. Furthermore, direct effects of electrostimulation training program on vascular function have been previously reported in spinal cord injury and chronic heart disease, suggesting that improvement in cardiovascular function may be expected. While a promising new technique of multisite electrical stimulation (the Kneehab® system) has been recently commercialized, few study have investigated the acute effects of electrostimulation on vascular function and not any study report the effects of electrical stimulation in obese patients.

MAIN OUTCOME OF THE ACUTE PHASE STUDY (1st part):To study the effect of multisite electrical stimulation session (m-NMES) on arterial stiffness as compared to conventional unidirectional electrical stimulation session (c-NMES) in patients with severe obesity. Secondary outcomes of the observational study: 1/ To study the effect of m-NMES on endothelial function, blood pressure, systemic inflammation and metabolic status (fasting glucose and insulin) as well as electrically-induced muscle fatigue as compared with c-NMES in patients with morbid obesity. 2/ To study the profile of responders to electrical stimulation according to body composition, 6-minute walking distance, spontaneous physical activity or susceptibility to tolerate electrical stimulation. Response to electrical stimulation will be assessed by an improvement in arterial stiffness after stimulation, if so.

MAIN OUTCOME OF THE INTERVENTIONAL STUDY (2nd part):To study the effect of a multisite electrical stimulation training program (m-NMES) (6 weeks, 30 sessions) on arterial stiffness in patients with severe obesity. Secondary outcomes of the interventional study: To study the effect of m-NMES on endothelial function, blood pressure, systemic inflammation and metabolic status (fasting glucose and insulin) as well as muscle strength, body composition, functional capacity (6-minute walking distance) and spontaneous physical activity, after 15 sessions (3 weeks) and after 30 sessions (6 weeks) of training program. Evaluation of the dose-response to m-NMES training in terms of arterial stiffness and functional capacity.

Expected outcomes: Acute change in arterial stiffness and/or endothelial function is expected after one m-NMES session and/or after c-NMES session. M-NMES session is expected to induce higher changes than c-NMES stimulation session on cardiovascular and muscle parameters. Chronic changes in arterial stiffness and/or endothelial function is expected after 6 weeks of m-NMES training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged over 18 years
  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m²)
  • Not included into exercise training program in the year prior to inclusion- Spontaneous physical activity lower than 160 min wk (i.e. < 30 min/d x 5 d/wk).

Additional Inclusion criteria for the interventional study:

  • Patients with PWV > 9.3 m / s

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Underage- Pregnant or parturient women
  • Persons deprived of their liberty for judicial or administrative reasons, person under a legal protection measure (article L1121-8)
  • Exclusion period in other studies- Person not affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Chronic alcoholism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: m-NMES first
Multisite electrostimulator first (Visit 1) and conventional electrostimulator then (Visit 2)
Other Names:
  • Kneehab(R) Stimulator
Other: c-NMES first
Conventional electrostimulator first (Visit 1) and multisite electrostimulator then (Visit 2)
Other Names:
  • Kneehab(R) Stimulator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta arterial stiffness
Time Frame: Day1 and Day3
Change in carotid-femoral Pulse wave velocity (PWV) after NMES sessions
Day1 and Day3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta pulse arterial tonus (RH-PAT)
Time Frame: Day1 and Day3
change in pulse arterial tonometry after NMES sessions
Day1 and Day3
NMES-induced muscle fatigue
Time Frame: Day1 and Day3
change in maximal voluntary contraction after NMES sessions
Day1 and Day3
Delta blood pressure
Time Frame: Day1 and Day3
changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressures after NMES sessions
Day1 and Day3
Delta plasmatic biomarkers
Time Frame: Day1 and Day3
changes in inflammatory and metabolic plasmatic biomarkers after NMES sessions
Day1 and Day3
Body composition
Time Frame: Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Fat-free mass and fat-free mass indexes assessed by impedancemetry
Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Spontaneous physical activity
Time Frame: Day1 and Day 42
Number of hours per day of physical activity at 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 metabolic equivalent(METS),Number of step per day,using a 7-days actigraphy
Day1 and Day 42
Maximal voluntary contraction
Time Frame: Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Quadriceps peak force
Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Walking distance
Time Frame: Day1 and Day 42
6-minute-walking test
Day1 and Day 42
Arterial stiffness
Time Frame: Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements
Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Pulse artery tone (RH-PAT)
Time Frame: Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Pulse artery tonometry measurement
Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Plasmatic biomarkers
Time Frame: Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers
Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Arterial systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Day1, Day21 and Day 42
Response to m-NMES
Time Frame: Day42
Delta in current intensity during m-NMES between the first to the last session
Day42

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Louis Pépin, MD, PhD, Laboratoire EFCR, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12-AGIR-04

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Multisite NMES training during 6 weeks

3
Subscribe