Non-invasive and Invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease (COMFORT)

May 1, 2018 updated by: Gabija Pundziute, University Medical Center Groningen

Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease With Multi-Slice Computed Tomography Combined With Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Coronary Angiography Combined With Fractional Flow Reserve Trial

The purpose of the study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a combined use of non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with obstructive lesions on MSCT and with low to intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) as compared to invasive coronary angiography (CAG) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) measurements.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 RB
        • University Medical Center Groningen, Departments of Cardiology and Radiology
      • Linköping, Sweden
        • University Hospital Linköping, Departments of Clinical Physiology, Cardiology and Center for Medial Imaging Visualization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with stable angina pectoris with low to intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD;
  2. no previous history of CAD;
  3. obstructive stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) on MSCT coronary angiography; 4.informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with a previous history of CAD;
  2. patients with contraindications for MSCT: a.cardiac rhythms other than sinus rhythm, b.pregnancy, c.allergy for contrast medium, d.renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50ml/min), e.resting heart rate >75 bpm plus contra-indications for beta-blockade, f. weight >100 kilograms;
  3. contraindications for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging: a.MR-incompatible implants, b. Claustrophobia, c. contraindications for adenosine: i. known or suspected hypersensitivity to adenosine, ii. known or suspected bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic disease, iii. 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV) block, iv. Sinus bradycardia (heart rate < 45 bpm), v. Systemic arterial hypotension (<90 mmHg). d. contraindications for gadolinium: i. renal failure (estimated eGFR <30 ml/min);
  4. no informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Imaging arm
There is one study arm only. The imaging modalities will be performed in all patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy to detect ischemia with stress CMR compared to FFR
Time Frame: one month
The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography in combination with stress CMR imaging as compared to invasive CAG and FFR measurement, as a standard of reference to detect obstructive and hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with low to intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD.
one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive value for treatment strategy of a non-invasive strategy with MSCT and stress CMR compared to an invasive strategy
Time Frame: one month
to evaluate whether MSCT coronary angiography in combination with stress CMR imaging may accurately predict treatment strategy (medical therapy versus revascularization therapy) as compared to CAG and FFR in patients with low to intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD.
one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gabija Pundziute, MD, PhD, University Medical Center Groningen, department of Cardiology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on adenosine stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Subscribe