Angio-IMR and Cardiac MR-derived MVO in STEMI Patients

March 12, 2025 updated by: Joo Myung Lee, Samsung Medical Center

Functional Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Microvascular Obstruction in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction has been known to be prevalent even after successful revascularization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is significant prognostic indicator in STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although current gold-standard method to assess microvascular damage or dysfunction in STEMI patients is CMR and assessment of MVO, previous study presented that index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in culprit vessel of STEMI patients showed significant association with the presence of MVO in CMR and the risk of cardiac death or heart failure admission. Nevertheless, the need for pressure-temperature sensor wire and hyperemic agents significantly limits adoption of IMR in daily practice.

Recent technical development enabled angiographic derivation of IMR without pressure wire, hyperemic agents, or thermodilution method. In this regard, the current study will evaluate the feasibility of functional angiography-derived IMR (angio-IMR) in the evaluation of MVO after successful primary PCI for STEMI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction has been known to be prevalent even after successful revascularization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is significant prognostic indicator in STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although current gold-standard method to assess microvascular damage or dysfunction in STEMI patients is CMR and assessment of MVO, previous study presented that index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in culprit vessel of STEMI patients showed significant association with the presence of MVO in CMR and the risk of cardiac death or heart failure admission. Nevertheless, the need for pressure-temperature sensor wire and hyperemic agents significantly limits adoption of IMR in daily practice.

Recent technical development enabled angiographic derivation of IMR without pressure wire, hyperemic agents, or thermodilution method. In this regard, the current study will evaluate the feasibility of functional angiography-derived IMR (angio-IMR) in the evaluation of MVO after successful primary PCI for STEMI.

The study population will be derived from the prospective institutional AMI registry of Samsung Medical Center between December 2007 and July 2014. Main results from this registry were published elsewhere (PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0170115 and Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 4;9(1):9646). In this registry, 515 consecutive patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction and underwent CMR were prospectively enrolled. AMI was defined as evidence of myocardial injury (defined as elevation of cardiac troponin values, with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit) with necrosis in a clinical setting, consistent with myocardial ischemia. Among the total patients, STEMI patients (n = 332), whose electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation more than 1 mm in two or more contiguous leads or a presumably new-onset left bundle branch block, will be analyzed for the current study. For the study purpose, patients with failed primary PCI (n=1), treated by medical treatment alone without PCI (n=4), and no available coronary angiographic images (n=3) will be excluded. Among the remaining 324 patients, functional coronary angiography core laboratory (Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai, China) evaluated the quality of angiographic images and additionally exclude patients with insufficient image quality for angio-IMR calculation (n=37). All patients also underwent baseline and 1-year follow-up echocardiography. The Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center approved this study, and all patients provided written informed consent.

The association of Angio-IMR with CMR-derived quantitative parameters (extent of MVO, infarct size, area at risk) and qualitative parameter (presence of MVO) will be analyzed. The discrimination ability of angio-IMR to predict the presence of MVO in CMR will be compared with conventional angiographic measures of culprit vessel reperfusion (TIMI flow grade, myocardial blush grade).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

324

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai, China
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
        • University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be derived from the prospective institutional AMI registry of Samsung Medical Center between December 2007 and July 2014. In this registry, 515 consecutive patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction and underwent CMR were prospectively enrolled. Among the total patients, STEMI patients (n = 332) will be analyzed for the current study. For the study purpose, patients with failed primary PCI (n=1), treated by medical treatment alone without PCI (n=4), and no available coronary angiographic images (n=3) will be excluded. Among the remaining 324 patients, patients with insufficient image quality for angio-IMR calculation will be additionally excluded (n=37).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • STEMI patients
  • Successful primary PCI in the culprit vessel
  • Underwent cardiac MR during index hospitalization
  • Suitable coronary angiographic images for angio-IMR analysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with failed primary PCI
  • treated by medical treatment alone without PCI
  • no available coronary angiographic images
  • insufficient image quality for angio-IMR calculation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with Angio-IMR>40 Unit
Patients with angio-IMR>40U in the culprit vessel after successful primary PCI.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 5.0 ± 5.8 days after the primary PCI. MVO, infarct size, and myocardial salvage index were quantitatively assessed in CMR.
Patients with Angio-IMR≤40 Unit
Patients with angio-IMR≤40U in the culprit vessel after successful primary PCI.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 5.0 ± 5.8 days after the primary PCI. MVO, infarct size, and myocardial salvage index were quantitatively assessed in CMR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of microvascular obstruction in CMR
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization
Proportion of microvascular obstruction in CMR
At the time of index hospitalization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of angio-IMR with the extent of microvascular obstruction in CMR
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the extent of microvascular obstruction (% of left ventricular mass) in CMR
At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the infarct size in CMR
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the infarct size (% of left ventricular mass) in CMR
At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the area at risk in CMR
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the area at risk (% of left ventricular mass) in CMR
At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the myocardial salvage index in CMR
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization
Correlation of angio-IMR with the myocardial salvage index in CMR
At the time of index hospitalization
Discrimination ability of angio-IMR to predict the occurrence of microvascular obstruction in CMR
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization
area under curve in ROC analysis of angio-IMR to predict the occurrence of microvascular obstruction in CMR
At the time of index hospitalization
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization and 1 year follow-up
Left ventricular ejection fraction in echocardiography
At the time of index hospitalization and 1 year follow-up
Regional wall motion score index
Time Frame: At the time of index hospitalization and 1 year follow-up
Regional wall motion score index in echocardiography
At the time of index hospitalization and 1 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 24, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be able to be shared upon reasonable request after discussion by steering committee members and principal investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

Clinical Trials on Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Subscribe