Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness by Elevation of PEEP in Patients With Septic Shock

April 4, 2013 updated by: Erika Wilkman, Helsinki University Central Hospital
The aim of the study is to evaluate whether fluid responsiveness of the critically ill patient can be assessed by analysing the PEEP-induced hemodynamic effects to systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, aortic blood flow, aortic time-velocity integral and left ventricular end diastolic area measured with transesophageal echocardiography (PEEP-test). The chances are compared to increase of CI after volume expansion (gold standard). In clinical practise, it would be especially relevant if PEEP-induced changes in arterial pressure variations could be used in evaluation of volume status and fluid responsiveness. However, as ECHO-derived variables are used in greater extent to guide the treatment with inappropriate evidence, the simultaneous registration of ECHO-derived hemodynamic measurements is essential in the study design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Finland
    • HUS
      • Helsinki, HUS, Finland, 00029
        • Intensive Care Unit 20, Meilahti Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:• Written informed consent by patient or relative

  • Time in ICU < 48 hours
  • Septic shock
  • Pulmonary artery catheter and radial arterial catheter
  • Age 18 - 75 years
  • Sinus rhythm
  • Need for norepinephrine over 0.1 ug/kg/min but otherwise hemodynamically stable i.e no need to change the dose over the last 15min period before the study
  • Mechanical ventilation with sedation
  • Pwcp <18 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to elevation of PEEP ( elevated intracranial pressure, pulmonary hypertension or other contraindication )
  • Contraindication to fluid challenge
  • Contraindication to TEE
  • Previous heart failure, heart valve stenosis of insufficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study arm, elevation of PEEP
Other: Volume expansion with gelofusine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemodynamic changes indicating fluid responsiveness assessed during elevation of PEEP. Change in mean arterial pressure or aortic velocity time integral.
Time Frame: Measurement of hemodynamic variables at timepoints 0, 10,20, 60 minutes
Measurement of hemodynamic variables using a pulmonary catheter and transesophageal echocardiography at baseline PEEP 10, during elevation of PEEP and after volume challenge at PEEP 10 cmH2O
Measurement of hemodynamic variables at timepoints 0, 10,20, 60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pulmonary function and oxygenation
Time Frame: 0,10,20,60 minutes, at PEEP 10, 20,10 cmH2O and after fluid expansion PEEP10 cmH2O
0,10,20,60 minutes, at PEEP 10, 20,10 cmH2O and after fluid expansion PEEP10 cmH2O

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
blood gas sample, for assessment of pH, base excess and blood lactate
Time Frame: 0, 60 min
0, 60 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erika Wilkman, M.D, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUS469/E6/05

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Volume expansion with gelofusine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Guinea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe