Efficacy and Safety Study of FID 119515A

May 31, 2018 updated by: Alcon Research

A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Efficacy and Safety Study of FID 119515A in Dry Eye

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of FID 119515A to Blink® Tears on the integrity of tear film in adults with a history of dry eye in both eyes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Subjects who met the enrollment criteria were randomized in a 2:1 manner to receive treatment with FID 119515A or Blink® Tears respectively for this 1-day, single-dose study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign Informed Consent.
  • Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 55 or greater in each eye as measured by an ETDRS chart (letters read method).
  • At least a 3 month documented history of dry eye in both eyes.
  • TBUT and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire score as specified in protocol.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Any evidence of ocular infection or inflammation within 30 days prior to Screening.
  • Any ocular surgery.
  • Ocular trauma requiring medical or pharmacological treatment within 1 year of Screening.
  • Current presence of punctal plugs (permanent or temporary) or previous permanent punctal closure by cautery/diathermy.
  • Use of topical ocular prescription or non-prescription medications within 30 days of Screening.
  • Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days prior to Screening.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FID 119515A
FID 119515A, 1 drop instilled in the study eye, single dose
topical ocular drops
Active Comparator: Blink
Blink® Tears, 1 drop instilled in the study eye, single dose
topical ocular drops

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) at 60 Minutes
Time Frame: Baseline, 60 minutes
Fluorescein dye was instilled in the eye to assess tear break-up time. After instillation of the fluorescein, the subject was instructed to blink 3 times, then stare and not blink. The investigator measured the time from the last blink until the first black (dry) spot appeared in the precorneal tear film. Tear break-up time was assessed prior to test article instillation (baseline) and at 60 minutes. Three consecutive measurements were taken per eye at each time point, with the average of the 3 scores being the value analyzed. An increase in total score equates to improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used.
Baseline, 60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under Curve (AUC) of TBUT From 0 to 60 Minutes
Time Frame: 0 to 60 minutes
Fluorescein dye was instilled in the eye to assess tear break-up time. After instillation of the fluorescein, the subject was instructed to blink 3 times, then stare and not blink. The investigator measured the time from the last blink until the first black (dry) spot appeared in the precorneal tear film. Tear break-up time was assessed prior to test article instillation (baseline) and at 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes. Three consecutive measurements were taken per eye at each time point, with the average of the 3 scores being the value analyzed. An increase in total score equates to improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used.
0 to 60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lisa Lindsey, PhD, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on FID 119515A

Subscribe