Pharmacodynamic Effects of Prasugrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

May 26, 2015 updated by: University of Florida

A head-to Head Comparison of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of Prasugrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Recently, two P2Y12 receptor inhibitors have been approved for clinical use: prasugrel and ticagrelor. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor have shown to be associated with more potent antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel and are associated with an improved net clinical benefit. However, to date there are limited head-to-head comparisons of these two new agents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel is the cornerstone of treatment for prevention of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are a considerable number of patients who continue to have recurrent ischemic events despite this treatment regimen. These observations underscore the need for more potent antiplatelet therapies. Recently, two P2Y12 receptor inhibitors have been approved for clinical use: prasugrel and ticagrelor. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor have shown to be associated with more potent antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel. These more favorable pharmacodynamic effects translate into reduced ischemic event rates, at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Overall, these drugs are associated with an improved net clinical benefit. These findings from large-scale clinical investigations have led to approval of prasugrel and ticagrelor. However, to date there are limited head-to-head comparisons of these two new agents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known coronary artery disease
  • On maintenance treatment with aspirin (81 mg per day) and clopidogrel (75 mg per day) for at least 1-month as per standard of care.
  • Age between 18 and 74 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of stroke, transient ischemic attack or intracranial bleeding.
  • Known allergies to aspirin, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or clopidogrel.
  • Weight <60kg
  • On treatment with oral anticoagulation (coumarin derivate, dabigatran).
  • Hemoglobin<10 gm/dL
  • Platelet count <80x106/mL
  • Active bleeding or hemodynamic instability.
  • Creatinine Clearance <30 mL/minute.
  • Baseline ALT >2.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) or high degree AV block without pacemaker protection.
  • Drugs interfering with 2C19 metabolism (to avoid interaction with clopidogrel): , fluconazole (Diflucan), ketoconazole (Nizoral), voriconazole (VFEND), etravirine (Intelence), felbamate (Felbatol), fluoxetine (Prozac, Serafem, Symbyax), fluvoxamine (Luvox), and ticlopidine (Ticlid).
  • Drugs interfering CYP3A4 metabolism (to avoid interaction with Ticagrelor): Ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, and telithromizycin.
  • Pregnant females*. *Women of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives) while participating in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Prasugrel
Prasugrel 60mg loading dose and 10 mg maintenance dose
Prasugrel 60mg loading dose and 10mg maintenance dose
Other Names:
  • Effient
Active Comparator: Ticagrelor
Ticagrelor 180mg loading dose and 90mg bid maintenance dose
Ticagrelor 180mg loading dose and 90mg bid maintenance dose
Other Names:
  • Brillinta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Platelet Reactivity by Vasodilator-stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP)
Time Frame: 1 week
The primary end-point of the study was the comparison in the platelet reactivity index (PRI%) determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) at 1 week between prasugrel and ticagrelor.
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Platelet Reactivity Measured by Vasodilator-stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP)
Time Frame: 2 hours
A secondary outcome was the comparison between groups of platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) at 2 hours after loading dose.
2 hours
Platelet Reactivity Measured by Vasodilator-stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP)
Time Frame: 24 hours
A secondary outcome was the comparison between groups of platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) at 24 hours after loading dose.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Prasugrel

3
Subscribe