Time Trends in Waiting Times of NSCLC Patients.

September 29, 2015 updated by: Maastricht Radiation Oncology

Time Trends in Diagnostic Delay and Waiting Times of Four Patient Cohorts, Diagnosed With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Treated With High Dose Radiotherapy.

A large group of non-small cell lung cancer patients is treated with radiotherapy. Delivery of very high radiation doses is needed to obtain local control, but due to the large tumor and nodal volume this is often impossible without causing unrepairable damage to the normal tissue of the mediastinum, spinal cord, esophagus and lung.

Although every tumor is different with respect to the speed with which it grows and spreads, it is obvious that time plays an important role in cancer therapy. Recently it was reported that disease progression or increase of tumor volume occurred during the time interval between diagnosis and treatment.(1, 2) This could lead to a less optimal radiation treatment and consequently have an impact on overall survival. Moreover, the increasing number of diagnostic procedures, aimed at obtaining more accurate information about the tumor extension and biology, as well as the use of more sophisticated but labor intense radiation techniques could prolong the time interval between clinical symptoms and the start of the treatment. However, the influence of new diagnostic procedures or the applied radiotherapy techniques on waiting times is not yet known. The investigators therefore want to investigate 1) time trends in the waiting time for NSCLC patients, 2) the correlation between waiting times and the use of more advanced diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and 3) the correlation between waiting times and overall survival.

The hypotheses of the study:

  1. The diagnostic delay for NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years.
  2. The preparation time for radiotherapy of NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years.
  3. Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse overall survival outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

A large group of non-small cell lung cancer patients is treated with radiotherapy. Delivery of very high radiation doses is needed to obtain local control, but due to the large tumor and nodal volume this is often impossible without causing unrepairable damage to the normal tissue of the mediastinum, spinal cord, esophagus and lung.

Although every tumor is different with respect to the speed with which it grows and spreads, it is obvious that time plays an important role in cancer therapy. Recently it was reported that disease progression or increase of tumor volume occurred during the time interval between diagnosis and treatment.(1, 2) This could lead to a less optimal radiation treatment and consequently have an impact on overall survival. Moreover, the increasing number of diagnostic procedures, aimed at obtaining more accurate information about the tumor extension and biology, as well as the use of more sophisticated but labor intense radiation techniques could prolong the time interval between clinical symptoms and the start of the treatment. However, the influence of new diagnostic procedures or the applied radiotherapy techniques on waiting times is not yet known. The investigators therefore want to investigate 1) time trends in the waiting time for NSCLC patients, 2) the correlation between waiting times and the use of more advanced diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and 3) the correlation between waiting times and overall survival.

The hypotheses of the study:

  1. The diagnostic delay for NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years.
  2. The preparation time for radiotherapy of NSCLC patients has increased during the last 12 years.
  3. Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse overall survival outcome.

The IKL collected data on waiting times and treatment of NSCLC patients treated in 2001 and 2004. These data will be used for this project. In addition, the MAASTRO lung database contains information of patients treated in 2006 and 2010. Additional information about the diagnostic procedure and radiation treatment preparation will be collected by reviewing the patient charts. For this study a data request has to be submitted to the IKL and access to MAASTRO patient data (charts and EMD) is needed.

The investigators aim to collect the following variables: Date of consultation pulmonologist; Date of multidisciplinary meeting; Date of first consultancy at radiotherapy; Date of start radiotherapy; Information about diagnostic procedure (PET/CT/Pathology/EBUS/EUS); Information about RT procedure (3Dconventional/IMRT); General patient characteristics; Overall survival

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 ET
        • Maastro clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Four cohorts of NSCLC patients will be analyzed. Patients were all treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. To investigate the time trends, cohorts referred for radiotherapy treatment in 2001, 2004, 2006 and 2010 will be analyzed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with NSCLC treated in the Dutch province Limburg from 2001 onwards.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Radiotherapy in 2001
Radiotherapy in 2004
Radiotherapy in 2006
Radiotherapy in 2010

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analysis of waiting times
Time Frame: From intake to start of radiotherapy
Retrospective analysis of the time passed between consultation and start of radiotherapy (an expected average time frame of two weeks).
From intake to start of radiotherapy
Correlation of waiting times and treatment outcome
Time Frame: From treatment until date of censoring (12 years)
Is there a correlation between the time passed between consultation and start of radiotherapy and treatment outcome? (Time frame: 12 years)
From treatment until date of censoring (12 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

3
Subscribe