Complementary Neurosteroid Intervention in Gulf War Illnesses (GWVI)

April 30, 2020 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

This study will investigate the use of adjunctive pregnenolone for the following:

  1. fatigue that has limited usual activity,
  2. musculoskeletal pain involving 2 or more regions of the body and,
  3. cognitive symptoms (memory, concentration, or attentional difficulties by self-report) in Veterans deployed to the Gulf War theatre of operations between 1990 and 1991.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans deployed to the Gulf War theatre of operations between 1990 and 1991.
  • Veterans who report at least 2 of the following 3 symptoms that began in 1990 or thereafter, that lasted for more than 6 months, and that are present at the time of screening: 1) fatigue that limited usual activity, 2) musculoskeletal pain involving 2 or more regions of the body, 3) cognitive symptoms (memory, concentration, or attentional difficulties by self-report)
  • Stable on medication regimen (no change in last 4 weeks) and no anticipated change in medication during study.
  • Able to provide informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a history of clinically significant neurological, metabolic, hepatic, renal, hematological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and/or urological disorders (e.g. unstable angina, seizures, cerebrovascular accident, decompensated congestive heart failure, central nervous system (CNS) infection, cancer [other than non-melanoma skin cancer], or history of HIV seropositivity), which would pose a risk to the patient if s/he were to participate in the study or that might confound the results of the study.
  • Concurrent enrollment in another clinical trial.
  • Pregnant women or women of child-bearing potential who are not surgically-sterile or not using appropriate methods of birth control.
  • Use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal supplementation such as estrogen [although early studies suggested no effects on menstrual cycle, alterations in downstream metabolites or pregnenolone (such as estradiol) could theoretically impact the efficacy or oral contraceptives and/or estrogen replacement]. Similarly, it is theoretically possible that pregnenolone could be metabolized to other steroids such a DHEA, potentially resulting in hair, skin, or other steroid-related changes. Since the investigators' have determined in their prior study that pregnenolone administration does not result in downstream elevations in DHEA, DHEAS, estradiol, or testosterone, these possibilities may be unlikely.
  • Women who are breast-feeding.
  • Use of narcotic interventions.
  • Known allergy to study medication.
  • History of moderate or severe TBI (with loss of consciousness greater than 30 minutes)
  • A clearly defined disease entity that accounts for the Veteran's symptoms.
  • Current DSM-IV/DSM-IVTR/DSM-V diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, or dementia.
  • Subjects with a DSM-IV/DSM-IVTR/DSM-V diagnosis of alcohol or substance dependence (other than nicotine or caffeine) within the last month.
  • Subjects with a current suicidal or homicidal ideation necessitating clinical intervention or representing an imminent concern.
  • If in the judgment of the PI it is not in the subject's best interest to participate.
  • Final eligibility decisions will be determined by the PI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pregnenolone (Arm 1)
Pregnenolone
Pregnenolone 50mg BID x 14 days, followed by Pregnenolone 150 x 14 days, followed by Pregnenolone 250 mg BID x 28 days
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (Arm 2)
Placebo
Placebo 50mg BID x 14 days, followed by Placebo 150 x 14 days, followed by Placebo 250 mg BID x 28 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Component of the SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
These data report changes in the mean scores in physical health symptoms at Week 8 Post-Randomization and Week 4 Post-Randomization, relative to Baseline. The SF-36 is a health survey with an 8-scale profile embedded in 36 questions that measures physical and mental components of health. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range, with the lowest and highest possible scores set at 0 and 100, respectively. All of these items are scored such that a high score defines a more favorable health state, and the Physical Component Score is an average of 4 of the 8 domains of the SF-36. Thus, positive changes in scores represent an improvement relative to baseline.
Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
These data report changes in the mean scores in pain symptoms at Week 8 Post-Randomization and Week 4 Post-Randomization, relative to Baseline. The Brief Pain Inventory is a 14-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity, frequency and daily pattern of pain, as well as its perceived interference with quality of life. Severity is measured on a 0-10 scale with 10 being the greatest pain. Interference score is measured by a mean score of 7 items (0-10 scale) with 10 being the greatest interference. Thus, negative changes in scores represent an improvement relative to baseline.
Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
Tower of London Test of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders (BAC-A)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
These data report changes in the mean scores in cognitive symptoms at Week 8 Post-Randomization and Week 4 Post-Randomization, relative to Baseline. The Tower of London test assesses executive functioning on a scale of 0-20. (Note, if a perfect score of 20 occurs then there is the opportunity of 2 additional points, increasing the score to 22.) The higher the number, the higher the degree of executive functioning. Thus, positive changes in scores represent an improvement relative to baseline.
Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
These data report changes in the mean scores in fatigue symptoms at Week 8 Post-Randomization and Week 4 Post-Randomization, relative to Baseline. The MFI is a 20-item self-report measure designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue. Items are rated on a 1-5 scale indicating how true each statement was for the respondent during the last week, with some questions scored in an inverse fashion in the final calculation of the score. The 20 items are then summed, with higher scores representing greater fatigue. Thus, negative changes in scores represent an improvement relative to baseline.
Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
Global Severity Index of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90R)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8
These data report changes in the mean scores in psychiatric symptoms at Week 8 Post-Randomization and Week 4 Post-Randomization, relative to Baseline. The SCL-90R is used as a screening measure of general psychiatric symptomatology. It includes dimensions measuring somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety, hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Global Severity Index (GSI) of the SCL-90R is designed to measure overall psychological distress. Higher scores reflect greater distress. This is a 90 item measure with each rated on a scale of 0-4, with 4 being the highest level of psychological distress for each item. Thus, negative changes in scores represent an improvement relative to baseline.
Baseline to week 4, and Baseline to week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine E. Marx, MD MA, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Pregnenolone

Subscribe