Direct and Reversed Dorsal Digital Island Flaps: A Review of 65 Cases

March 28, 2014 updated by: The Second Hospital of Tangshan
Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the fingers continues to be a challenge problem. The study reports reconstruction of small to moderate defects of the fingers with the direct and reversed dorsal digital island flaps and evaluates the results of the use of the flaps.The main outcomes are static 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament scores of the flap and joint motion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At final follow-up, sensory restoration of the flap is measured using the static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test. Active motion of the joints is measured using a standard hand goniometer. For the direct DDIF, total active motion is calculated as the sum of degrees of active flexion of the interphalangeal and the metacarpophalangeal joints subtracted from the degrees of extension deficit. For the reversed DDIF, total active motion of the donor finger is calculated as the sum of degrees of active flexion of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints subtracted from the degrees of extension deficit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hebei
      • Tangshan, Hebei, China, 063000
        • The Second Hospital of Tangshan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a defect greater than or equal to 1.5 cm in length
  • the defects on the dorsal and lateral aspects of the fingers
  • the defects located between the distal 1/2 of the middle phalanx and the tip of the finger
  • a patient between 15 and 60 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • injuries involving the donor sites or the course of the vascular pedicle
  • a defect less than 1.5 cm in length.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Dorsal digital island flap
The flap is used to cover the soft-tissue defects of the fingers.
The direct dorsal digital island flap is used to cover the defects of adjacent fingers. The reversed dorsal digital island flap is used to cover the defects of the same fingers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static 2-point discrimination test
Time Frame: 16 to 24 months
The test points are at the center of the flap. Each area is tested 3 times with a Discriminator (Ali Med, Dedham, MA). We stop at 4mm as a limit of static 2-point discrimination test and consider this normal.
16 to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total active motion
Time Frame: 16-24 months
Active motion of the joints is measured using a standard hand goniometer. For the direct DDIF, total active motion is calculated as the sum of degrees of active flexion of the interphalangeal and the metacarpophalangeal joints subtracted from the degrees of extension deficit. For the reversed DDIF, TAM of the donor finger is calculated as the sum of degrees of active flexion of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints subtracted from the degrees of extension deficit.
16-24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sensory Restoration

Clinical Trials on Direct and reversed dorsal digital island flap

Subscribe