The Dorsal Homodigital Island Flap Based on the Dorsal Branch of the Digital Artery: A Review of 171 Cases

June 5, 2013 updated by: The Second Hospital of Tangshan
Soft tissue reconstruction in the finger continues to evolve. The dorsum of the finger is a reliable flap donor site in reconstructive hand surgery because of its similar quality to the original. The dorsal homodigital island flap can be used as a reliable alternative for reconstructing small to moderate defects of the fingers. In this retrospective study, the investigators would evaluate the efficacy of the technique for tissue reconstruction in different regions of the finger, with an emphasis on sensibility, pain and donor site morbidity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At final follow-up, sensory restoration of the flap is measured using the static 2-point discrimination test and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test. We evaluate pain sensations of the reconstructed fingers and donor sites with a visual analog scale. The system consist of a 10 cm line that is grouped into mild (0-3 cm), moderate (4-6 cm) and severe (7-10 cm). Active motion of the joints is measured using a goniometer. The motion arcs of the reconstructed fingers are compared with the opposite side.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

173

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hebei
      • Tangshan, Hebei, China, 063000
        • The Second Hospital of Tangshan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the soft tissue defect in one finger or in multiple fingers
  • a defect > 1.5 cm and < 3 cm in length
  • necessity to preserve finger length
  • a patient between 15 and 60 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • injuries to the dorsum of the finger or to the course of the vascular pedicle that precluded its use as the donor
  • a defect≤1.5 cm or ≥3 cm in length
  • a soft tissue defect of the thumb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Surgical flap
The dorsal homodigital island flap is a perforator type flap based on the DB, which uses the dorsal skin of the injured finger to provide soft tissue coverage for a volar defect.
The dorsal homodigital island flap is used for tissue reconstruction in different regions of the finger.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static 2-point discrimination test
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
The test point is at the center of the flap. Each area was tested 3 times with a Discriminator (Ali Med, Dedham, MA). We stop at 4mm as a limit of 2PD and considered this normal.
18 months to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cold intolerance
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
We access the cold intolerance of the injured and donor fingers using the self-administered Cold Intolerance Severity Score questionnaire10 that is rated into mild, moderate, severe, and extreme (0-25, 26-50, 51-75 and 76-100).
18 months to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Defect

Clinical Trials on The dorsal homodigital island flap

3
Subscribe