- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02210338
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
April 27, 2016 updated by: Singapore General Hospital
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With a Simulated Difficult Airway
The study aims to determine the better device to facilitate intubation in patients with a limited neck movement and small mouth opening.
This may help anesthesiology as well as emergency medicine practitioners and departments to decide when choosing between these two conceptually similar device.
The hypothesis to be tested is that the C-MAC® is more superior when compared to the Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope in success of intubation, time to intubation and complication rate in patients with a fixed cervical collar.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
64
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 169608
- Recruiting
- Singapore General Hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- Theodore GL Wong
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Hairil R Abdullah
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Diana XH Chan
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christine YK Yong
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia who require endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with history of previous difficult endotracheal intubation
- Patients with two or more predictors of difficult mask ventilation or difficult intubation or the combination of both
- Patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grading of III and above are excluded from the study, as well as patients with 2 or more predictors for difficult mask ventilation or difficult intubation or the combination of both.
- Patients needing a rapid sequence induction for rapid securement of the airway
- Pregnant women
- Patients below the age of 21 years old
- Patients unfit to give consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Karl Storz C-MAC
Intubation of patient using the Karl Storz C-MAC video laryngoscope
|
|
|
Experimental: Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
Intubation of patient using Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success of intubation on first attempt
Time Frame: up to 10min - from time of induction to appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph after first attempt at intubation
|
A rigid cervical collar will to each patient to stimulate a difficult airway and standard induction of general anaesthesia will be carried out.
Adequate muscle relaxation will be confirmed by the use of a standard neuromuscular Train-of-Four monitor, showing no twitch.
Intubation will then proceed with the assigned airway device.
A successful outcome at intubation will involve being able to pass an appropriately sized endotracheal tube pass the vocal cords into the trachea on the first try, as evidenced by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide on a capnograph.
|
up to 10min - from time of induction to appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph after first attempt at intubation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time taken to successful intubation
Time Frame: up to 10min - from time of induction to appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph after successful intubation
|
A rigid cervical collar will to each patient to stimulate a difficult airway and standard induction of general anaesthesia will be carried out.
Adequate muscle relaxation will be confirmed by the use of a standard neuromuscular Train-of-Four monitor, showing no twitch.
Time to successful intubation will then be measured from the first handling of the airway device, until successful intubation with an endotracheal tube is confirmed by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide on a capnograph trace.
|
up to 10min - from time of induction to appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph after successful intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Theodore GL Wong, Singapore General Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2016
Study Completion (Anticipated)
March 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 5, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
August 6, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 28, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 27, 2016
Last Verified
April 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- sghan-cb01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.