Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Fixed-Dose Combination on Cerebral Metabolism and Neurocognition in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Participants With Chronic Genotype 1 HCV Infection

October 19, 2018 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 2, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study to Investigate the Effect of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Fixed-Dose Combination on Cerebral Metabolism and Neurocognition in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Chronic Genotype 1 HCV Infection

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of sustained virologic response (SVR) on cerebral metabolism as determined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and on neurocognition as measured by neurocognitive tests. This study will also evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) for 12 weeks in treatment-naive or treatment-experienced adults.

During the blinded treatment phase, participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive LDV/SOF FDC or placebo for 12 weeks. After the unblinding at the Posttreatment Week 4 visit, participants in the placebo group will be offered open-label treatment of LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months) documented by prior medical history or liver biopsy
  • Chronic genotype 1 HCV infection
  • Screening laboratory values within defined thresholds
  • Use of protocol-specified method(s) of contraception if female of childbearing potential or sexually active male

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically-significant illness (other than HCV) or any other major medical disorder that may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. Current or prior history of any of the following:

    • Hepatic decompensation
    • Solid organ transplantation
    • Significant pulmonary or cardiac disease
    • Chronic liver disease of a non-HCV etiology
    • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
    • Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV)
    • Infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
    • History of recent epilepsy (within 2 years of screening) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA)
    • Structural brain damage
  • Presence of cirrhosis
  • Contraindication to MRI
  • Pregnant or nursing female
  • Prior treatment NS5A directly-acting antiviral agent. Any interferon (IFN)-containing regimen within 8 weeks of Screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LDV/SOF
Participants will receive LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks.
90/400 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
  • Harvoni®
  • GS-5885/GS-7977
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive LDV/SOF placebo for 12 weeks.
Tablet administered orally once daily
Experimental: Open-Label Treatment Phase
Following Posttreatment Week 4, participants in the placebo group will be offered open-label treatment with LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks.
90/400 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
  • Harvoni®
  • GS-5885/GS-7977

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: NAA + NAAG
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal N-acetylaspartate (NAA) + N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in MRS Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Choline
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal choline was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in MRS Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Myoinositol
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal myoinositol was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Memory T Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Memory T Score: visuospatial memory immediate total T score (BVMTTTs), visuospatial memory delayed T score (BVMTTDTS), verbal memory total T score (HVLTTTS), and verbal memory delayed T score (HVLTDTS).

For this analysis, Memory T Score (total) ranged from 80 to 320, with higher scores indicating better memory.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Attention Scaled Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Attention Scaled Score: forward digit span scaled score (FSCORESS), backward digit span scaled score (BSCORESS), and symbol span total scaled score (SYMSPSS).

For this analysis, Attention Scaled Score (total) ranged from 3 to 57, with higher scores indicating better working memory capacity and control.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 1 Processing Speed
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 1 Processing Speed score: symbol search total scaled score (SSSS) and trails A total raw score (TrailARS).

For this analysis, Executive 1 Processing Speed score (total) ranged from 1 to 108, with lower scores indicating better executive control.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score: trails B raw score (TrailBRS), age & education adjusted raw score (FASadj), color word interference score (time) (CWTrial3), and color word interference/shifting score (time) (CWTrial4).

For this analysis, Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score (total) ranged from 1 to 570, with lower scores indicating better executive control.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Motor
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Motor score: dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (DomHtot) and non-dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (nonDOMHtot).

For this analysis, Motor score (total) ranged from 20 to 600, with lower scores indicating better fine motor speed.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at 4, 12, and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR4, SVR12, and SVR24)
Time Frame: Posttreatment Weeks 4, 12, and 24
SVR4, SVR12, and SVR24 were defined as HCV RNA < the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; ie, 15 IU/mL) at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after stopping study treatment with LDV/SOF, respectively.
Posttreatment Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Memory T Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Memory T Score: visuospatial memory immediate total T score (BVMTTTs), visuospatial memory delayed T score (BVMTTDTS), verbal memory total T score (HVLTTTS), and verbal memory delayed T score (HVLTDTS).

For this analysis, Memory T Score (total) ranged from 80 to 320, with higher scores indicating better memory.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Attention Scaled Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Attention Scaled Score: forward digit span scaled score (FSCORESS), backward digit span scaled score (BSCORESS), and symbol span total scaled score (SYMSPSS).

For this analysis, Attention Scaled Score (total) ranged from 3 to 57, with higher scores indicating better working memory capacity and control.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 1 Processing Speed
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 1 Processing Speed score: symbol search total scaled score (SSSS) and trails A total raw score (TrailARS).

For this analysis, Executive 1 Processing Speed score (total) ranged from 1 to 108, with lower scores indicating better executive control.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score: trails B raw score (TrailBRS), age & education adjusted raw score (FASadj), color word interference score (time) (CWTrial3), and color word interference/shifting score (time) (CWTrial4).

For this analysis, Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score (total) ranged from 1 to 570, with lower scores indicating better executive control.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Motor
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24

Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Motor score: dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (DomHtot) and non-dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (nonDOMHtot).

For this analysis, Motor score (total) ranged from 20 to 600, with lower scores indicating better fine motor speed.

Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Scale - Physical Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
The SF-36 Health Survey is a self-reporting, multi-item scale measuring 8 health concepts: 1) physical functioning, 2) role limitations due to physical health problems, 3) bodily pain, 4) general health, 5) vitality (energy/fatigue), 6) social functioning, 7) role limitations due to emotional problems and 8) mental health (psychological distress and psychological well-being). The first 6 concepts constitute the physical component summary. The total score is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 with lower scores representing more disability and higher scores representing less disability.
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by SF-36 Health Survey Scale - Mental Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment (PT) Weeks 4 and 24
The SF-36 Health Survey is a self-reporting, multi-item scale measuring 8 health concepts: 1) physical functioning, 2) role limitations due to physical health problems, 3) bodily pain, 4) general health, 5) vitality (energy/fatigue), 6) social functioning, 7) role limitations due to emotional problems and 8) mental health (psychological distress and psychological well-being). The last 5 concepts constitute the mental component summary. The total score is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 with lower score representing more disability and higher scores representing less disability.
Baseline; Posttreatment (PT) Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire - HCV (CLDQ-HCV)
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. CLDQ-HCV scores are calculated using participant responses to 29 questions divided into 4 domains: Activity/Energy, Emotion, Worry, and Systemic. An overall CLDQ-HCV score is calculated by taking the mean of all domain scores. Overall CLDQ-HCV scores range between 1 and 7, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
The FACIT-Fatigue score was measured using a 40-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The FACIT-F total score was calculated by taking the sum of all 40 individual scores and ranged from 0-160, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, Hepatitis C (WPAI: Hepatitis C) - Overall Work Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Impairment in overall work productivity was measured using the WPAI: Hepatitis C questionnaire completed by participants during study visits throughout the study. This questionnaire measured the effect of hepatitis C on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Overall work impairment is expressed as a percentage and ranges from 0% (no effect) to 100% (completely prevented from working).
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by WPAI: Hepatitis C - Activity Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Activity impairment was measured using the WPAI: Hepatitis C questionnaire completed by participants during study visits throughout the study. This questionnaire measured the effect of hepatitis C on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Overall activity impairment is expressed as a percentage and ranges from 0% (no effect) to 100% (completely prevented from performing regular activities).
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Pre-treatment Assessment in Mood Related Assessment at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report instrument for measuring the severity of depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The item scores are summed to yield a derived total score that can range from 0 to 63 with lower values indicating less depression.
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Pre-treatment Assessment in Mood Related Assessment at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
Time Frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
The BHS is a 20-item scale for measuring the extent of negative attitudes about the future (pessimism) as perceived by adolescents and adults. The BHS consists of 20 true-false statements. Each of the 20 statements is scored 1 or 0. Of the 20 true-false statements, 9 are keyed FALSE, and 11 are keyed TRUE to indicate endorsement of pessimism about the future. The item scores are summed to yield a total score that can range from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater hopelessness.
Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Benedetta Massetto, MD, Gilead Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at http://www.gilead.com/research/disclosure-and-transparency.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

18 months after study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A secured external environment with username, password, and RSA code.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Clinical Trials on LDV/SOF

3
Subscribe