An International Randomized Study to Compare SPIES Versus WLI

The SPIES Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Study - A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study; A Multicenter International Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Outcome Using the Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (SPIES) Versus White Light Imaging (WLI) During TURB of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC).

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which the efficacy between SPIES assisted and WLI assisted TURB are compared. Subjects in the experimental arm (Arm A) will undergo SPIES assisted TURB, whereas subjects in the control arm (Arm B) will receive treatment with WLI assisted TURB only. Baseline characteristics will be recorded, as well as short and long-term follow up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which the recurrence rates of cancer between SPIES assisted and WLI assisted TURB are compared. Randomization is stratified by tumor multiplicity (single or multiple), tumor status (primary or recurrent) and macroscopic findings (papillary or flat, where CIS is scored as flat lesion). Patients randomized into the experimental arm (Arm A) will undergo SPIES and WLI assisted TURB, whereas the patients in the control arm (Arm B) will undergo WLI only assisted TURB. WLI is chosen as control, since it is considered the gold standard for detecting bladder tumors. Short and long term follow up will be recorded in order to evaluate the health gains for patients over a longer period. Perioperative (30 days) complications will be compared between the two treatment arms to evaluate the safety of SPIES.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has signed informed consent
  • Is scheduled for treatment of a primary or recurrent NMIBC
  • Is aged 18 years or older
  • Has or has had no tumors in the upper urinary tract
  • Has had no previous irradiation of the pelvis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gross haematuria at the time of TURB (i.e. heavy bladder bleeding resulting in marked amounts of blood in the urine which may interfere with cystoscopy)
  • Participation in other clinical studies with investigational drugs either concurrently or within the last 30 days
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding (all women of child-bearing potential must document a negative serum or urine pregnancy test at screening and are suggested to use the contraceptive pill or an intrauterine device (IUD) during the treatments and for at least one months thereafter)
  • Conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance
  • Has had instillation therapy in the six months prior to the screening visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
SPIES+WLI assisted TURB
Active Comparator: B
WLI assisted TURB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the recurrence rate of tumor at 12 months following SPIES assisted TURB (Arm A) with White Light Imaging only assisted TURB (Arm B)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
1. To assess the recurrence rate of tumor at short and long term follow up (3 months and 3 years) after SPIES or WLI assisted TURB in patients with NMIBC.
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
2. To assess the peri-operative morbidity (30 days) between SPIES and WLI assisted TURB by comparing the proportion of adverse events and using the Clavien-Dindo score.
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jean de la Rosette, Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on SPIES+WLI assisted TURB

Subscribe