Urinary Diversion During Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer

November 8, 2016 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion During Robotic Radical Cystectomy

This randomized clinical trial studies intracorporeal or extracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic assisted radical cystectomy in reducing complications in patients with bladder cancer. Radical cystectomy is surgery to remove the entire bladder as well as nearby tissues and organs. After the bladder is removed, urinary diversion (a surgical procedure to make a new way for urine to leave the body) is performed. It is not yet known whether intracorporeal (within the body) or extracorporeal (outside of the body) urinary diversion is a better method in patients with bladder cancer undergoing robotic assisted radical cystectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare perioperative outcomes and complications after robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (IUD) and RARC with extracorporeal urinary diversion (EUD) in a prospective randomized fashion.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Time to passage of flatus. II. Analgesic requirement (narcotic use). III. Hospital length of stay. IV. Total operating time. V. Estimated blood loss. VI. Readmission rate. VII. Bladder Cancer Index Questionnaire. VIII. Ureteral strictures. IX. Stomal stenosis. X. Disease recurrence. XI. Secondary procedures.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo RARC with IUD.

ARM II: Patients undergo RARC with EUD.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up within 90 days and then for 2-5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Grade G1 - G3 bladder cancer
  • T stage: cTis - T2
  • N0
  • M0
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) < 4
  • Informed consent
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 or better
  • Hemoglobin (Hgb) > 8.0 g/dL
  • White blood cell (WBC) > 2.0 k/uL
  • Platelets > 50,000
  • Creatinine < 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 5.0 x ULN
  • Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 5.0 x ULN

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unsuitable for or refusing radical cystectomy
  • T stage ≥ T3 (mass extending outside the bladder)
  • Gross nodal or metastatic disease at presentation (≥ N1, M1)
  • Prior pelvic radiation
  • Prior open or laparoscopic/robotic bladder or prostate surgery
  • Prior colorectal surgery or history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40
  • ECOG performance status 3 or worse
  • History of coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Chronic steroid use
  • Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and/or on dialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (RARC with IUD)
Patients undergo RARC with IUD.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • quality of life assessment
Undergo RARC with IUD
Undergo RARC with EUD
Undergo RARC with IUD
Undergo RARC with EUD
Experimental: Arm II (RARC with EUD)
Patients undergo RARC with EUD.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • quality of life assessment
Undergo RARC with IUD
Undergo RARC with EUD
Undergo RARC with IUD
Undergo RARC with EUD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication rate
Time Frame: 90 days after surgery
Analyzed using multivariable logistical regression. Descriptions and grading scales found in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for adverse event reporting.
90 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to passage of flatus
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Analyzed using regression analysis.
Up to 90 days
Analgesic requirement (narcotic use)
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Analyzed using logistical regression.
Up to 90 days
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Analyzed using regression analysis.
Up to 90 days
Total operating time
Time Frame: Up to completion of surgery
Analyzed using regression analysis.
Up to completion of surgery
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Analyzed using regression analysis.
Up to 90 days
Readmission rate
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Analyzed using regression analysis.
Up to 90 days
Quality of life assessed using the Bladder Cancer Index Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The Cox proportional hazards model will be used. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) associated with the use of RARC with IUD compared with the use of RARC with EUD will be calculated.
Up to 5 years
Ureteral strictures
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The Cox proportional hazards model will be used. The HR and 95% CI associated with the use of RARC with IUD compared with the use of RARC with EUD will be calculated.
Up to 5 years
Stromal stenosis
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The Cox proportional hazards model will be used. The HR and 95% CI associated with the use of RARC with IUD compared with the use of RARC with EUD will be calculated.
Up to 5 years
Disease recurrence
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The Cox proportional hazards model will be used. The HR and 95% CI associated with the use of RARC with IUD compared with the use of RARC with EUD will be calculated.
Up to 5 years
Secondary procedures
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The Cox proportional hazards model will be used. The HR and 95% CI associated with the use of RARC with IUD compared with the use of RARC with EUD will be calculated.
Up to 5 years
Cumulative complication incidence
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Graphically described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Descriptions and grading scales found in the NCI CTCAE version 4.0 will be utilized for adverse event reporting.
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CASE7814
  • P30CA043703 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2014-01530 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • CASE 7814 (Other Identifier: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on quality-of-life assessment

3
Subscribe