MyndMove Therapy for Severe Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke

January 27, 2020 updated by: MyndTec Inc.

Clinical Feasibility and Usability of MyndMove Therapy for FES Facilitated Treatment of Subacute and Chronic Severe Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of MyndMove therapy in the early sub-acute, late sub-acute and chronic post-stroke patients. Other objectives include assessing the required doses of electrical current amplitudes, the usability of the device, and examining the overall safety.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of MyndMove therapy in the early sub-acute, late sub-acute and chronic post-stroke patients. Other objectives include assessing the required doses of electrical current amplitudes, the usability of the device, and examining the overall safety.

Many individuals experience weakness or paralysis of their arms and hands following a stroke. As a result, they are often unable to grasp and reach objects voluntarily and have difficulty performing basic activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing, feeding, bathing and grooming. Despite extensive rehabilitation programs, many of these individuals remain dependent on others for assistance with ADLs. This unmet medical need remains the focus of a wide range of research efforts.

MyndMove is a newly developed Functional Electrical Stimulation based treatment designed to recover voluntary movement in severely paralyzed upper limbs following stroke and spinal cord injury.

This study will enroll stroke patients that have severe hemiparesis of an upper limb (as defined by 1) an UE-FMA score of less than or equal to 19 and 2) a Chedoke McMaster Stage of 1-2 for the arm and hand). Three cohorts of patients enrolled in the study will include:

  • Early sub-acute stroke patients (less than 2 months post stroke) receiving therapy during inpatient rehabilitation;
  • Late sub-acute stroke patients (post-discharge from inpatient rehab and less than 6 months post stroke) receiving therapy in outpatient clinic settings; and
  • Chronic stroke patients (greater than 6 months post stroke) receiving therapy in outpatient clinic settings

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Brampton, Ontario, Canada
      • London, Ontario, Canada
      • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      • Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by MRI or CT scan
  2. Sub-acute subjects at least 10 days post stroke. Chronic subjects at least 6 months post stroke
  3. Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Stage 1-2 (arm and hand)
  4. Severe hemiplegia of the upper extremity defined as UE-FMA score of less than or equal to 19
  5. Subject is able to follow instructions
  6. Subject is able to sit and participate in one hour of upper limb therapy
  7. Anticipated to be discharged home or already at home following conventional inpatient rehabilitation
  8. Willing to attend outpatient therapy if chronic or late sub-acute
  9. Subject is able and willing to give written informed consent
  10. Men and women aged 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Global Aphasia
  2. Previous history of clinical stroke either ischemic infarct, hemorrhagic and subarachnoid bleeding
  3. Upper extremity injury or condition prior to stroke that limits the function of the hand or arm
  4. Life expectancy of less than 12 months due to other illness
  5. Subject has malignant skin lesion on the affected upper extremity
  6. Subject has history of seizure disorder and on seizure medications
  7. Subject has existing electrical stimulation devices (ICD, Pacemaker, Spinal Stimulation)
  8. Neurologic condition that may affect motor response (e.g. Parkinson's, ALS, MS)
  9. Subject has rash or open wound at any potential electrode site
  10. In the judgment of the medical provider, subject has medical complications that may interfere with the execution of the study
  11. Botulinum toxin (Botox) injection into affected upper extremity at least 3 months before the study or during the study
  12. Currently enrolled in another upper limb study
  13. Enrolled in the past six months in a clinical study involving drugs or biologics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MyndMove
The MyndMove system is a neuromodulation device that delivers short electrical pulses to stimulate muscle contractions and enhance motor recovery following Stroke or Spinal Cord Injury. MyndMove delivers therapeutic stimulation sequences called protocols, which are coded therapeutic algorithms which assist muscle movement allowing the brain and central nervous system to be retrained restoring voluntary reaching and grasping functions lost following neurological injury. The MyndMove system comprises the hardware device, stimulation electrodes and cables, hand and foot switches, and integrated software.
During a MyndMove therapy session, the patient is instructed to attempt to execute a task voluntarily. As the patient is attempting to perform the designated task, specific muscles in the arm are stimulated to generate contractions that produce the desired movement. After a brief interval of the patient attempting to initiate a movement the therapist activates the MyndMove stimulation protocol, which generates bursts of short electrical pulses, using surface electrodes, to produce muscle contractions enabling the patient to complete the desired/instructed task. Proper sequencing of the muscle contractions as per the MyndMove protocols are tailored to achieve a wide range of reaching and grasping functions. The technique stimulates non-damaged pathways of the central nervous system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA) is a standardized scale used for the evaluation of physical performance in the post-stroke hemiplegic patient. The upper extremity (UE) evaluates the function of the upper extremity motor function in four components: Shoulder/Elbow and Forearm, Wrist, Hand and Coordination and Speed in a series of performed tasks. The maximum score associated with the UE-FMA is 66 points. Each of the 33 specific tasks is scored as either 0 or an absence of function to a maximum score of 2 for the tasks being fully completed. Partial function can be scored as 1 for selected tasks. This evaluation will be completed by a trained physiotherapist or occupational therapist. Upper extremity assessment for stroke patients. Clinically Significant change is >6 points
baseline to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Independence Measure and Self-Care Functional Independence Measure for the early subacute subjects
Time Frame: Baseline - 6 weeks
To measure the degree of disability the Functional Independence Measure will be completed. The FIM consists of 18 items of which 13 are motor related tasks and 5 are cognitive related items. The measure is broken down into 6 classifications of self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication and social cognition. The self-care consists of 6 items: eating, grooming, bathing, dressing-upper body, dressing-lower body, toileting. Each item is rated using a 7-point scale indicating the level of functioning from total assistance with a score of 1 to complete independence with a score of 7.
Baseline - 6 weeks
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: An average of 5 weeks after therapy has begun
Each Therapist will complete the System Usability Scale on the last treatment visit which is expected to be an average of 5 weeks after therapy has begun. Each question in the System Usability Scale is scored from 1 - Strongly Disagree, through to 5 - Strongly Agree. System Usability Scale scores, based on therapist assessments, at end of study compared to baseline (after basic training).
An average of 5 weeks after therapy has begun
All adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline - An average of 5 weeks after therapy has begun
At each study visit, participants will be asked if they have experienced any adverse events. Participants will be in the study for an expected average of 5 weeks.
Baseline - An average of 5 weeks after therapy has begun
Amplitudes to elicit muscle movement
Time Frame: Throughout study
The amplitudes that are used to elicit the muscle movement will be recorded for the various muscles for each participant. The average required amplitude will be calculated and the minimum and maximum amplitudes will be noted. This will provide future guidance on the typical range of amplitudes needed for the various muscles to treat patients.
Throughout study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Bayley, MD, University Health Network, Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Debbie A Hebert, MSc(Kin), University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke

Clinical Trials on MyndMove

3
Subscribe