- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06956677
Usability and Effectiveness of a Novel Bilateral Upper Limb Training Device for Stroke Patients With Hemiparesis: A Preliminary Study (Synslai)
Background and Study Aims Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, affecting millions of individuals each year. After experiencing a stroke, many patients face challenges with their upper limbs, resulting in difficulties in performing daily activities. This study aims to evaluate a new rehabilitation device designed to assist stroke patients with hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) in improving their upper limb function. The goal is to determine if this device can effectively support recovery while providing an affordable and accessible option for rehabilitation.
Who Can Participate? This study is open to adults aged between 18 and 70 years, regardless of sex. To participate, individuals must have a confirmed diagnosis of hemiplegic stroke, which means they must experience weakness in one side of the body. Participants should have had their stroke within the last 12 months and must be able to follow simple commands. Those with cognitive impairments, other neurological disorders, certain orthopedic conditions affecting the upper limb, or active skin issues will not be eligible.
What Does the Study Involve? Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to two groups: one group will use the new rehabilitation device, while the other will receive conventional occupational therapy. Both groups will undergo an assessment before and after the intervention to measure their improvement in upper limb function. The device encourages exercises that are essential for fostering movement recovery, while the conventional therapy focuses on traditional rehabilitation methods. Participants will have their upper limb function evaluated through established assessment tools to gauge progress.
What Are the Possible Benefits and Risks of Participating? By participating in this study, individuals may experience improvements in their upper limb function, leading to increased independence and enhanced quality of life. Additionally, participants will contribute to valuable research that could improve rehabilitation strategies for future stroke patients. While the rehabilitation device is designed to be safe, some individuals may experience mild discomfort or fatigue from the exercises. However, serious side effects are rare. Participants are encouraged to discuss any concerns with the research team.
Where Is the Study Run From? The study is being conducted at New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital in Taiwan, specifically in the rehabilitation ward, where trained medical professionals oversee the research process.
When Is the Study Starting and How Long Is It Expected to Run For? The study commenced in September 2023 and is expected to continue through November 2024. This timeline allows for recruiting participants and thorough data collection to assess the device's effectiveness.
Who Is Funding the Study? This study does not have external funding and is being conducted independently by the researchers involved. All costs associated with the study, including participant care and device usage, are covered by the resources of the conducting institution.
Who Is the Main Contact?
For more information about this study, please contact:
Kuo-Cheng, Liu Position: Research Coordinator Email address: monhh159@gmail.com
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
New Taipei City, Taiwan, 236
- New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed stroke diagnosis by imaging, with onset within the past 12 months
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- Stable physiological and neurological status (no neurological deterioration and stable vital signs for ≥72 hours; complications resolved or medically managed)
- Adequate cognitive function to follow at least two-step commands
- Willingness to provide written informed consent
- Unilateral upper extremity (UE) hemiplegia
- Brunnstrom stage > I for proximal UE motor function
- UE muscle tone < 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment
- Other neurological disorders
- Orthopedic conditions affecting the UE
- Active or non-healed dermatological lesions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Intervention includes 30 minutes of UE functional training and 1 hour of conventional occupational therapy.
|
The UE functional training focuses on the affected arm, incorporating exercises such as push-pull boxes (standing or seated), alternating push-pull boxes, and hand-crank exercises.
Conventional occupational therapy
|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Intervention consists of 30 minutes of novel UE rehabilitation device training and 1 hour of conventional occupational therapy.
|
Conventional occupational therapy
The novel UE rehabilitation device training includes the single-joint exercise and dual-joint exercise, each performed 20 repetitions per set, for a total of 5 sets with 30-second rest intervals between sets.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity
Time Frame: Outcome measurements were performed at three stages: before and after (immediately following the final session) the intervention.
|
This assessment captures motor recovery across four specific domains: Part A (proximal upper limb-shoulder, elbow, and forearm), Part B (wrist), Part C (hand), and Part D (coordination and speed).
The full scale ranges from 0 to 66 and the higher scores represent the better outcome.
|
Outcome measurements were performed at three stages: before and after (immediately following the final session) the intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brunnstrom stage
Time Frame: Outcome measurements were performed at three stages: before and after (immediately following the final session) the intervention.
|
The Brunnstrom scale classifies motor recovery post-stroke into six stages, ranging from flaccid paralysis (Stage I) to near-normal voluntary control (Stage VI), and the higher stage represent the better outcome.
|
Outcome measurements were performed at three stages: before and after (immediately following the final session) the intervention.
|
|
Modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: Outcome measurements were performed at three stages: before, during (after the 5th training session), and after (immediately following the final session) the intervention.
|
This scale assesses the severity of muscle spasticity by quantifying resistance to passive movement on a scale from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion or extension) and the higer scores represent the worse outcome.
|
Outcome measurements were performed at three stages: before, during (after the 5th training session), and after (immediately following the final session) the intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 3;9(9):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub5.
- Sahu RK, Gugnani A, Ahluwalia R. Short-term effectiveness of trunk and bimanual hand training on upper limb motor recovery and function in stroke patients. International journal of health sciences. 05/15 2022;6(S1):10058-10071. doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7384
- Julien M, Laffont I, Bonnin H-Y, Liesjet V, Mottet D. Bimanual Coordination Being Efficient Around Two Months After Stroke: A Key Recovery Moment for Starting Bimanual Rehabilitation Protocols? BIO Web of Conferences. 12/01 2011;1doi:10.1051/bioconf/20110100062
- Metrot J, Mottet D, Hauret I, van Dokkum L, Bonnin-Koang HY, Torre K, Laffont I. Changes in bimanual coordination during the first 6 weeks after moderate hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(3):251-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968312461072. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
- Ma D, Li X, Xu Q, Yang F, Feng Y, Wang W, Huang JJ, Pei YC, Pan Y. Robot-Assisted Bimanual Training Improves Hand Function in Patients With Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 6;13:884261. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884261. eCollection 2022.
- Shahid J, Kashif A, Shahid MK. A Comprehensive Review of Physical Therapy Interventions for Stroke Rehabilitation: Impairment-Based Approaches and Functional Goals. Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 25;13(5):717. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050717.
- Nair KPST, A B. Stroke rehabilitation : traditional and modern approaches. 2002;
- Tan CO. Is remote rehabilitation after stroke as effective as conventional therapy? Neurology. 2020 Oct 27;95(17):e2462-e2464. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010839. No abstract available.
- Langhorne P, Legg L. Evidence behind stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;74 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv18-iv21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.suppl_4.iv18. No abstract available.
- Johnson MJ, Rai R, Barathi S, Mendonca R, Bustamante-Valles K. Affordable stroke therapy in high-, low- and middle-income countries: From Theradrive to Rehab CARES, a compact robot gym. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017 Jun 1;4:2055668317708732. doi: 10.1177/2055668317708732. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
- Poli P, Morone G, Rosati G, Masiero S. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients' therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:153872. doi: 10.1155/2013/153872. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
- Trombly CA, Ma HI. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, Part I: Restoration of roles, tasks, and activities. Am J Occup Ther. 2002 May-Jun;56(3):250-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.3.250.
- Paci M, Nannetti L, Casavola D, Lombardi B. Differences in motor recovery between upper and lower limbs: does stroke subtype make the difference? Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Jun;39(2):185-7. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000172.
- Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986;8(2):69-73. doi: 10.3109/03790798609166178.
- McCrea PH, Eng JJ, Hodgson AJ. Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Jul 10;24(10):534-41. doi: 10.1080/09638280110115393.
- Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, Fisher M, Pandian J, Lindsay P. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022 Jan;17(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202301097A3
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study were available upon request from
- Contact Name and Email Address: Dr. Kuo-Cheng Liu, email: monhh159@gmail.com
- Type of Data Shared: Individual participant data (IPD) including demographic, assessments, interventions.
- Availability: The dataset will be available upon request after the publication of study results.
- Access Criteria: Researchers can request data by providing a brief description of their intended analysis, which should align with stroke rehabilitation research objectives.
- Consent from Participants: Informed consent was obtained.
- Anonymization Comments: Data will be anonymized to protect participant identities.
- Ethical or Legal Restrictions: Following ethical guidelines and IRB requirements will guide the data-sharing process.
- Other Comments: Participants' consents specify academic and appropriate use of data.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on The Effectiveness of Novel Rehabilitation Device on Upper Limb Impairment Among Patients With Stroke
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...RecruitingChonic Stroke Patients With Motor Impairment of Upper LimbFrance
Clinical Trials on The UE functional training
-
New Jersey Institute of TechnologyRutgers, The State University of New JerseyCompletedHemiplegia | Hemiparesis | Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
Tel Aviv UniversityCompletedHuman Risk Factors | Driving Behavior | Meta-cognition
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung UniversityCompletedStroke | Hemiplegia, SpasticTaiwan
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Maryland, College ParkCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityHugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.CompletedSecondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Tarsus UniversityCompleted
-
i-Function, Inc.Active, not recruitingHealthy Aging | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States