HD+ I-scan Bronchoscopy Vascular Abnormalities Detection Multicenter Study (i-scan)

April 11, 2018 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Value for Vascular Abnormalities of High Definition Bronchoscopy When Combined With I-scan Imaging Technology Compared to High Defintion Bronchoscopy Alone

Videobronchoscopy is an essential diagnostic procedure for evaluation of the central airways and pivotal for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Further technological improvements have resulted in high definition (HD+) images and advanced image enhancement technique (i-scan). An earlier study (NCT01676012) has indicated that HD+ bronchoscopy in combination with i-scan technology is superior to HD+WL (white light) for detecting endobronchial vascular changes. In this study we aim to correlate these vascular changes to histology and hypothesize that these vascular changes are related to (pre-) malignant changes and that the addition of i-scan is superior to HD+ WL.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients will undergo a bronchoscopy with Pentax EB1990i HD-bronchoscope in combination with Pentax EPKi series videoprocessor investigating the entire bronchial tree. Bronchoscopy will be performed by an experienced chest physician under local anaesthesia use and type of sedation following local protocol. Bronchoscopy will be performed in a standardized order using three different imaging modes. The order of the different modes will be randomized to avoid induced scope and / or cough lesion bias. High definition digital videos will be made from all procedures without in screen patient identification, but using a study code. The three imaging modes used in this study are: HD+, HD+ surface enhancement (SE, i-scan1) and HD+ surface enhancement and tone enhancement (TE-c, i-scan2).

When sites with abnormal or suspicious vascular patterns are detected the investigator grade these findings using a visual classification scale [adapted from Herth JTO 2009 & Zaric Med Oncol 2013] and change to a regular bronchoscope and take biopsies from each site and a biopsy from a normal secondary carina on the contralateral site as control. Finally any other indicated procedures will be performed at the discretion of the local investigator.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RA
      • Ravenna, RA, Italy
        • Ospedale Umberto I, Via Dante Alighieri n.1
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboudumc
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • St-Petersburg Research Institute of TB and Thoracic Surgery
      • Murcia, Spain, 30202
        • Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with suspected or proven lung cancer are eligible if there is an indication for bronchoscopy. Eligible are patients with ASA physical status 1-3 and aged 18 years or older.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected or proven lung cancer.
  • ASA physical status 1-3.
  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Signed and dated patient informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding disorders.
  • Indication for use of anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol, warfarin, therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparines or clopidrogel).
  • Known allergy for lidocaine.
  • Known pulmonary hypertension.
  • Recent and/or uncontrolled cardiac disease.
  • Compromised upper airway (eg concomitant head and neck cancer or central airway stenosis for any reason).
  • ASA classification greater than or equal to 4.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Inability to consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
suspected lungcancer

Patients will undergo a bronchoscopy with the Pentax EB1990i HD-bronchoscope investigating the entire bronchial tree. The HD+ bronchoscopy needs to be performed in a standardized way using 3 different imaging modes:

  1. HD+bronchoscopy
  2. HD+bronchoscopy + i-Scan 1
  3. HD+bronchoscopy + i-Scan 2

3 different types of bronchoscopy image settings will be used investigating the entire bronchial tree.

When sites with abnormal or suspicious vascular patterns are detected meeting the criteria of abnormality [visual scale adapted from Herth 2009 and Zaric 2013] the investigator will change to a normal bronchoscope and take biopsies from each site and a biopsy from a normal secondary carina on the contralateral site as control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
positive predictive value of HD+ i-scan bronchoscopy for detecting (pre-) malignant lesions
Time Frame: 7 days
Determing the positive predictive value of HD+ i-scan bronchoscopy for vascular pattern detection .
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between endobronchial vascular patterns and histology
Time Frame: 7 days
relate grading of detected vascular abnormalities with histology outcome of biopsies
7 days
interobserver variability for detecting vascular abnormalities
Time Frame: 3 - 12 months
compare bronchoscopist reported outcome to central review of obtained videos to determine interobserver variability
3 - 12 months
impact of HD-bronchoscopy on clinical decision
Time Frame: 1-56 days
interview based evaluation to investigate whether the use of of i-scan technology and or the outcome of study-detected vascular sites changed the clinical approach or follow-up plan
1-56 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erik HF van der Heijden, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lungcancer

3
Subscribe