The Effect of Fluid Management by SVV of FloTrac/ Vigileo™ Monitoring on Postoperative Recovery in Bowel Resection

During an enterectomy, especially in an open surgery, large amounts of fluid are administered in consideration of the patient's fasted state, maintaining blood pressure during surgery and potential third space loss. However, it has recently been reported that excessive fluid administration during surgery is actually detrimental to patients' prognoses. In fact, several reports have suggested that compared to limited fluid administration, excessive fluid administration increased the length of stay or the chances of complications. Thus, goal-directed fluid optimization is required during surgery because only a proper amount of fluid (neither limited nor excessive) administration can minimize postoperative complications and enhance prognosis. In general, the amount of fluid administered is determined with regard to the patient's volume status, including a comprehensive assessment of vital signs such as the pulse rate and blood pressure, and urine volume. However, this method has limitations in that it is an inadequate indicator of the actual intravascular volume of a patient to determine and administer the proper amount of fluid. Recently, new methods of measuring volume status that are less invasive and more accurate have been introduced. These methods include stroke volume variation (SVV) that monitors changes in arterial pressure waveform amplitudes with regard to breathing patterns. This is an effective method of monitoring fluid responsiveness after placing a catheter via a radial artery puncture. The stroke output is dependent on the preload, afterload, and cardiac contractility. The cardiac output is determined by multiplying the stroke output and heart rate. SVV indicates the difference in stroke output within one breathing cycle. A direct or indirect measurement of stroke output is required, which can be performed by analyzing arterial pressure waveforms via a FloTrac Sensor (Edwards Lifesciences, USA) monitor. SVV is known to have a high fluid responsiveness even during open surgeries, yet there is practically no research data on its effect in patients' postoperative recovery and prognosis in comparison to the traditional methods of fluid administration. Therefore, the investigators will apply SVV via a FloTrac/ Vigileo™ monitor on patients undergoing bowel resection to determine whether it better assists proper fluid administration compared to the traditional method of fluid administration by examining the patients' postoperative prognosis such as bowel movement recovery and length of stay.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Bowel Resection
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Conventional arterial blood pressure monitoring; Device: Stroke volume variation monitoring with arterial blood pressure monitoring

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 62
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
    • Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Health System, Yonsei Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients aged 20 to 70 scheduled to undergo bowel resection open surgery below the ASA class 3

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with significant impairments in heart, kidney, and liver functions
• Patients with arrhythmia such as tachycardia and atrial fibrillation or patients on pacemakers
• Patients diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease or are Allen's test positive
• Patients who underwent surgery on the identical surgical area
• Patients with obesity
• Patients with blood coagulation impairments

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group; For the traditional method group, crystalloid and colloid (maximum 50 ml/kg) are provided through the traditional method of assessing the blood pressure, heart rate and urine volume.	Device: Conventional arterial blood pressure monitoring
Experimental: SVV group; The method of fluid administration to be employed (traditional or SVV via a FloTrac/ EV1000™ monitor) is determined based on the group. Fluid administration is performed in accordance with the group; in general, about 10 ml/kg/h is administered although it may vary for each patient depending on the preoperative fasting, fluid loss during surgery (evaporation, emanation, urination, surgical area, etc.), and blood loss. Crystalloid is administered in the SVV-monitored group with a target below SVV 12%, and a 200-300 ml of colloid (maximum 50 ml/kg) is loaded when SVV is above 12%. If the patient shows hypertension even when SVV is below 12%, a vasoconstrictor should be administered intermittently or consistently.	Device: Stroke volume variation monitoring with arterial blood pressure monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Recovery of bowel movement - gas passing time after bowel resection	To evaluate the difference in bowel movement recovery whether using SVV or not on the fluid management in the patients undergoing open enterectomy, the difference of postoperative gas passing time will be compared.	24 hous

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Yonsei University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 9, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 15, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): August 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 3, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 6, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 13, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 12, 2017
• Last Verified: September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 4-2014-0730