Reducing the Risk of Alarm Fatigue Through the Use of Focused Management in Safety Huddles
Reducine the Risk of Alarm Fatigue Through the Use of Focused Management in Safety Huddles
Context: Alarm fatigue is a threat to hospital patient safety. National surveys reveal that high alarm rates interrupt patient care, reduce trust in alarms, and lead clinicians to disable alarms entirely. Safety huddles offer an appropriate forum for reviewing alarm data and identifying patients whose high alarm rates may necessitate safe tailoring of alarm limits.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a focused physiologic monitor alarm reduction intervention integrated into safety huddles that involves discussing safe monitor parameter adjustments on the physiologic monitor alarm rates of individual patients with high alarm rates who meet "low acuity" criteria.
Study Design: A prospective, quasi-experimental pilot study of the impact of the huddle intervention on the alarm rates of low acuity high alarm rate individual patients discussed in huddles in the PICU. The huddle intervention will consist of a script to facilitate the discussion of the alarm data.
Setting/Participants: Participants will include all low acuity patients and their providers in the PICU at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Study Interventions and Measures: The primary outcome is the rate of crisis and warning alarms per patient day for intervention cases as compared with others in the high alarm / low acuity cohort. Safety measures will include unexpected changes in patient acuity or code blue events within one week of monitor change or discharge.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Eligible primary participants will be the physicians and nurse practitioners caring for the PICU patients who are discussed as part of the huddle interventions. Eligible secondary participants will include all low acuity patients in the PICU at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Inclusion Criteria Primary Subjects: Any physician or nurse practioner caring for an intervention patient or control patient in the PICU at CHOP
Secondary Subjects:
- Low acuity patients as determined by Optilink Guidelines
- High alarm patients (top 10-20%)
- Admission to the PICU
Exclusion Criteria Primary Subjects: None
Secondary Subjects: Patients who are medically ready for transfer out of ICU or discharge home (status continuously tracked by charge nurse). Patients who are medically ready for transfer out have an accepting service in place and a bed ready on the floor.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Primary Subjects
Physicians and nurse practitioners caring for patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).
An alarm reduction script will be used to help facilitate discussion of alarm data during weekday morning team "huddles".
|
The intervention will consist of a script to facilitate the discussion of the alarm data that will take place on weekday mornings.
The script will be used by huddle participants as a structured outline to rapidly discuss the high alarm low acuity patients eligible for intervention.
The patients who are identified will have further discussion on rounds to determine if there are appropriate ways to reduce the alarm rates of individual patients through the safe adjustment of physiologic monitor parameters.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in alarm rate before and after intervention
Time Frame: 24 hours before intervention and 72 hours after intervention
|
Within-subject comparison evaluating the numbers of alarms and the trajectories of alarm rates in the 24 hours before and up to 72 hours after each huddle
|
24 hours before intervention and 72 hours after intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher P Bonafide, MD, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.