Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine and Cystic Tumor

June 10, 2018 updated by: VANBIERVLIET, Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive

Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Under Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guidance in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine and Cystic Tumor

Advances in conventional imaging (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI) are so great that chance to discover a incidental solid or cystic pancreatic lesion is becoming usual. Endocrine tumors have variable malignant potential depending on their size, some malignancy for lesions larger than 2 cm and indefinite for a smaller size. The branch-duct like IPMN (intraductal papillary mucinous pancreatic tumor) involving the pancreatic secondary ducts represent half of pancreatic cystic tumors and may degenerate into 5 to 10% of cases. Signs and risk of degeneration are the presence of mural nodules greater than 5 mm and size > 3 cm, although the latter criterion is discussed. Mucinous cystadenomas could degenerate between 30 and 50% of cases even though the role of size is much discussed (<4 cm). The follow-up imaging is performed using MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A fine needle aspiration for cytology and histology is possible and determination of biological markers is useful. But cytology is often unprofitable due to the poor cellular profile of the cystic pancreatic tumor. Once the diagnosis of suspected malignancy, the patient should be referred to the surgeon for pancreatic resection more or less extensive. But this attitude is facing a significant operative risk with up to 30% of morbidity and mortality between 1 and 3 % for cephalic resections. Some patients with high post operative risks are inoperable. For these reasons, some teams have proposed the destruction of the walls of the cyst under EUS, US or CT control by washing with absolute alcohol content of cystic tumor.

An interesting alternative endoscopic destruction would be the use of radio frequency ablation technique (RFA). RFA is a recognized technique for local tumor destruction by delivering thermal energy to obtain coagulation necrosis of the lesion. Taewong Medical ™ recently developed a radiofrequency needle EUSRA® coupled with a combo VIVA ™ generator for applying RFA sub EUS control. But no prospective study is available at this date regarding the treatment of the cystic or solid tumoral pancreatic lesion with this technique. The primary endpoint of the present study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of this guided radiofrequency probe EUS for the treatment of pancreatic endocrine tumors or inoperable pancreatic cystic tumors. The secondary objective will be the efficiency.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13000
        • Barthet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pancreatic neuro endocrine tumor <2 cm confirmed by pathological reading, or mucinous cystic tumor (branch duct like IPMN with nodule wall > 5 mm unresectable) or mucinous cystadenoma with unresectable wall thickening
  • Unresectable patient or high operative risk
  • Multidisciplinary Collaborative Meeting confirming the indication for treatment.
  • Patients who consented to participate in the study
  • American Society Anesthesiology classification 1, 2 or 3
  • Patient affiliated to the national social security system (beneficiary or assignee)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive carcinoma lesions in a patient whose clinical condition allows to consider a surgical pancreatic resection
  • Severe coagulopathy (PT <50%, partial thromboplastin time > 42 sec), thrombocytopenia (<75,000 G/L), antiplatelets agent
  • Patient under anticoagulant agent (NACO, heparin and warfarin)
  • American Society Anesthesiology classification 4
  • Patient belonging to a so-called vulnerable patient population (pregnancy, nursing, patient trust, guardianship, private patient freedom, ...)
  • Women of childbearing age, including in contraception
  • Pace maker
  • Inability to obtain informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Radiofrequency
Procedure/Surgery Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation under endoscopic ultrasonography guidance of the pancreatic neuro endocrine tumor or mucinous cyst.
Pancreatic radiofrequency ablation under endoscopic ultrasonography guidance Procedure under general anesthesia Punction of the pancreatic lesion and aspiration of the liquid if present / then thermal ablation with a 18G needle (50 W during 10 secondes) - only one session
Other Names:
  • Radiofrequency

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the pancreatic radiofrequency ablation under EUS guidance
Time Frame: At 3 months
using the Cotton Classification
At 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficiency of the pancreatic radiofrequency ablation under EUS guidance
Time Frame: At month 6 and 12
Decrease of the size of the lesion using CT-scan and tumoral response using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criterion
At month 6 and 12
Safety of the pancreatic radiofrequency ablation under EUS guidance
Time Frame: At 7 days, one month, 6 and 12 months
using the Cotton Classification
At 7 days, one month, 6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marc Barthet, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency Ablation under EUS

Subscribe