Role of NGS-based ThyroSeq Panel in Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules

July 3, 2019 updated by: Yuri Nikiforov, University of Pittsburgh

Recently, targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms have been introduced that allow inexpensive testing for hundreds of mutational hotspots at the same time. A number of additional mutational markers in thyroid cancer have been identified. Highly promising markers associated with tumor prognosis have also been found. This multi-institutional study aims to validate the diagnostic use of mutational markers in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

The proposed hypothesis is that a broad NGS-based genotyping of thyroid nodules using a large panel of mutational markers applied to thyroid FNA samples can provide an accurate cancer risk stratification in thyroid nodules.

The performance of the panel will be tested in a multi-institutional double-blind prospective study of FNA samples from thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology and available surgical outcome

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Thyroid cancer is the fifth most common cancer type in women and the fastest growing cancer diagnosis in the U.S. In 2013, an estimated 60,000 new cases were diagnosed. However, thyroid nodules are much more common, particularly in woman and with increased age. The prevalence of palpable nodules in population-based studies is 3-4% and the prevalence of non-palpable nodules incidentally identified on imaging approaches 40-50% after the age of 60. Thyroid cancer is the primary clinical concern in patient with thyroid nodules, although only small proportion (~5%) of thyroid nodules is malignant . The diagnosis of thyroid cancer relies on cervical ultrasound and fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy with cytologic examination. FNA cytology provides a definitive diagnosis of benign or malignant thyroid disease in most cases, although in approximately 30% of nodules, FNA cytology cannot reliably rule out cancer and such cases are reported as indeterminate for malignancy. Because of the lack of a definitive diagnosis, most patients with indeterminate cytology undergo diagnostic surgery to establish histopathologic diagnosis. However, only 20-30% of such surgically resected thyroid nodules will prove to be malignant. It has been estimated that ~150,000 thyroid surgeries are performed in the U.S. for benign nodules due to inability to rule out cancer without surgery. Additionally, an indeterminate preoperative diagnosis does not always lead to the optimal initial surgical intervention for patients who have thyroid cancer, as many of them undergo a two-step surgery, i.e. thyroid lobectomy followed by completion total thyroidectomy. Both unnecessary and two-step surgeries can be avoided with a more accurate preoperative diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules.

For patients who have signed an informed consent, the physician investigator will then perform a research needle wash. The syringe will be rinsed with a buffer solution to gather left over cells for the research sample. This FNA material will be collected for potential molecular testing into a collection tube that is stored at -20C.

The first five samples acquired will be processed irrespective of cytologic diagnosis to evaluate the collection technique.

Those samples that have indeterminate cytologic diagnosis (Bethesda III, VI, or V) and surgical outcome are submitted for molecular testing. (Sample will be given a code that de-identifies the sample before it is sent to the testing laboratory. The lab that will analyze specimens is a CLIA certified Pitt lab.)

Molecular analysis is performed at the Pitt lab without knowing surgical outcome.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

256

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients that undergo a routine diagnostic thyroid FNA that consent in participating in the research study whose samples have indeterminate cytologic diagnosis (Bethesda III, VI, or V) and surgical outcome are submitted for molecular testing. (Sample will be given a code that de-identifies the sample before it is sent to the testing laboratory. The lab that will analyze specimens is a CLIA certified Pitt lab.)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that undergo a clinically diagnostic thyroid FNA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children
  • pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Routine FNA for thyroid nodules
Patients that undergo a clinically diagnostic thyroid FNA will be asked by their clinician, who is a study co-investigator, if they are interested in participating in the research study. A small part of FNA material will be collected for molecular analysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcomes
Time Frame: April 2016
The primary outcome measured in this study is the performance (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) of the Thyroseq Panel in diagnosing cancer in thyroid nodules with Bethesda III, VI and V cytology.
April 2016

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO14040164
  • PITT 9006477 (Other Grant/Funding Number: University of Pittsburgh)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe