Procedural Simulation for Difficult Airway Training in Anesthesiology Resident Education Program (PROSIDIAIR)

July 5, 2016 updated by: Lilot Marc, Claude Bernard University

Anesthesiology Education Implementation by Procedural Simulation Workshop for Difficult Airway Management: a Controlled Interregional French Study

Difficult airway management is a crucial point that may influence outcomes of patient in this critical situation. Education for this topic is of main importance for resident of anesthesiology. Procedural simulation workshop allows participant to use device dedicated to difficult airway management. Investigators included this workshop to a state education program of anesthesiology resident in second year and compared to their homonym in another state where no specific organized workshop is integrated to the education program.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Difficult airway management is a crucial point that may influence outcome of patient in this critical situation. Education for this topic is of main importance for resident of anesthesiology. Procedural simulation workshop allows participant to use device dedicated to difficult airway management. The investigators included this workshop for smal groups of 6-10 anesthesiology resident from Rhône Alpes Auvergne french state. Participants were ask to fill out a questionnaire about their specific knowledge and experience of several devices usable in difficult airway management situation. The workshop was a small briefing as an introduction to the workshop and then small workshop of 20-45 min for specific procedural use of different devices for difficult airway management : Eischmann guide, LMA, supraglottic devices, fiberoptic with spontaneous breathing, cricothyroidotomy, jet ventilation, percutaneous tracheotomy... Investigator will compare at 6 month the incidence of use of the difficult airway devices between resident from rhone alpes auvergne following the workshop and resident from Montpellier that did not follow specific organized workshop.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhône-Alpes
      • Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France, 69007
        • CLESS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Residents in 2nd year of anesthesiology residency in Rhones alpes auvergne and in Nîmes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion demand from the participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: workshop
workshop of procedural simulation
workshop for procedural simulation for education in difficult airway situation
No Intervention: control
no specific workshop of procedural simulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of use of airway devices between groups
Time Frame: 6 month
modification in the incidence of use of airway devices between workshop and control groups
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
confidence with airway device
Time Frame: 6 month
questionnaire of confidence with the usability of the devices. Scale from 0 to 10.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CLESS PROSIDIAIR 2014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

data will be analysed by group, no plan to share data has been programmed

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behaviour

Clinical Trials on workshop

Subscribe