Nocebo Education to Reduce the Potential Unintended Harms of Mental Health Awareness

February 16, 2025 updated by: Daria Sandra, University of Toronto

This project has two aims. First, the research team will confirm whether providing a mental health awareness workshop poses unintended harms by raising the rate of self-diagnosis (as opposed to a neutral workshop) and causing worsening symptoms in previously healthy young adults over a period of one week. The study will focus on determining this in the context of ADHD, as it includes broad symptoms that overlap with normal experience, is commonly overdiagnosed, and is included in many awareness campaigns for neurodiversity and mental health.

Second, the study will test whether nocebo effect education, or in other words, learning about the nocebo effects, during mental health awareness sessions "inoculates" against them. Simply learning about the role negative expectations play in creating side effects has been shown to reduce nocebo side effects of medications; perhaps, the same applies to mental health.

Researchers will compare the outcome of the ADHD workshop with that of the same workshop but with nocebo information included; both experimental conditions will also be compared to an active control condition. Participants are hypothesised to report the following pattern of symptoms:

ADHD information > ADHD + nocebo education > Control

During the study participants will:

  1. Randomize the participants to one of the three workshop conditions to watch
  2. Report self-diagnosis score immediately after the workshop and 1 week later.
  3. Report symptoms 1 week later.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rates of mental health problems have risen dramatically in North America and around the world. The high rates of mental health problems led to more mental health awareness efforts on university campuses, in the workplaces, and online. These efforts have greatly destigmatised mental health and increased help seeking across all ages, but may also induce the nocebo effect: it may create negative expectations about one's mental health status and thus paradoxically worsen the very symptoms they try to prevent. Nocebo effect is well known to cause various negative outcomes in medicine, such as worse medication side effects. For instance, when the person takes the drug, she can have negative expectations about having side effects and experience them due to misinterpreting normal but ambiguous physical sensations as the relevant side effects. Mental health awareness campaigns may follow the same pattern: they may reframe normal difficulties that are typical of emerging adulthood as early symptoms of psychiatric disorders, thus exacerbating mental health concerns. Experts are now calling for more balanced approaches to mental health awareness that provide necessary information without causing unintended harms.

This will be a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether mental health awareness induces worsening of symptoms (unintended harms) and whether nocebo education can reduce or inoculate against these. Participants in this study will be recruited from the University of Toronto community and complete the study in small to medium sized groups.

Groups of participants will be assigned to one of the three conditions using block randomisation (in a 1:1:1 ratio). The three conditions will include two experimental conditions and an active control: ADHD information workshop, ADHD information with nocebo education workshop, or a control sleep education workshop. Participants will report their ADHD symptoms and rates of self-diagnosis prior to participating in the workshop, immediately after (self-diagnosis), and at one-week follow-up (both).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

215

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M1C 1A4
        • University of Toronto

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. No existing diagnosis of ADHD, or history/current diagnosis of any other neurological/psychiatric disorder.
  2. Score below 18 on the Adult ADHD Self-Reported Symptom (ASRS) Checklist Screener.
  3. No current intake of medication to treat a psychiatric disorder (e.g., antidepressants)
  4. Fluent in English;
  5. Access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone with internet capability;
  6. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of ADHD or any other neurological/psychiatric disorder.
  2. Active intake of medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ADHD information workshop
ADHD information workshop that will be delivered by a clinical psychology student in one 30-minute session to a group of participants. The workshop will present information about lesser-known or commonly misdiagnosed ADHD symptoms. To control for the duration of the nocebo module (see the condition below), participants will also learn about sleep and its relevance for maintenance of good cognitive health. At the end, the workshop will involve a writing reflection activity about personal experiences with ADHD symptoms.
Experimental: ADHD information workshop with nocebo education
ADHD information workshop that will be delivered by a clinical psychology student in one 30-minute session to a group of participants. The workshop will present information about lesser-known or commonly misdiagnosed ADHD symptoms, together with a module on nocebo effects and their potential role in worsening symptoms. The nocebo module will describe the current understanding of the role of expectations in creating side effects and elaborate on how this applies to the field of mental health through a series of examples. It will also involve a writing reflection activity about personal experiences with ADHD symptoms, potential for nocebo effect when talking about ADHD symptoms, and ability to apply this information to personal experiences.
Active Comparator: Sleep and dreams workshop
An information workshop about sleep and dream experiences that will be delivered by a clinical psychologist in one 30-minute session to a group of participants. It will be matched on duration, type of content, and engagingness with the experimental sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported ADHD symptoms
Time Frame: Change 1 week
As measured by Adult ADHD Self-Reported Symptom Scale (ASRS), a self-reported scale of ADHD symptoms with a score range of 0-72, with a higher score indicating worse symptoms.
Change 1 week
Self-diagnosis with ADHD
Time Frame: Change: Immediate, 1 week
As measured by one item with a score range from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating stronger self-diagnosing belief.
Change: Immediate, 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Memory Failures
Time Frame: Change, 1 week
Measured by Memory Failures Scale (MFS), a self-reported scale. The scale ranges in scores from 12-60, where a higher score indicates more failures.
Change, 1 week
Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Change, 1 week
As measured by the Kessler General Distress Scale (K10). The scale score ranges from 10 to 50, where higher scores indicate more symptoms.
Change, 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 45738

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Researchers will share anonymised data by depositing it in a data repository (e.g., Open Science Framework).

We will also provide the statistical analysis plan for the data analysis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on ADHD information workshop

Subscribe