Computerized Adaptative Testing of Self-perceived Quality of Care in Psychiatry (QDSPsyCAT)

Development and Implementation of a Computerized Adaptative Testing (CAT) of Self-perceived Quality of Care in Psychiatry

Objectives

  1. to develop and validate a Computerized Adaptative Testing (CAT) of self-perceived quality of care in Psychiatry.
  2. to analyze the implementation of this new measure in clinical practice : qualitative analysis of the relationship patient/professional.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective and multicentric study

  1. Development and validation of the CAT. 4 steps :

    • Elaboration of a pool of items, based on literature review and interview with patients.
    • Selection of the most relevant items based on a qualitative approach using cognitive interview with patients.
    • Calibration of the item bank : the psychometric properties of the item bank will be based on classical test and item response theories and approaches, including the evaluation of unidimensionality, item response theory model fitting, and analyses of differential item functioning.
    • Metrological validation of the CAT.
  2. Analysis of the implementation of the CAT in clinical practice using interview with professionals and patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital de la conception Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or depression according DSM V
  • criteria
  • age over 18 years
  • informed consent to participate
  • French as the native language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis other than schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or depression according DSM V criteria
  • decompensated organic disease, and mental retardation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: psychiatric patients
patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or depression according DSM V criteria
  • Elaboration of a pool of items, based on literature review and interview with patients.
  • Selection of the most relevant items based on a qualitative approach using cognitive interview with patients.
  • Calibration of the item bank : the psychometric properties of the item bank will be based on classical test and item response theories and approaches, including the evaluation of unidimensionality, item response theory model fitting, and analyses of differential item functioning.
  • Metrological validation of the CAT.
  • Analysis of the implementation of the CAT in clinical practice using interview with professionals and patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of care
Time Frame: 19 months
computerized Adaptative Testing
19 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014-22

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe