Evaluation of a Multi-professional Breathlessness Service for Patients With Breathlessness Due to Any Advanced Disease (BreathEase)

August 8, 2019 updated by: Claudia Bausewein, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Randomised Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a New Multi-professional Breathlessness sErvice for Patients With Any Advanced diSease Against Usual Care (BreathEase)

Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in patients with advanced diseases like cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF) or lung fibrosis, which broadly impacts on patients' quality of life and may result in high burden for carers.

This single-blinded randomized controlled fast track trial evaluates the effectiveness of a multi-professional breathlessness service in patients with advanced and chronic diseases. The intervention group will get immediate access to the breathlessness service whereas the control group will receive standard care and get access to the service after a waiting time of eight weeks. Primary endpoints are mastery of breathlessness and quality of life, measured with the CRQ (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire) as well as the reduction of symptom burden of patients and burden of carers. The evaluation of the cost effectiveness of the breathlessness service from the perspective of the German health system is a further study aim.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

183

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81377
        • Hospital of the University of Munich, Department of Palliative Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients affected by breathlessness due to any advanced life-limiting and progressive disease, despite treatment of the underlying condition and
  • Patients capable (in a cognitive and functional manner) to participate in the intervention including outpatient clinic and physiotherapist visits as well as self- management
  • If patients are suffering from acute exacerbations of the underlying conditions, they are put on a waiting list for two to four weeks and are then entered into the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from breathlessness due to chronic hyperventilation syndrome, asthma or any other unknown cause
  • Cancer patients under concurrent initial or full dose systemic treatment or radiotherapy (except on maintenance therapy)
  • Patients participating in any trial targeting the treatment of underlying conditions/ illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention Group
Patients randomised to the intervention group will get immediate access to the Multi-professional breathlessness service (MBS).
Patients visit the MBS twice. At week 1, delivered by palliative care specialists and respiratory disease specialists, patients receive an detailed assessment of breathlessness, relevant symptoms beyond breathlessness, psychosocial issues and carer burden. Recommendations are provided, and reviewed at the concluding visit in week 6 with palliative care specialists. In between these visits, weekly physiotherapy sessions focus on positioning, breathing techniques, exercise as well as pacing and fatigue management. Further support from the multi-professional expert team is given as needed.
OTHER: Control Group
Patients randomised to the control group will get delayed MBS intervention. They will receive standard care and get access to the service after a waiting time of eight weeks.
Patients will wait 8 weeks for start of intervention and will receive standard care in the meantime with access to respiratory medicine, general practitioners and palliative care services as needed. Standard care includes support by their general practitioners and disease orientated treatment (e.g. anti-obstructive treatment, oxygen supply if indicated, chemotherapy).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mastery of breathlessness (CRQ mastery subscale)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Change from baseline in Mastery of breathlessness (at week 8) measured with the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) in a face-to-face interview. Mastery represents one of the four CRQ domains containing 4 items. Patients rate their experience on each item a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). The subscale "Mastery" is calculated by averaging the scores of the 4 items belonging to this subscale.
From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Quality of Life (CRQ)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Change from baseline in Quality of Life (at week 8) measured with the CRQ. The CRQ contains 20 items across four domains: dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, and mastery. Quality of life is calculated by adding all responses to all 20 items. Patients rate their experience on each item a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment)
From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Symptom Burden (IPOS)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Change from baseline in palliative care needs and specific symptoms (at week 8) assessed with the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS). The IPOS includes 10 symptoms and 7 questions on patients and carers emotional situation, spiritual concerns, and provision of information and support. The overall profile score is the sum of the scores from each of the 17 questions.
From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Carers' burden of disease (ZBI)
Time Frame: From Baseline to End of Intervention (0, 8, 16 weeks)
Change from baseline in carers' burden (at week 8) assessed with the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI), measuring personal strain and role strain. The revised version contains 22 items. Each item is a statement which the carer is asked to endorse using a 5-point scale. Response options range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always).
From Baseline to End of Intervention (0, 8, 16 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breathlessness severity (NRS)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Change from baseline in breathlessness severity (at week 8) measured with numerical rating scales (NRS). The NRS will be used to assess breathlessness over the last 24 hours on average,at rest and on exercise. Responses on a rating scale range from 1 (no breathlessness) to 10 (strongest imaginable breathlessness).
From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Generic health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)

Change from baseline in patients' generic health-related quality of life measured with the EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level Self Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 pages - the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire ranges from 0 to 100 (with 0 representing the worst health the patient can imagine and 100 representing the best health the patient can imagine). Value sets of the EuroQol Group by time trade-off (TTO) will be used for scoring algorithm.

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument applicable to a wide range of health conditions for use as a measure of health and is especially suited to cost effectiveness analyses.

From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Costs of health service utilization in Euros
Time Frame: From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Mean costs of intervention and control group (excluding study related costs) will be estimated. To calculate sum of costs in Euros per group to receive one aggregated outcome, firstly the following resource use data will be collected: Outpatient care, Medication, Medical aids, Inpatient care, Nursing home/hospice, Rehabilitation, Remedies (physiotherapy, massage, other), Formal care, Home help, Informal care, Work absenteeism, and early retirement. Secondly, resource use categories will be monetarily valued using unit cost and multiplied with the collected amount of resource use. Thirdly, mean costs in Euros per group will be calculated.
From Baseline to Follow-Up (0, 8, 16, 28 weeks)
Patient survival measured in days
Time Frame: From randomization until death, up to end of study (24 months)
Survival is defined as time from randomization to death irrespective of the cause of death. Participants who will not die during study course will be censored at the time of last contact which is planned for week 28 after last patient in. Survival status will be assessed by phone for all participants.
From randomization until death, up to end of study (24 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Bausewein, Prof.Dr.med., Munich University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 2, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Multi-professional breathlessness service (MBS)

Subscribe