The Efficacy of an Acupuncture Protocol and Use of Taping in the Treatment of Spastic Upper Limb After Stroke

February 25, 2016 updated by: Fernanda Cechetti
The purpose of this study is to determine whether acupuncture and taping are effective in the treatment of spastic upper limb after stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acupuncture and taping have emerged as treatment alternatives for many diseases with positive and satisfactory results.

Thus, acupuncture seeks to balance all physiological systems, using specific points on the body where needles are inserted.

In turn, the use of taping is associated to various benefits such as improved blood and lymphatic function. In addition, it assists in the correction of muscle function and in the decrease of pain for neurological suppression. The constant afferent mechanical and somatosensory stimuli are perceived in cortical level and may produce motor unit recruitment and contribute to neuroplasticity of the nervous system.

Thus, this research aims to analyze the effects of Acupuncture associated with Functional Taping on patients' upper limb with chronic hemiparesis after Stroke through a prospective, randomized intervention. Seventy-five patients will be evaluated before and after intervention with Acupuncture and / or Function Taping, divided into three groups (Acupuncture, Functional Taping and Acupuncture plus Functional Taping). The evaluation will consist of Isokinetic, Mini-Mental State Examination, Modified Ashworth Scale, Motor Activity Log, Wolf Motor Function Test and Visual Analog Scale of Pain. The results will be analyzed and presented descriptively, as of statistical comparisons of pre- and post-treatment and the relationship between the groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 90050170
        • Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stroke diagnosis for at least six (06) months, who present hemiparesis in upper limb;
  • To accept participate in the study by signing theTerms of Consent;
  • Do not have any cognitive impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not follow the inclusion criteria;
  • To present shoulder subluxation or dislocation, shoulder pain syndrome or amputations (with or without the use of aids);
  • To present any allergic reaction due to use of bandage and/or do not adapt to treatment with needles.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Acupuncture Only
Patients will be treated with acupuncture only.
Acupuncture needles are inserted in specific acupuncture points on the boby (three points on both forearms and five points on the top of the head) for twenty minutes, three times a week, during twelve sessions.
Active Comparator: Functional Taping Only
Patients will be treated with taping only.
Elastic taping is positioned directly on the skin (on the back of the fingers, hand, forearm and arm - paretic upper limb), three times a week, during twelve sessions. The patient should keep the taping on the skin for two days.
Experimental: Acupuncture and Functional Taping
Patients will be treated with both acupuncture and taping at the same session.
Acupuncture needles are inserted in specific acupuncture points on the boby (three points on both forearms and five points on the top of the head) for twenty minutes, then elastic taping is positioned directly on skin (on the back of the fingers, hand, forearm and arm - paretic upper limb). Both procedures are performed three times a week, during twelve sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of level of spasticity of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of functionality of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using the Wolf Motor Function Test
Time Frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
Wolf Motor Function Test
Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
The change of frequency of movement of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention
Time Frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
Motor Activity Log
Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
The change of quality of movement of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention
Time Frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
Motor Activity Log
Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
The change of amplitude of movement after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using Manual Goniometer
Time Frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
Manual Goniometry
Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
The change of level of pain in upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain
Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of Cognitive Impairment required to include the patient in the study assessed using Mini Mental State Examination.
Time Frame: Immediately before the inclusion of patient in the study (before the first session of intervention).
Mini Mental State Examination
Immediately before the inclusion of patient in the study (before the first session of intervention).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz, Doctor, Federal Universiity of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe