Combination of Metformin/Inulin vs Inulin on Adiponectin in Metabolic Syndrome

May 17, 2016 updated by: Fernando Grover Paez, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Mexico

Effect of the Combination Metformin/Inulin vs Inulin on Adiponectin in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome

Presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its relation with insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease is of great concern. The study of certain adipokines such as adiponectin has demonstrated an inverse association with insulin resistance, especially in Latin population lower levels of adiponectin have been observed compared to other ethnic groups. It appears to be an important molecule that is involved in limiting the pathogenesis of obesity-linked disorders and may have potential benefits as a marker to evaluate the effect of possible interventions on the MetS components and its complications.

Metformin is treatment of choice in patients with MetS, due to its low cost and pharmacological comparable effects with thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone), it decreases hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, free fatty acids and triglycerides, it produces as well, a moderate weight loss, improves lipid profile and delays the appearance of diabetes mellitus in subjects with an abnormal fasting glucose.

A second choice to lower the risks would be the addition of a fiber like inulin, a prebiotic, since it has demonstrated metabolic benefits on lipid and carbohydrates metabolism by several mechanisms proposed such as induction of lipogenic enzymes by glucose, production of short-chained fatty acids, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and growth of Bifidobacterium. A good natural source of inulin is the agave.

It is expected that the combination of metformin plus agave inulin will produce a beneficial impact through pharmacological synergism and that will produce changes in the pathophysiology of MetS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective was to compare the effect of the administration of Metformin/agave inulin vs. Agave inulin on adiponectin in patients with MetS. The investigators conducted a double-blinded randomized trial, on 4 groups, each group with 10 male patients of 40-80 years of age with METS diagnosed by International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. Randomization determined the group assignation during the 12-week trial, each group consisted of:

Group (A) Metformin plus agave inulin: 10 individuals received metformin in a dosis of 500 mg per day (1 tablet of 500 mg) plus inulin in a dosis of 10 mg per day (5 mg every 12 hours) during 12 weeks.

Group (B) Metformin plus Placebo of agave inulin: 10 individuals received Metformin in a dosis of 500mg per day (with the first bite of the second meal) plus homologue placebo of inulin (calcinated magnesia) in a dosis of 10 mg every 24 hrs (5 mg of calcinated magnesia powder every 12 hours) during 12 weeks.

Group (C) Agave inulin plus Placebo of Metformin: 10 individuals received inulin in a dosis of 10 mg every 24 hrs (5 mg every 12 hours) plus homologate placebo of metformin (calcinated magnesia) in a dosis of 500 mg per day (with the first bite of the second meal) during 12 weeks.

Group (D) Placebo of Agave inulin plus Placebo of Metformin: homologate placebo of Inulin (calcinated magnesia powder) in a dosis of 10 mg every 24 hrs (5 mg every 12 hours) plus homologate placebo of metformin (calcinated magnesia capsules) in a dosis of 500 mg per day (with the first bite of the second meal) during 12 weeks.

The clinical findings and laboratory test included a metabolic profile and biosafety, which was determined at baseline and at 12 weeks.

Waist, body weight, body fat, body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure were determined at baseline, follow up and final visit, likewise, a blood sample was obtained, centrifuged and stored at -80° degrees Celsius to be analyzed after within 30 days. The investigators assessed glucose, total cholesterol, c-HDL, c-LDL, triglycerides by enzymatic techniques, and adiponectin and insulin by ELISA. Insulin resistance (IR) was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) with the formula for the HOMA (fasting insulin mcg/L x (fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5) Adverse events and adherence to treatment were documented every 4 weeks.

Statistical analysis: Values were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Mann-Whitney U Test, Wilcoxon exact test and Kruskal-Wallis. A statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jalisco, México
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, México, Mexico, 44100
        • Universidad de Guadalajara

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome by IDF criteria

    • a person to be defined as having the metabolic syndrome they must have: Central obesity (defined as waist circumference* with ethnicity specific values) ≥80 cm in females and ≥90 cm in males; and plus any two of the following four factors:
    • Raised triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality Reduced HDL cholesterol
    • < 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in males < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in females or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality
    • Raised blood pressure systolic BP ≥ 130 or diastolic BP ≥ 85 mm Hg or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension
    • Raised fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L), or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes
  • Age ranging from 40 to 80 years old
  • Male patients
  • Informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Kidney disease
  • Hepatic disease
  • Thyroid disease
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Drug consumption
  • Alcohol consumption of more than 2 ounces daily
  • Consumption of drugs that intervene with lipid or glucose metabolism 2 months before
  • Blood pressure >160/100 mmHg.
  • Lack of adherence to treatment (adherence <80%)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Agave inulin + Metformin
5 g of Agave inulin powder every 12 hrs + 500 mg tablet of metformin every 24 hrs
Metformin in tablet presentation of 500 mg
Other Names:
  • GLUCOPHAGE
Inulin in powder obtained from agave plant, it was given to each patient a full 10 mg container.
Active Comparator: Metformin + Placebo of agave inulin
500 mg tablet of metformin every 24 hrs + 5 g every 12 hrs of calcinated magnesia powder
Metformin in tablet presentation of 500 mg
Other Names:
  • GLUCOPHAGE
Calcinated magnesia powder
Active Comparator: Agave Inulin+Placebo of Metformin
5 g of agave inulin powder every 12 hrs + 500 mg tablet of calcinated magnesia as metformin placebo every 24 hrs
Inulin in powder obtained from agave plant, it was given to each patient a full 10 mg container.
Calcinated magnesia tablet
Placebo Comparator: Placebo of Inulin + Placebo of Metformin
5 g of calcinated magnesia powder every 12 hrs + 500 mg tablet of calcinated magnesia every 24 hrs
Calcinated magnesia powder
Calcinated magnesia tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline on adiponectin levels (ng/mL) at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention determination of adiponectin using ELISA following the suppliers recommendations
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Fasting plasma glucose at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention by glucose oxidase
12 weeks
Change from Baseline in Total cholesterol at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention by spectrophotometry
12 weeks
Change from Baseline in Triglycerides at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention by spectrophotometry
12 weeks
Change from baseline in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention by spectrophotometry
12 weeks
Changes of Insulin levels from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention by ELISA
12 weeks
Change of HOMA-IR from base line to 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention by using the formula for the homeostasis model assessment index (FI x (fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22.5)
12 weeks
Change of waist circumference
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Measured with a non elastic tape at baseline and after intervention
12 weeks
Change of body mass index
Time Frame: 12 weeks
before and after intervention using a tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance analyzer (body composition analyzer
12 weeks
Change from baseline in Peripheral systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention using a digital sphygmomanometer
12 weeks
Change from baseline in Peripheral diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Before and after intervention using a digital sphygmomanometer
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: FERNANDO GROVER, PhD, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Therapeutics (INTEC), CUCS, University of Guadalajara

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Metformin

3
Subscribe