Feasibility of Perioperative Stellate Ganglion Blocks in Cardiac Surgery

April 22, 2019 updated by: Christopher Connors, MD

Based upon Northern New England Cardiovascular Study Group data, the rate of post operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) requiring treatment following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Maine Medical Center (MMC) is currently 30%. Nationally, POAF occurs in up to 40% of patients post CABG, 50% of patients after valve surgery, 64% of patients post mitral valve and CABG and 49% after aortic valve replacement. Atrial fibrillation worsens a patient's hemodynamic status and increases the risk of congestive heart failure (CHF), embolic events and longer ICU stays leading to increased patient morbidity and strain on financial resources. In the U.S., POAF carries a higher risk of stroke (37% OR 2.0 in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.7), worsened survival (74% versus 87%), and an additional 4.9 days and $10,000-$11,500 in hospital stay costs.

Atrial fibrillation requires both an initiation trigger and favorable environment for maintenance and the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems play important roles in this regard. Unfortunately, the precise mechanisms of POAF are still being investigated. This postoperative complication has persisted in spite of efforts to mitigate it pharmacologically with beta blockers and amiodarone, an experience shared by most other cardiac surgery centers.

The stellate ganglion is formed by the fusion of the inferior cervical sympathetic ganglion and first thoracic sympathetic ganglion. By modulating the sympathetic component of the autonomic nervous system, stellate ganglion stimulation has been shown to facilitate induction of atrial fibrillation while ablation may reduce or prevent episodes. Human studies have further supported this model.

Preliminary studies of perioperative stellate ganglion block (SGB) in cardiac surgery suggest that this technique may reduce or prevent episodes of POAF requiring treatment. The investigator's ultimate goal is to determine whether SGB reduces the incidence of POAF in specific cardiac surgery populations at MMC. First, however, the investigator proposes to test the hypothesis that SGB, performed perioperatively by cardiac anesthesiologists in a population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, is both safe and clinically feasible.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients at MMC undergoing transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA TAVR) routinely receive a paravertebral block for analgesia. This has the added benefit of providing a unilateral sympathectomy which may be analogous to a stellate ganglion block, albeit via a different technique. In a recent retrospective chart review, TA TAVR block patients showed a decreased rate of new onset POAF. Furthermore, when studying whether pre-emptive stellate ganglion block increases the patency of radial artery grafts in coronary bypass surgery, researchers found a statistically significant decrease (p = 0.048) in atrial fibrillation and the use of anti-arrhythmic agents. Unfortunately, this was a secondary outcome in a small patient population and, while suggestive, the study was not sufficiently powered to draw a definitive conclusion. Importantly, however, they reported no complications related to the block in the fifty patients who received an intervention. Lastly, an additional study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of stellate ganglion mapping and ablation during CABG while also suggesting a clinically significant effect on POAF, but used a permanent, technically complex and time intensive procedure.

The investigator's hypothesis is that perioperative SGB in cardiac surgery is clinically efficient and efficacious. To address this, the investigator will:

  1. Recruit 49 patients to undergo perioperative SGB during prior to cardiac surgery (CABG, CABG/Aortic Valve Replacement, Aortic Valve Replacement).
  2. Monitor the safety of SGB using post procedure surface ultrasound of the neck and active solicitation on Post-op Day (POD) 0 and 1 for identified complications, in addition to routine clinical monitoring.
  3. Assess clinical feasibility of SGB by measuring procedural efficacy and efficiency:

    1. Efficacy will be measured using post procedure hand temperature; success is indicated by an increase greater than 1 degree Celsius.
    2. Efficiency will be measured as the time to complete the block and the time added to the standard anesthesia induction sequence, as a proportion of total time in the operating room.

Significance: If the investigator is able to demonstrate that perioperative SGB in cardiac surgery is safe and clinically feasible, the next step will be to design a study to investigate the effect of SGB on POAF incidence (and thereby its attendant morbidity, mortality and costs) in this clinical population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • scheduled for AVR, CABG, or CABG/AVR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 years
  • pregnant women
  • prisoners
  • patients having emergency surgery
  • patients with any clinical contraindication to SGB, including: amide local anesthetic allergy or hypersensitivity, carotid vascular disease as defined by ipsilateral prior carotid endarterectomy or carotid stent, superficial infection at the proposed puncture site, contralateral phrenic or laryngeal nerve palsies
  • patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as defined by the need for home oxygen
  • patients who do not speak or write English or are unable to give informed consent
  • patients with a history of atrial fibrillation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stellate Ganglion Block
All patients in the study will receive a stellate ganglion block in order to asses the feasibility and efficacy of this procedure performed by cardiac anesthesiologists in the operating room.
After induction of general anesthesia, patients will receive a stellate ganglion block using a standard and well described paratracheal technique, which typically requires about 3 minutes to perform. The patient's head will be extended and a 4-5-cm, 22-gauge needle inserted at the medial edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle just below the level of the cricoid cartilage at the level of the transverse process of C6 (Chassaignac's tubercle) or C7 (3-5 cm above the clavicle). The non-operative hand will retract the muscle together with the carotid sheath prior to needle insertion. After advancing to the transverse process the needle will be withdrawn 2-3 mm prior to injection. A negative aspiration test will be performed in two planes before a 1-ml test dose is used to exclude unintentional intravascular injection (vertebral or subclavian arteries) or subarachnoid injection into the dural sleeve.4 A total of 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success of Stellate Ganglion Block
Time Frame: day of surgery
Correct placement of stellate ganglion block as measured by a temperature rise of at least 1 degree Celsius in the ipsilateral hand
day of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 1 year
The current rate of atrial fibrillation is measured by the Northern New England Cardiac Database, this existing database will track a-fib rates until the patients are discharged from the hospital after surgery.
Through study completion, approximately 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Connors, MD, MaineHealth

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Stellate Ganglion Block

3
Subscribe