- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02806518
Dynamic Infrared Thermography as an Alternative to CT Angiography (DIRT)
Evaluation of Dynamic Infrared Thermography as an Alternative to CT Angiography for Perforator Mapping in Breast Reconstruction
Study Overview
Detailed Description
In deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction the blood supply to the DIEP flap is reestablished by anastomosing the perforator to the internal mammary vessels. The selected perforator is crucial for flap survival as it is the only source of blood supply to the flap. CTA allows for precise anatomical description of the origin of perforators, their intramuscular course and point of fascia penetration but expose the patient to ionizing radiation and an intravenous contrast medium.
DIRT is an imaging method that does not require ionizing radiation or contrast injection. The study evaluates if DIRT can be an alternative to CTA in perforator mapping. The study is performed in a hospital where DIRT and CTA have been established preoperative imaging methods that have been used for several years as routine examinations for all DIEP breast reconstruction patients.
25 patients scheduled for secondary breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap are included. Preoperatively, the lower abdomen is examined with hand-held Doppler, DIRT and CTA. Arterial Doppler sound locations are marked on the skin.
DIRT examination involves rewarming of the abdominal skin after a mild cold challenge. The locations of hot spots on DIRT are compared with the arterial Doppler sound locations. The rate and pattern of rewarming of the hot spots are analyzed. Multiplanar CT reconstructions are used to see if hot spots are related to perforators on CTA and intraoperative findings.
When intraoperative findings confirm that a useful perforator is located at the same localization as indicated with DIRT, this perforator is used for DIEP breast reconstruction. Postoperatively the surgical outcome and possible complications related to the selected perforator are evaluated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Trom
-
Tromsø, Trom, Norway, 9038
- University Hospital of North Norway
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for breast reconstruction with DIEP flap
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior breast reconstruction / abdominal flap surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Women scheduled for DIEP
Women scheduled for DIEP breast reconstruction after mastectomy due to breast cancer are examined with DIRT, hand-held Doppler and CTA
|
An infrared camera is used to capture video sequences of thermal images before, during and after exposure of the lower abdomen to a cold challenge.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of DIRT with hand-held Doppler, CTA and intraoperative findings
Time Frame: Preoperative
|
Comparison of localization of hot spots on DIRT and arterial Doppler sound locations, perforators on CTA and useful perforators seen intraoperatively
|
Preoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical results
Time Frame: First postoperative month
|
Registration of flap failure (patients operated with DIEP based on perforator indicated with DIRT)
|
First postoperative month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sven Weum, MD PhD, Associate professor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- de Weerd L, Weum S, Mercer JB. The value of dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in perforatorselection and planning of free DIEP flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Sep;63(3):274-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b597d8.
- Cina A, Salgarello M, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P, Bonomo L. Planning breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforating vessels: multidetector CT angiography versus color Doppler US. Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):979-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091166. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
- Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Current techniques in preoperative imaging for abdomen-based perforator flap microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Jan;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244806. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
- Blondeel PN, Beyens G, Verhaeghe R, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Monstrey SJ, Matton G. Doppler flowmetry in the planning of perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1998 Apr;51(3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(98)80010-6.
- de Weerd L, Mercer JB, Weum S. Dynamic infrared thermography. Clin Plast Surg. 2011 Apr;38(2):277-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.03.013.
- Weum S, Mercer JB, de Weerd L. Evaluation of dynamic infrared thermography as an alternative to CT angiography for perforator mapping in breast reconstruction: a clinical study. BMC Med Imaging. 2016 Jul 15;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12880-016-0144-x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2009/17(REK)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.