Augmenting Cognitive Training In Older Adults (ACT)

April 15, 2024 updated by: University of Florida
A two-phase adaptive randomized clinical trial will examine the individual and combined impact of pairing cognitive training with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a method of non-invasive brain stimulation that directly stimulates brain regions involved in active cognitive function and could enhance neural plasticity when paired with a training task. We will compare changes in cognitive and brain function resulting from CT and ET combined with tDCS using a comprehensive neurocognitive, clinical, and multimodal neuroimaging assessment of brain structure, function, and metabolic state. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) will be used to assess brain response during working memory, attention, and memory encoding; the active cognitive abilities trained by CT. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) will assess cerebral metabolites, including GABA concentrations sensitive to neural plasticity. We hypothesize that: 1) tDCS will enhance neurocognitive function, brain function, and functional outcomes from CT, with combined CT and tDCS providing the most benefit; 2) Effects of tDCS on CT will be maintained up to 12 months following training, and 3) Neuroimaging biomarkers of cerebral metabolism, neural plasticity (GABA concentrations) and functional brain response (FMRI) during resting vs. active cognitive tasks will predict individual response to tDCS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

379

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85721
        • University of Arizona
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32606
        • Village of Gainesville
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 89 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age 65 to 89 years; this age group was selected because it is at high risk of age-related cognitive decline and have a sufficiently long life expectancy to participate in the study.
  2. Evidence of age-related cognitive decline in the Cognitive Training assessment defined by performance below the 80th percentile.
  3. Ability to participate in the intervention and attend training sessions; willingness to be randomized to either treatment group.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Neurological disorders (e.g., dementia, stroke, seizures, traumatic brain injury).
  2. Evidence of cognitive impairment (as defined by NACC UDS performance below 1.5 standard deviations on age/sex/education normative data in at least one cognitive domain).
  3. Past opportunistic brain infection.
  4. Major psychiatric illness (schizophrenia, intractable affective disorder, current substance dependence diagnosis or severe major depression and/or suicidality.
  5. Unstable (e.g., cancer other than basal cell skin) and chronic (e.g. severe diabetes) medical conditions.
  6. MRI contraindications (e.g., claustrophobia, metal implants).
  7. Physical impairment precluding motor response or lying still for 1 hr and inability to walk two blocks without stopping.
  8. Currently on GABA-ergic or glutamatergic medications, or on sodium channel blockers.
  9. Left-handedness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation
This arm receives cognitive training combined with active tDCS.
Cognitive Training employs an eight component, PositScience BrainHQ suite via its researcher portal.
A Soterix Clinical Trials Direct Current Stimulator will apply 20 minutes of 2.0mA direct current through two biocarbon rubber electrodes encased in saline soaked 5cm x 7cm sponges (8cc of 0.9% saline solution per sponge) placed over the frontal cortices at F3 and F4 (10-20 system).
Experimental: Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation
This arm receives cognitive training combined with sham tDCS.
Cognitive Training employs an eight component, PositScience BrainHQ suite via its researcher portal.
Sham stimulation is performed with the same device and all procedures will be identical except for the duration of stimulation. Participants will receive 30 seconds of 2 mA of direct current stimulation at the beginning of the session. Participants habituate to the sensation of tDCS within 30-60 seconds of stimulation. This procedure provides the same sensation of tDCS without the full duration of stimulation, making it a highly effective sham procedure.
Experimental: Educational Training + Active Stimulation
This arm receives educational training combined with active tDCS.
A Soterix Clinical Trials Direct Current Stimulator will apply 20 minutes of 2.0mA direct current through two biocarbon rubber electrodes encased in saline soaked 5cm x 7cm sponges (8cc of 0.9% saline solution per sponge) placed over the frontal cortices at F3 and F4 (10-20 system).
Educational training involves watching educational videos produced by the National Geographic Channel, which cover a range of topics such as history, nature, and wildlife. Participants will be asked to complete questions on the content of the videos to ensure sustained attention.
Experimental: Educational Training + Sham Stimulation
This arm receives educational training combined with sham tDCS.
Sham stimulation is performed with the same device and all procedures will be identical except for the duration of stimulation. Participants will receive 30 seconds of 2 mA of direct current stimulation at the beginning of the session. Participants habituate to the sensation of tDCS within 30-60 seconds of stimulation. This procedure provides the same sensation of tDCS without the full duration of stimulation, making it a highly effective sham procedure.
Educational training involves watching educational videos produced by the National Geographic Channel, which cover a range of topics such as history, nature, and wildlife. Participants will be asked to complete questions on the content of the videos to ensure sustained attention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Cognitive Ability.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post assessment (3 months).
Composite measure of cognitive ability as defined by NIH toolbox fluid cognition fully corrected T-score. Minimum change = -13, Maximum change = 26. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The minimum and maximum for Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation, Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation, Educational Training + Active Stimulation and Educational Training + Sham Stimulation are (-13, 20) and (-10, 26), respectively. This outcome is measured for the participants who received cognitive training, including both Phase I and Phase II participants, N=334 (Phase I N=42, Phase II N=292).
Change from baseline to post assessment (3 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase I POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance Measure.(Phase I POSIT Z-Score)
Time Frame: Baseline to post assessment (3 months).
POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance measure involves performance on the 8 selected cognitive training tasks set to the medium difficulty level and provides a measure of proximal performance on cognitive training tasks central to the cognitive training condition. The higher score indicates better performance. The range of POSIT Z-Score at 3-month is -1.04 to 1.75. the minimum and maximum for Cognitive training group and Education training group are (-0.24, 1.75) and (-1.04, 1.39), respectively.
Baseline to post assessment (3 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam Woods, Ph.D, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

August 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB201600785-N-R
  • R01AG054077 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • RF1AG071469 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • AWD00532 (Other Identifier: UFIRST)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Training

Subscribe