A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Intravenous Followed by Oral Itraconazole With Intravenous Caspofungin For Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Neutropenic Participants With Hematological Malignancy

May 2, 2019 updated by: Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd.

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing The Efficacy of Intravenous Followed by Oral Itraconazole With Intravenous Caspofungin For Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Neutropenic Subjects With Hematological Malignancy

The purpose of this study is to investigate the hypothesis that the efficacy of intravenous (IV) itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole is non-inferior to that of intravenous caspofungin as empiric therapy for suspected fungal infection participants with fever and neutropenia.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijign, China
      • Beijing, China
      • Changchun, China
      • Changzhou, China
      • Fuzhou, China
      • Guangzhou, China
      • Guiyang, China
      • Hefei, China
      • Shanghai, China
      • Suzhou, China
      • Tianjin, China
      • Zhengzhou, China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must be hospitalized with hematologic malignancy treated by myelosuppressive therapy and/or Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Participant must have a diagnosis of neutropenia with neutrophil count < 500/microliters (mcL) (0.5 × 10^9/ liters [L]) for at least 96 hours at screening
  • Participant must have a diagnosis of fever and meet the following criteria: 1) Oral/rectal temperature greater than or equal to (>=) 38 degree celsius or axillary temperature (>=) 37.5 degree celsius and is not considered related to blood products transfusion or drug fever, 2) Not responding to broad-spectrum gram-positive and gram-negative antibiotics for 4-7 days with or without signs and symptoms that potentially attributable to deep fungal infection and 3) Defervescence within 3 days after the first broad-spectrum antibiotics but recurrence afterwards.
  • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta human chorionic gonadotropin [b hCG]) and pregnancy test at screening
  • A woman must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) for the purposes of assisted reproduction during the study period and until the menstrual period following the end of study treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is concomitantly using other systematic antifungal drugs as empirical treatment
  • Has evidence of inadequately managed bacterial infection
  • Is currently receiving any Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)-metabolized/P-glycoprotein-transported drugs (including but not limited to cisapride, pimozide, quinidine, dofetilide, levacetylmethadol, terfenadine, astemizole, mizolastine, bepridil, sertindole, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) inhibitor [for example, simvastatin, lovastatin], oral midazolam, triazolam, ergot alkaloids [eg, dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine] and nisoldipine) that should be prohibited in this study
  • Has known allergy, intolerance or hypersensitivity to azole and echinocandin antifungals or its excipients
  • Has a contraindication to the use of sodium chloride injection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Itraconazole
Participants will receive 200 milligram (mg) of itraconazole intravenously (IV) twice daily on Day 1 and Day 2, followed by 200 mg once daily through Day 14. From Day 15 to Day 28, participants will receive 200 mg (20 milliliters [mL]) of itraconazole oral solution orally twice daily. Participants, who are not suitable for oral administration of itraconazole based on the investigator's judgment, will receive 200 mg of itaconazole IV once daily from Day 15 to Day 28.
Active Comparator: Caspofungin
Participants will receive 70 mg of caspofungin IV once daily on Day 1 followed by 50 mg IV infusion once daily thereafter through Day 28.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate Measured by the Percentage of Participants That Achieve all of the Following 5 Composite Endpoints
Time Frame: Up to 36 days
Response rate in each of the 2 treatment groups will be measured by the percentage of participants that achieve all of the following 5 composite endpoints: 1) survival for 7 days after completion of treatment, 2) absence of breakthrough invasive fungal infection during the study drug administration and within the first 7 days after completion of treatment, 3) successful treatment of baseline fungal infection, 4) defervescence and 5) no premature withdrawal from the study due to drug-related toxicity or lack of efficacy.
Up to 36 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Survival for 7 Days After Completion of Treatment
Time Frame: Up to 36 days
Up to 36 days
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infection
Time Frame: Day 3 up to Day 28 (End of treatment [EoT]) and within 7 days after EoT (Day 29 up to Day 35)
Absence of breakthrough invasive fungal infection is defined as the clinically or/and microbiologically documented fungal infection with an onset on or after day 3 of the study treatment during the study drug administration and within the first 7 days after completion of treatment.
Day 3 up to Day 28 (End of treatment [EoT]) and within 7 days after EoT (Day 29 up to Day 35)
Percentage of Participants With Successful Treatment of Baseline Fungal Infection
Time Frame: Screening up to Day 3
Successful treatment of baseline fungal infection is defined as the clinically and microbiologically documented fungal infection with an onset within screening to 2 days after the study treatment.
Screening up to Day 3
Percentage of Participants With Defervescence During the Period of Neutropenia
Time Frame: Up to 36 days
Defervescence is defined as oral/rectal temperature less than (<) 38 degree celsius or axillary temperature (<) 37.5 degree celsius for over 48 hours) during the period of neutropenia.
Up to 36 days
Percentage of Participants With No Premature Withdrawal From the Study due to Drug-related Toxicity or Lack of Efficacy
Time Frame: Up to 36 days
Up to 36 days
Response Rate Measured by the Percentage of Participants That Achieve all of the Following 5 Composite Endpoints With Oral Administration of Itraconazole
Time Frame: Up to 36 days
Response rate will be measured by the percentage of participants (who received oral administration of itraconazole) that achieve all of the following 5 composite endpoints: 1) survival for 7 days after completion of treatment, 2) absence of breakthrough invasive fungal infection during the study drug administration and within the first 7 days after completion of treatment, 3) successful treatment of baseline fungal infection, 4) defervescence and 5) no premature withdrawal from the study due to drug-related toxicity or lack of efficacy.
Up to 36 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Itraconazole

Subscribe