Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (FUMAPMS)

December 22, 2020 updated by: Jacob L Talbot, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate treatment in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS).

Half of the patients will receive dimethyl fumarate and the other half will receive placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system and is presumed to be caused by T cell-mediated autoimmune processes. PPMS has no registered treatment options only symptomatic treatment exists. Progressive forms of MS are characterized clinically by gradual symptom development with or without superimposed relapses.

Fumarates have long been known to have disease-attenuating effects in psoriasis. They have been in routine use in dermatology in Germany for several decades. Dimethyl fumarate has the interesting property of combining immunological effects, at least partly mediated by interference with nuclear factor kappa B and other transcription factors, and also anti-oxidative and neuroprotective effects mediated by activation of the transcription factor Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-Related Factor 2 (NRF2). Dimethyl fumarate is currently approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting MS by the European medicines Agency in a dose of 240 mg twice per day.

Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a treatment responsive biomarker of neuronal and axonal death when appearing in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and it has been associated with long-term prognosis in MS. The concentration is often elevated in progressive MS patients. Treatment effect is measured by measuring changes in neurofilament light chain concentration over the course of 48 weeks of treatment with either active drug or placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • PPMS according to the McDonald (2010) and Lublin (2014) criteria
  • Disease duration at least one year
  • EDSS ≤ 6.5
  • Written informed consent to study participation
  • No other signs of significant disease judged by the investigator
  • Eligible for randomization to active treatment or placebo as assessed by CSF NFL levels above 380ng/L
  • Not eligible for randomization as assessed by CSF biomarker studies but accepts follow-up and open-label treatment per protocol
  • Patients not eligible for randomization due to low NFL concentrations in CSF at screening can be followed up after 48 weeks, and are eligible for open-label treatment if they fulfil one of the following clinical criteria of disease progression:
  • 1 point increase in EDSS score from screening to week 48 if screening EDSS <6
  • 0.5 point increase in EDSS score from screening to week 48 if screening EDSS>5.5
  • 2 point increase in a physical functional system
  • Worsening in SDMT, 9HPT or T25FW >20% from screening to week 48

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Lack of effective contraception for women of child-bearing potential
  • Relapse within 6 months of inclusion
  • Methylprednisolone treatment within 3 months of inclusion
  • Treatment with interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulin G or other immunomodulatory treatment within 6 months of inclusion
  • Treatment with mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine or other immunosuppressive treatment within 6 months of inclusion
  • Findings on the screening MRI judged to preclude participation by the treating physician
  • Other diseases associated with immunodeficiency
  • Other diseases judged to be relevant by the treating physician
  • Anticoagulant therapy other than platelet inhibitors
  • Active malignant disease in the previous 5 years
  • Renal insufficiency or blood creatinine > 150 μmol/l
  • Present or chronic infection with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, HIV (tested in the screening blood samples) or other infections found to be relevant by the treating physician.
  • Psychiatric disorders or other disorders impairing the patient's ability to participate in the trial
  • Contraindication to MRI
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to dimethyl fumarate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active drug
Dimethyl fumarate, 240mg twice daily for 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Tecfidera
  • BG-12
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo Oral Capsules, 2 tablets twice daily for 48 weeks
Manufactured to mimic Dimethyl Fumarate capsules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurofilament light chain in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NFL) is measured twice over a course of 48 weeks. Patients will have a spinal tap performed at baseline and again at week 48.
0-48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in EDSS change from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. EDSS is performed by a certified physician, primarily the PI.
0-48 weeks
Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in T25FW change from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. T25FW is evaluated by the principal investigator or a delegated member of the study team.
0-48 weeks
Nine hole peg test (9HPT)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in 9HPT change from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. 9HPT is evaluated by the principal investigator or a delegated member of the study team.
0-48 weeks
Symbol digit modalities test (SDMT)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in the SDMT change from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group using a general linear model with treatment allocation as factor and the screening SDMT value as covariate. SDMT is evaluated by the principal investigator or a delegated member of the study team.
0-48 weeks
CSF/Serum Immunoglobulin type G index
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
Is assessed from a sample of the cerebrospinal fluid at baseline and at week 48 and change is recorded. The analysis will be performed by the routine diagnostics department at the hospital where the spinal tap is performed.
0-48 weeks
Cerebrospinal fluid-serum albumin quotient
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change in CSF-serum albumin quotient from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. The analysis will be performed by the routine diagnostics department at the hospital where the spinal tap is performed.
0-48 weeks
soluble CD14 (sCD14)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change in sCD14 concentration from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. The analysis is performed by a multiplex luminex assay (R&D systems).
0-48 weeks
soluble CD27 (sCD27)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change in sCD27 concentration from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. The analysis is performed by a multiplex luminex assay (R&D systems).
0-48 weeks
BCMA
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change in BCMA concentration from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. The analysis is performed by a multiplex luminex assay (R&D systems).
0-48 weeks
Chitinase 3-like-1
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change in CHI3L1 concentration from screening visit to week 48 visit between the treatment and placebo group. The analysis is performed by a multiplex luminex assay (R&D systems).
0-48 weeks
Myelin Basic protein (MBP)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change in MBP concentration from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. The analysis is performed by a enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (R&D DuoSet).
0-48 weeks
Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions from screening visit to W48 between the treatment and placebo group. This analysis will be performed by our collaborator at Hvidovre Hospital (Danish Research Center for Magentic Resonance)
0-48 weeks
Fractional anisotropy (FA) in Normal Appearing White Matter (NAWM)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change from screening to W48 of FA in NAWM between the treatment and placebo group. This analysis will be performed by our collaborator at Hvidovre Hospital (Danish Research Center for Magentic Resonance)
0-48 weeks
Change in lesion volume
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the change from screening to W48 in lesion volume. This analysis will be performed by our collaborator at Hvidovre Hospital (Danish Research Center for Magentic Resonance)
0-48 weeks
Change from screening in in magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) of T2 lesions
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change from screening to W48 in MTR of T2 lesions between the treatment and placebo group. This analysis will be performed by our collaborator at Hvidovre Hospital (Danish Research Center for Magentic Resonance).
0-48 weeks
Thalamic volume
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in change from screening to W48 of thalamic volume between the treatment and placebo group. This analysis will be performed by our collaborator at Hvidovre Hospital (Danish Research Center for Magentic Resonance).
0-48 weeks
Percent brain volume change (PBVC)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks
We will analyze the difference in percentage change in brain volume from screening visit to week 48 between the treatment and placebo group. This analysis will be performed by our collaborator at Hvidovre Hospital (Danish Research Center for Magentic Resonance).
0-48 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BVMTR
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening for Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised (BVMTR) The test is performed by the principal investigator or a delegated member of the study team.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
California Verbal Learning Test 2 (CVLT-II)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening for California Verbal Learning Test 2 (CVLT-II). The test is performed by the principal investigator or a delegated member of the study team.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
UDI
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
The questionnaire is handed out at screening visit, week 48 and week 96.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
FSMC
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
The questionnaire is handed out at screening visit, week 48 and week 96.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
MSIS-29
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
The questionnaire is handed out at screening visit, week 48 and week 96.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Number of Gadolinium (Gd) enhancing lesions on MRI
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening/W48 in number of Gd-enhancing lesions.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Number of new T2 lesions
Time Frame: 48-96 weeks
Change from screening in number of new T2 lesions
48-96 weeks
Number of enlarged T2 lesions
Time Frame: 48-96 weeks
Change from screening in number of enlarged T2 lesions
48-96 weeks
Brain volume change
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening/W48 in volume of cortical grey matter (CGM), normal appearing white matter (NAWM), thalamus, putamen and lesion volume.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change in Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR).
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening/W48 in Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR) of CGM, NAWM, the putamen and thalamic nuclei
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures (FA and mean diffusivity).
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening/W48 in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures (FA and mean diffusivity) of CGM, NAWM (except FA in NAWM from screening to week 48), lesions, the putamen and thalamic nuclei.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Cross sectional area at C2 level of the cervical spinal cord on MRI
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change from screening/W48 in the cross sectional area at the C2 level of the cervical spinal cord on MRI.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Circle drawing test at the time of the MRI
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
At the time of MRI (screening, week 48 and week 96) a circle drawing test will be performed.
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Change in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (serum NFL)
Time Frame: 0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks
Is assessed from a blood sample at screening visit, W48 visit, and W96 visit. The analysis is performed by the neuroimmunology laboratory with a commercially available SIMOA-assay (Quanterix).
0-48 weeks & 48-96 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacob Lando Talbot, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Dimethyl fumarate

3
Subscribe