MRI as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery (MRI-MVS)

January 9, 2018 updated by: Atlantic Health System

Prospective Evaluation of MRI as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: MRI-MVS Study

Based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of mitral valve disease, quantifying the severity of mitral regurgitation is central to determining which patients are appropriate for correction of their mitral valve by surgery. Specifically, once the diagnosis of severe MR is made, patients are considered appropriate for mitral valve surgery in almost all clinical circumstances. However, there is a significant mortality and morbidity associated with mitral valve surgery The most common diagnostic tool to assess the severity of MR is echocardiography. Several studies have shown that echocardiography parameters used to quantify and qualify MR have high inter-observer and intra-observer variability, calling the accuracy of these parameters into question. Furthermore, studies have shown that there is a significant degree of discordance between echocardiography and MRI when assessing MR, particularly among patients referred for mitral valve surgery. In a recent study, quantification of mitral regurgitant volume MRI was found to be more accurate than echocardiography in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery. All 38 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in this study were deemed appropriate according the ACC/AHA guidelines based on echocardiographic findings. However, more than 2/3rds of patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in this study did not have severe MR by MRI. Thus, we propose this prospective multicenter trial to assess: 1) the severity of MR by MRI in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. 2) the impact of mitral valve surgery on quality of life and healthcare costs in the context of MR severity by MRI, 3) assess patient outcomes post surgery in the context of MR severity by MRI and 4) the likelihood of valve replacement vs. repair according to MR severity by MRI.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Mitral regurgitation is a common disease which can lead to heart failure and death if left untreated. The only known therapy for mitral regurgitation is correction of the mitral valve, most commonly performed by surgical repair or replacement. According the STS database, there were 15,748 lone mitral valve surgeries in 2014. The number of mitral valve surgeries has been increasing with a 23% increase between the years 2010 and 2014. Based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of mitral valve disease, quantifying the severity of mitral regurgitation is central to determining which patients are appropriate for correction of their mitral valve by surgery. Specifically, once the diagnosis of severe MR is made, patients are considered appropriate for mitral valve surgery in almost all clinical circumstances. However, there is a significant mortality and morbidity associated with mitral valve surgery. In the STS database, 30 day mortality was ~2% for repair and ~5% for replacement. This data does not take into account long-term mortality and morbidity from re-operation and life-long anti-coagulation as well as changes in quality of life.

The most common diagnostic tool to assess the severity of MR is echocardiography. Several studies have shown that echocardiography parameters used to quantify and qualify MR have high inter-observer and intra-observer variability, calling the accuracy of these parameters into question. Furthermore, studies have shown that there is a significant degree of discordance between echocardiography and MRI when assessing MR, particularly among patients referred for mitral valve surgery. In a recent study, quantification of mitral regurgitant volume MRI was found to be more accurate than echocardiography in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery. All 38 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in this study were deemed appropriate according the ACC/AHA guidelines based on echocardiographic findings. However, more than 2/3rds of patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in this study did not have severe MR by MRI. Thus, we propose this prospective multicenter trial to assess: 1) the severity of MR by MRI in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. 2) the impact of mitral valve surgery on quality of life and healthcare costs in the context of MR severity by MRI, 3) assess patient outcomes post surgery in the context of MR severity by MRI and 4) the likelihood of valve replacement vs. repair according to MR severity by MRI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects who are scheduled to undergo ACC/AHA guideline directed mitral valve surgery for mitral regurgitation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years and older.
  • Able to give informed consent.
  • Undergoing lone mitral valve surgery for chronic primary mitral regurgitation within 30 days.
  • Indication for mitral valve surgery is a class I or IIa according to the 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary mitral regurgitation.
  • Have a device which is not compatible with MRI
  • Claustrophobia preventing MRI.
  • Concomitant CABG, other valve surgery, or other cardiac surgery.
  • Atrial fibrillation or other substantial arrhythmia that would substantially degrade MRI image acquisition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Mitral Valve Surgery
Patients undergoing ACC/AHA guideline directed mitral valve surgery for mitral insufficiency.
ACC/AHA guideline directed mitral valve repair or replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative and peri-operative outcomes according to the mitral regurgitation severity quantified by MRI.
Time Frame: 2 years
Operative and peri-operative outcomes (mortality, morbidity, hospitalizations, reoperation, bleeding, and CVA) in the context of mitral regurgitation severity quantified by MRI.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years
Operative and peri-operative outcomes (mortality, morbidity, hospitalizations, reoperation, bleeding, and CVA) in the context of mitral regurgitation severity quantified by MRI.
2 years
Repair vs Replacement
Time Frame: 4 months
Assess if the likelihood of mitral valve repair vs. replacement is associated with mitral regurgitant severity as quantified by MRI.
4 months
Severity of mitral regurgitation as quantified MRI in subjects who are undergoing guideline directed mitral valve surgery.
Time Frame: 0 days
Cross sectional data regarding severity of mitral regurgitation as quantified MRI in subjects who are undergoing guideline directed mitral valve surgery
0 days
Correlation of pre-surgical regurgitant volume as quantified by MRI with post-surgical change in LV EDV.
Time Frame: 4 months
Correlation of pre-surgical regurgitant volume as quantified by MRI with post-surgical change in LV EDV.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Mitral valve surgery

3
Subscribe