Randomized Trial of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve vs Redo Surgery for Bioprosthetic Mitral Dysfunction

May 21, 2020 updated by: DIMYTRI ALEXANDRE DE ALVIM SIQUEIRA, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

Randomized Trial of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Intervention vs Redo Surgery for the Treatment of Structural Mitral Bioprosthetic Dysfunction

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation has emerged as a valid alternative to redo surgery for patients with surgical bioprosthetic dysfunction. Nowadays, transcatheter, transeptal mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TsMViV) has been adopted in many centers worldwide. Some studies report low rates of periprocedural morbidity and mortality and favorable hemodynamic parameters of valve performance. However, medium and long-term data on TsMViV as compared to redo surgical mitral valve replacement (rSMVR) is not yet established. Studies of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility comparing both strategies were also not reported. In particular, late prosthesis durability and hemodynamic performance after TsMViV are largely unknown and need to be elucidated before widely indicated, especially among younger and low-risk surgical candidates with failed mitral bioprostheses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of transeptal, transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve versus redo surgical mitral valve replacement.

After multidisciplinary, heart team discussion, patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to receive either transcatheter, transeptal mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TsMViV) with the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (THV) or redo, mitral valve replacement with 3 commercially available surgical bioprosthetic valves. A sub-randomization in the surgical group will define which bioprosthetic valve will be used. Patients will be seen for follow-up visits at discharge, 30 days, 6 months and annually through 10 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 04012909
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
        • Contact:
          • Dimytri A Siqueira, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • DImytri A Siqueira, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandre A Abizaid, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Auristela A Ramos, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fausto Feres, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age<70 years;
  • Symptoms of heart failure NYHA class>ll;
  • Severe mitral bioprosthetic dysfunction (stenosis, regurgitation, mixed) defined by echocardiography;
  • Heart team (including cardiac surgeon) agree on eligibility including assessment that transeptal, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TsMVR) and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (rSMVR) are appropriate;
  • The study patient or the study patient's legal representative informed of the nature of the study, agreed to its provisions and provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) center;
  • The study patient agreed to comply with all required post- procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 10 years and analysis close date visits, which was conducted as a phone follow-up;
  • Heart team agreed (a priori) on treatment strategy for concomitant coronary disease (if present);
  • Patient agreed to undergo redo surgical mitral valve replacement (rSMVR) if randomized to control treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart Team assessment of inoperability (including examining cardiac surgeon);
  • Hostile chest;
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction < 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave Ml, or non-Q wave Ml with total creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase MB isoform (CK-MB) and/or cardiac troponin elevations (WHO definition)];
  • Concomitant severe valvular disease (aortic, tricuspid or pulmonic) requiring surgical intervention;
  • Mitral mechanical prosthesis or mitral valve rings;
  • Preexisting mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in other position with dysfunction;
  • Complex coronary artery disease: unprotected left main coronary artery, Syntax score > 32 (in the absence of prior revascularization);
  • Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is not an exclusion criteria;
  • Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation;
  • Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb< 9 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (Pht< 50,000 cell/mL);
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction (HOCM);
  • Severe ventricular dysfunction with left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20%;
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation;
  • Active upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure;
  • A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure;
  • Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months (90 days) of the procedure;
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) and/or renal replacement therapy at the time of screening;
  • Estimated life expectancy < 24 months (730 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease;
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study;
  • Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure;
  • Patient refuses redo mitral valve replacement surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Intervention
Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation with SAPIEN 3
OTHER: Redo Surgery
Surgical Mitral valve replacement
Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Major cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular events
Time Frame: 12 months
All-cause death; Cardiovascular death; Disabling stroke (neurologist assessment)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Procedure-related complications
Time Frame: 30 days

Major vascular complications;

  • Bleeding and transfusions;
  • Atrial fibrillation;
  • Acute renal failure;
  • Left-ventricular outflow obstruction;
  • Reoperation
30 days
Rate of Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 12 months
Rehospitalization at 12 months
12 months
Rate of Prosthetic Thrombosis
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Prosthetic thrombosis at 3- and 12 months (as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and multi-slice tomography).
3 and 12 months
Rate of Structural Valve dysfunction (as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography)
Time Frame: 10 years
Structural valve dysfunction assessed annually, up to 10-year follow-up.
10 years
Rate of Bioprosthetic Valve Failure (as assessed by clinical outcomes and echocardiographic evaluations)
Time Frame: 10 years
Bioprosthetic valve failure assessed annually, up to 10-year follow-up.
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dimytri Siqueira, MD, PhD, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4993/2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Prosthetic Valve Stenosis and Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Intervention

3
Subscribe